FNM's Clifton MP 'may not retain party's nomination'
tribune242:
TROUBLE may be brewing in the FNM's Clifton constituency as reports suggest that the incumbent Member of Parliament Kendal Wright may not be retaining the party's nomination to run for the area in the next general election.
According to reports reaching The Tribune, a young woman attorney from a prominent law firm was being put forward as the party's new "top pick" for the incumbent's seat.
As it is a well known secret that there is little love lost between Mr Wright and the party's leader Hubert Ingraham, some sources have suggested that this move could be designed to finally remove the MP from the party's backbench.
However, with the next general election less than 23 months away, other sources within the FNM have shot down such reports as mere PLP propaganda designed at "distracting" the party from its current work.
"The Prime Minister is busy at this time conducting the business of running the country. He is not even thinking about candidates at this point so such suggestions would be ludicrous at best. And one must remember, whatever the perception may be with regards to Mr Wright and the Prime Minister's relationship, a seat is a seat. Why would you run anyone in a constituency where you have an incumbent member?
"There are many other seats where young energetic candidates can be placed. Farm Road for instance is one that we would like to win. So that is where I believe you would see interest being placed," the source said.
Additionally, there have been reports from some political quarters that the government might replace the Clifton constituency totally by moving the boundary lines and recreating the former Adelaide constituency.
These new boundary lines, it was said, would consume the western part of New Providence in the constituencies of Adelaide in the south-west and Killarney to the west-north.
June 24, 2010
tribune242
A political blog about Bahamian politics in The Bahamas, Bahamian Politicans - and the entire Bahamas political lot. Bahamian Blogger Dennis Dames keeps you updated on the political news and views throughout the islands of The Bahamas without fear or favor. Bahamian Politicians and the Bahamian Political Arena: Updates one Post at a time on Bahamas Politics and Bahamas Politicans; and their local, regional and international policies and perspectives.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Election court lawyers want $400,000 from Parliamentary Commissioner Errol Bethel and defeated Free National Movement candidate Dr. Duane Sands
Election court lawyers want $400,000
By JUAN MCCARTNEY ~ Guardian Senior Reporter ~ juan@nasguard.com:
An already cash-strapped Public Treasury will be asked to cough up hundreds of thousands of dollars, as the attorneys who represented Progressive Liberal Party Member of Parliament Ryan Pinder in the Elizabeth Election Court challenge earlier this year will ask for more than $400,000 from Parliamentary Commissioner Errol Bethel and defeated Free National Movement candidate Dr. Duane Sands.
The court costs will be comprised of a $357,000 bill for the actual court proceedings, and a $28,700 bill for services rendered involving Sands' unsuccessful bid to have Pinder's Election Court petition thrown out before the actual proceedings began, according to Wayne Munroe, one of the attorneys who represented Pinder.
On March 23 Election Court Senior Justices Anita Allen and John Isaacs ruled Pinder the winner of the challenge and ordered Bethel to pay 75 percent of Pinder's costs, with Sands responsible for the remaining 25 percent.
Pinder's lead counsel was Philip Brave Davis. He was assisted by Munroe, Valentine Grimes and Keod Smith.
Munroe said the bill for the strike out petition has been filed for some time, but the bill for the court proceedings will be filed today - the last day Munroe has to do so without asking for an extension.
The Supreme Court Registrar will then go over the bills item by item and decide if any alterations should be made.
Sands and Bethel are now faced with a bill $100,000 higher than they could have settled for.
Munroe said that Pinder's legal team offered Bethel and Sands' respective counsels an offer to settle the strike out bill at $20,000.
He added that Bethel and Sands' were also offered to settle the court proceedings at $275,000 but refused both offers.
Elizabeth Returning Officer (and Director of Immigration) Jack Thompson was also named as a respondent in the by-election court challenge, but was not ordered to pay costs.
The February 16 by-election ended with Sands receiving 1,501 votes to Pinder's 1,499 votes. However on March 23 the Election Court ruled that 5 protest votes cast in favor of Pinder should be counted, pushing Pinder's total to 1,504 votes, making him the winner of the seat.
Bethel was blasted in the justices' ruling, where it was said that he failed to protect the integrity of the Elizabeth register.
And as the PLP MP's legal team prepares to collect on Election Court costs, an FNM MP's legal counsel was still awaiting payment of his hefty bill up to a few weeks ago.
The Guardian understands that Fred Smith, who represented Marco City MP Zhivargo Laing in his successful challenge against former MP Pleasant Bridgewater, had still not received payment on his $1 million bill.
June 23, 2010
thenassauguardian
By JUAN MCCARTNEY ~ Guardian Senior Reporter ~ juan@nasguard.com:
An already cash-strapped Public Treasury will be asked to cough up hundreds of thousands of dollars, as the attorneys who represented Progressive Liberal Party Member of Parliament Ryan Pinder in the Elizabeth Election Court challenge earlier this year will ask for more than $400,000 from Parliamentary Commissioner Errol Bethel and defeated Free National Movement candidate Dr. Duane Sands.
The court costs will be comprised of a $357,000 bill for the actual court proceedings, and a $28,700 bill for services rendered involving Sands' unsuccessful bid to have Pinder's Election Court petition thrown out before the actual proceedings began, according to Wayne Munroe, one of the attorneys who represented Pinder.
On March 23 Election Court Senior Justices Anita Allen and John Isaacs ruled Pinder the winner of the challenge and ordered Bethel to pay 75 percent of Pinder's costs, with Sands responsible for the remaining 25 percent.
Pinder's lead counsel was Philip Brave Davis. He was assisted by Munroe, Valentine Grimes and Keod Smith.
Munroe said the bill for the strike out petition has been filed for some time, but the bill for the court proceedings will be filed today - the last day Munroe has to do so without asking for an extension.
The Supreme Court Registrar will then go over the bills item by item and decide if any alterations should be made.
Sands and Bethel are now faced with a bill $100,000 higher than they could have settled for.
Munroe said that Pinder's legal team offered Bethel and Sands' respective counsels an offer to settle the strike out bill at $20,000.
He added that Bethel and Sands' were also offered to settle the court proceedings at $275,000 but refused both offers.
Elizabeth Returning Officer (and Director of Immigration) Jack Thompson was also named as a respondent in the by-election court challenge, but was not ordered to pay costs.
The February 16 by-election ended with Sands receiving 1,501 votes to Pinder's 1,499 votes. However on March 23 the Election Court ruled that 5 protest votes cast in favor of Pinder should be counted, pushing Pinder's total to 1,504 votes, making him the winner of the seat.
Bethel was blasted in the justices' ruling, where it was said that he failed to protect the integrity of the Elizabeth register.
And as the PLP MP's legal team prepares to collect on Election Court costs, an FNM MP's legal counsel was still awaiting payment of his hefty bill up to a few weeks ago.
The Guardian understands that Fred Smith, who represented Marco City MP Zhivargo Laing in his successful challenge against former MP Pleasant Bridgewater, had still not received payment on his $1 million bill.
June 23, 2010
thenassauguardian
Tuesday, June 22, 2010
Holding people charged with murder for up to three years in Her Majesty's Prison without trial 'may be unconstitutional
Holding murder charged for up to three years 'may be unconstitutional'
By TANEKA THOMPSON
Tribune Staff Reporter
tthompson@tribunemedia.net:
THE Government's intent to amend the law to hold people charged with murder in Her Majesty's Prison for up to three years without trial may be "unconstitutional", with some in the legal community arguing it will violate human rights.
Currently, a person charged with murder or another serious offence can be granted bail if they have not been brought to trial in a reasonable amount of time. Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham has indicated that his administration plans to specify in law that a reasonable amount of time would be three years.
It's a move by the Government to cut down on the number of offenders committing crimes while on bail, and assuage public outcry over those accused of murder being granted bail.
However, the decision has garnered criticism in the legal community.
Damian Gomez, partner in the law firm Chilcott Chambers, told The Tribune: "It's a violation of Article 20, it's a violation of Article 19 (of the constitution) and it's a violation of the common law which says that all citizens have the right not to be deprived of their liberty without some cause."
Mr Gomez, a former senator who has been practising law for more than 20 years, added that it is the fault of the police and prosecution for charging persons with serious offences without sufficient evidence in hand to try them quickly.
"If you charge someone with murder you ought to have enough evidence to proceed immediately. If you know the evidence that you have is insufficient to obtain a conviction, you have no basis then for charging them.
"The real issue is why haven't these people been tried within a reasonable amount of time?"
Attorney Paul Moss believes such a practice violates the human rights of innocent people who may be brought up on murder charges and are forced to languish behind bars for years while police and prosecution search for further evidence.
"Everyone wants a criminal to be locked up, but certainly people don't want the innocent to be locked up. Extending (holding) time to three years is not reasonable. I'm not sure that it's constitutional but certainly it is not the answer because all it means is that they are not on bail but after three years they will get bail and what do you do then, extend it to five years?
"If the government, because of its own failure, is unable to get people to court in a timely fashion, the constitution will not bend to them."
Last month, when speaking to Parliament about proposed amendments to the Bail Act and the issue of crime, Mr Ingraham said he is confident the changes will be lawful and stand up in court.
"The only time you cannot deny bail is when the person has not been tried within a reasonable period of time, but there is no such thing as an absolute right to bail, notwithstanding what anybody else says.
"And it is our intention in the Bahamas to propose that in the context of the Bahamas, a reasonable period of time is three years. We are satisfied that such a provision will withstand any challenge before all competent courts of jurisdiction for the Bahamas."
June 22, 2010
tribune242
By TANEKA THOMPSON
Tribune Staff Reporter
tthompson@tribunemedia.net:
THE Government's intent to amend the law to hold people charged with murder in Her Majesty's Prison for up to three years without trial may be "unconstitutional", with some in the legal community arguing it will violate human rights.
Currently, a person charged with murder or another serious offence can be granted bail if they have not been brought to trial in a reasonable amount of time. Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham has indicated that his administration plans to specify in law that a reasonable amount of time would be three years.
It's a move by the Government to cut down on the number of offenders committing crimes while on bail, and assuage public outcry over those accused of murder being granted bail.
However, the decision has garnered criticism in the legal community.
Damian Gomez, partner in the law firm Chilcott Chambers, told The Tribune: "It's a violation of Article 20, it's a violation of Article 19 (of the constitution) and it's a violation of the common law which says that all citizens have the right not to be deprived of their liberty without some cause."
Mr Gomez, a former senator who has been practising law for more than 20 years, added that it is the fault of the police and prosecution for charging persons with serious offences without sufficient evidence in hand to try them quickly.
"If you charge someone with murder you ought to have enough evidence to proceed immediately. If you know the evidence that you have is insufficient to obtain a conviction, you have no basis then for charging them.
"The real issue is why haven't these people been tried within a reasonable amount of time?"
Attorney Paul Moss believes such a practice violates the human rights of innocent people who may be brought up on murder charges and are forced to languish behind bars for years while police and prosecution search for further evidence.
"Everyone wants a criminal to be locked up, but certainly people don't want the innocent to be locked up. Extending (holding) time to three years is not reasonable. I'm not sure that it's constitutional but certainly it is not the answer because all it means is that they are not on bail but after three years they will get bail and what do you do then, extend it to five years?
"If the government, because of its own failure, is unable to get people to court in a timely fashion, the constitution will not bend to them."
Last month, when speaking to Parliament about proposed amendments to the Bail Act and the issue of crime, Mr Ingraham said he is confident the changes will be lawful and stand up in court.
"The only time you cannot deny bail is when the person has not been tried within a reasonable period of time, but there is no such thing as an absolute right to bail, notwithstanding what anybody else says.
"And it is our intention in the Bahamas to propose that in the context of the Bahamas, a reasonable period of time is three years. We are satisfied that such a provision will withstand any challenge before all competent courts of jurisdiction for the Bahamas."
June 22, 2010
tribune242
Monday, June 21, 2010
Sightings of suspected oil in the seas around the Bahamas from the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico to be investigated
Scientists to investigate suspected oil sightings in Bahamian waters
By NATARIO McKENZIE
Tribune Staff Reporter
nmckenzie@tribunemedia.net:
SCIENTISTS and volunteers are expected to set out today on a five-day expedition to Cay Sal and Bimini to investigate sightings of suspected oil in the seas around the Bahamas from the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) scientists and volunteers will take sediment samples and test them on the Defence Force vessel HMS Bahamas to confirm or deny the presence of oil in Bahamian waters.
The scientists include leading marine ecologist Dr Ethan Freid and marine biologist Kathleen Sealy from the IMO.
Environment Minister Earl Deveaux said: "The group going to Cay Sal will continue any pre-impact assessment. This group will do a more detailed assessment than the first group.
"We are doing it to ensure that we have documented proof of the conditions that existed prior to the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
"The likelihood of fresh oil coming to the Bahamas is indeed remote. The oil is approaching 60 days old from the first spill. We are, according to all the best scientific information, likely to get oil that is weathered in the form of tar balls. What we do not know about is the expanse of the dispersense and what impact they would have and that's why we want to document the conditions in advance of any impact from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill so we can measure it going forward."
According to Mr Deveaux, all the initial expenses for the pre-impact assessment is being handled through NEMA.
"The companies in Grand Bahama have in stock more than 30 per cent of any necessary equipment that we would use if we were required to respond to say, Cay Sal, Bimini, Freeport Harbor or West End. These are the proximate areas where the likelihood of land fall would first occur," Mr Deveaux said.
More than 1,000 people have volunteered to assist in the oil spill clean-up effort, said Mr Deveaux.
"I think the issue we would have would not be the number of persons willing to assist but how we would coordinate the level of preparedness to assist to make it most effective," Mr Deveaux said.
The Attorney General's office is exploring all legal options in the event the government has to seek recompense from any impact the BP oil disaster has on the Bahamas.
"We have taken the information we have to date, and the Attorney General's office is exploring all of legal options with respects to British Petroleum and the United Kingdom in the event we seek recompose from any disaster that hits the Bahamas. We hope that none does," the Minister added.
June 21, 2010
tribune242
By NATARIO McKENZIE
Tribune Staff Reporter
nmckenzie@tribunemedia.net:
SCIENTISTS and volunteers are expected to set out today on a five-day expedition to Cay Sal and Bimini to investigate sightings of suspected oil in the seas around the Bahamas from the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) scientists and volunteers will take sediment samples and test them on the Defence Force vessel HMS Bahamas to confirm or deny the presence of oil in Bahamian waters.
The scientists include leading marine ecologist Dr Ethan Freid and marine biologist Kathleen Sealy from the IMO.
Environment Minister Earl Deveaux said: "The group going to Cay Sal will continue any pre-impact assessment. This group will do a more detailed assessment than the first group.
"We are doing it to ensure that we have documented proof of the conditions that existed prior to the impact of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
"The likelihood of fresh oil coming to the Bahamas is indeed remote. The oil is approaching 60 days old from the first spill. We are, according to all the best scientific information, likely to get oil that is weathered in the form of tar balls. What we do not know about is the expanse of the dispersense and what impact they would have and that's why we want to document the conditions in advance of any impact from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill so we can measure it going forward."
According to Mr Deveaux, all the initial expenses for the pre-impact assessment is being handled through NEMA.
"The companies in Grand Bahama have in stock more than 30 per cent of any necessary equipment that we would use if we were required to respond to say, Cay Sal, Bimini, Freeport Harbor or West End. These are the proximate areas where the likelihood of land fall would first occur," Mr Deveaux said.
More than 1,000 people have volunteered to assist in the oil spill clean-up effort, said Mr Deveaux.
"I think the issue we would have would not be the number of persons willing to assist but how we would coordinate the level of preparedness to assist to make it most effective," Mr Deveaux said.
The Attorney General's office is exploring all legal options in the event the government has to seek recompense from any impact the BP oil disaster has on the Bahamas.
"We have taken the information we have to date, and the Attorney General's office is exploring all of legal options with respects to British Petroleum and the United Kingdom in the event we seek recompose from any disaster that hits the Bahamas. We hope that none does," the Minister added.
June 21, 2010
tribune242
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Pray That The Baha Mar Deal Is Sealed
“We Better Pray Baha Mar Deal Is Sealed”
By ROGAN SMITH:
As the verbal tug of war rages over the multi-billion dollar Baha Mar project and whether to allow 5,000 Chinese workers to enter the country - one leading contractor says Bahamians better pray that The Bahamas gets the deal, if not the entire island’s tourism product will be resting "solely on the shoulders of Sol Kerzner and Atlantis."
Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham sent tongues wagging when he announced earlier this week that he would not have approved the Baha Mar deal if his administration were in office in 2005.
Former Prime Minister and Opposition Leader Perry Christie approved the Cable Beach project.
Since Mr. Ingraham’s announcement, Mr. Christie has expressed serious concerns about the way Mr. Ingraham "politicises" the investment sector in the country and he warned him to desist his "irresponsible" approach to potential investors.
Two years ago gaming giant, Harrah’s Entertainment – Baha Mar’s former strategic partner – pulled out of the deal reportedly in response to comments Mr. Ingraham made in the House of Assembly.
At the time Mr. Ingraham expressed reservations about the financial viability of the Baha Mar developers, indicating that he had more confidence in Harrah’s ability to finance the project.
But, Bahamian Contractors Association (BCA) President Stephen Wrinkle said it is crucial that the Baha Mar project comes on stream as it would help to significantly grow the economy.
The $2.6 billion project promises to create thousands of temporary and full-time jobs and transform the drab Cable Beach area into a glitzy tourist mecca.
"I think he has [Mr. Kerzner] carried the load magnificently for several years, but can you imagine 8,000 new jobs and 5,000 new rooms? The room tax alone from that is [huge]. Phenomenal income streams are going to be available for that mega project," Mr. Wrinkle said during a recent Bahama Journal interview.
"I would like to see as much support given by to the government to Mr. (Sarkis) Izmirlian [Baha Mar Chairman and CEO] and his team. I think they’ve done a fantastic job of holding on. They went through a terrible experience with their Nevada group and a huge failure. They’ve incurred serious carrying costs. I think at the end of the day it’s going to be a better project than it would’ve been because you always learn more from your losses than you do your gains. But, they’ve stood the test of time and quite frankly I think we can see a renewed Cable Beach."
Mr. Wrinkle said the project would also provide huge benefits for The Bahamas.
"We’re going to have double the marketing that we have now; double the amount of people arriving at the airport now and double all the numbers that Kerzner has," he said.
"Remember what an impact we had when they built phase three of Atlantis. What they’re doing with Baha Mar is equal to all of the phases they did at Atlantis and they’re doing it one phase. This is a big deal," he said.
Regarding the Chinese workers that the government plans to bring in, Mr. Wrinkle said they are needed.
"They are calling for 8,000 workers out there; 4,000 workers have got to be found; we can’t provide 4,000 workers. We’d be hard pressed to provide half of that. On these big international projects it’s just a fact of life. We’ve sat at the table; the BCA has tried to represent the interests of Bahamian contractors and workers and we’ve had some success with Baha Mar; they’ve been receptive," he said.
"They have a commitment with the government to hire Bahamians. It’s in their Head of Agreement. It is in the contract with China State Construction and China Finance Bank. There is language in there that mandates that they make the effort and employ Bahamians where possible."
He continued: "The problem in the past is it’s never been fully implemented. So, we’ve been very active in trying to make sure that we have a seat at the table and that wherever and whenever we can gain access to work that it’s offered. These projects are so enormous that when you think in terms of $2 billion in a build-up that they say is going to take five years, every day, whether they hit a lick or not, is going to cost them several million dollars. So, the productivity has to be there. Imagine trying to run 8,000 people on a construction site. This is a huge endeavour and after that we’re going to have 8,000 permanent jobs."
June 17th, 2010
jonesbahamas
By ROGAN SMITH:
As the verbal tug of war rages over the multi-billion dollar Baha Mar project and whether to allow 5,000 Chinese workers to enter the country - one leading contractor says Bahamians better pray that The Bahamas gets the deal, if not the entire island’s tourism product will be resting "solely on the shoulders of Sol Kerzner and Atlantis."
Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham sent tongues wagging when he announced earlier this week that he would not have approved the Baha Mar deal if his administration were in office in 2005.
Former Prime Minister and Opposition Leader Perry Christie approved the Cable Beach project.
Since Mr. Ingraham’s announcement, Mr. Christie has expressed serious concerns about the way Mr. Ingraham "politicises" the investment sector in the country and he warned him to desist his "irresponsible" approach to potential investors.
Two years ago gaming giant, Harrah’s Entertainment – Baha Mar’s former strategic partner – pulled out of the deal reportedly in response to comments Mr. Ingraham made in the House of Assembly.
At the time Mr. Ingraham expressed reservations about the financial viability of the Baha Mar developers, indicating that he had more confidence in Harrah’s ability to finance the project.
But, Bahamian Contractors Association (BCA) President Stephen Wrinkle said it is crucial that the Baha Mar project comes on stream as it would help to significantly grow the economy.
The $2.6 billion project promises to create thousands of temporary and full-time jobs and transform the drab Cable Beach area into a glitzy tourist mecca.
"I think he has [Mr. Kerzner] carried the load magnificently for several years, but can you imagine 8,000 new jobs and 5,000 new rooms? The room tax alone from that is [huge]. Phenomenal income streams are going to be available for that mega project," Mr. Wrinkle said during a recent Bahama Journal interview.
"I would like to see as much support given by to the government to Mr. (Sarkis) Izmirlian [Baha Mar Chairman and CEO] and his team. I think they’ve done a fantastic job of holding on. They went through a terrible experience with their Nevada group and a huge failure. They’ve incurred serious carrying costs. I think at the end of the day it’s going to be a better project than it would’ve been because you always learn more from your losses than you do your gains. But, they’ve stood the test of time and quite frankly I think we can see a renewed Cable Beach."
Mr. Wrinkle said the project would also provide huge benefits for The Bahamas.
"We’re going to have double the marketing that we have now; double the amount of people arriving at the airport now and double all the numbers that Kerzner has," he said.
"Remember what an impact we had when they built phase three of Atlantis. What they’re doing with Baha Mar is equal to all of the phases they did at Atlantis and they’re doing it one phase. This is a big deal," he said.
Regarding the Chinese workers that the government plans to bring in, Mr. Wrinkle said they are needed.
"They are calling for 8,000 workers out there; 4,000 workers have got to be found; we can’t provide 4,000 workers. We’d be hard pressed to provide half of that. On these big international projects it’s just a fact of life. We’ve sat at the table; the BCA has tried to represent the interests of Bahamian contractors and workers and we’ve had some success with Baha Mar; they’ve been receptive," he said.
"They have a commitment with the government to hire Bahamians. It’s in their Head of Agreement. It is in the contract with China State Construction and China Finance Bank. There is language in there that mandates that they make the effort and employ Bahamians where possible."
He continued: "The problem in the past is it’s never been fully implemented. So, we’ve been very active in trying to make sure that we have a seat at the table and that wherever and whenever we can gain access to work that it’s offered. These projects are so enormous that when you think in terms of $2 billion in a build-up that they say is going to take five years, every day, whether they hit a lick or not, is going to cost them several million dollars. So, the productivity has to be there. Imagine trying to run 8,000 people on a construction site. This is a huge endeavour and after that we’re going to have 8,000 permanent jobs."
June 17th, 2010
jonesbahamas
Saturday, June 19, 2010
The National Oil Spill Committee is on alert as concerned citizens have reported sightings of what they believe to be oil sheens in Bahamian waters
Experts to probe oil spill reports
By MEGAN REYNOLDS
Tribune Staff Reporter
mreynolds@tribunemedia.net:
SIGHTINGS of suspected oil in the seas around The Bahamas from the spill in the Gulf of Mexico will be investigated by scientists setting out on a five-day expedition to Cay Sal and Bimini on Monday.
The team of IMO scientists and volunteers will take sediment samples and test them on the Defence Force vessel HMS Bahamas to confirm or deny the presence of oil in Bahamian waters.
The National Oil Spill Committee is on alert as concerned citizens have reported sightings of what they believe to be oil sheens in Bahamian waters.
Director of the Bahamas Environment, Science and Technology Commission (BEST) Philip Weech said the dark patches spotted in the ocean are more likely to be large clumps of dark seaweed drifting in the ocean than the oil slicks in the Gulf of Mexico, which they resemble.
"If there is oil in the Bahamas yet, we don't know," Mr Weech said.
"We have been getting a lot of calls and concerns of that nature and many are coming from the fact that people are seeing what they would normally see when they fly over, which is seaweed, which looks like what you see on the international news, but what we expect to see here would be weathered black tar balls.
"We are almost 800 miles away from the oil head so it's going to be a completely different scenario."
Oil sheens containing thousands of tar balls have hit the south coast of the United States in Mississippi, Louisianna, Alabama and Florida, and some reports claim these sheens have already left the Gulf.
The National Oil Spill Committee will spend five days in Cay Sal Banks, the westernmost point of the Bahamas 145km west of Andros Island, and Bimini, collecting oceanic and terrestrial samples to test on the RBDF vessel and determine whether or not oil has left the Gulf.
They will be assisted by trained volunteers from the College of the Bahamas, the Royal Bahamas Defence Force, the Department of Marine Resources, other government departments and environmental protection agencies who will continue sampling work in the northern Abaco cays and Grand Bahama.
More samples will be taken on the slower, more detailed exercise than the previous two-day expedition to Cay Sal last month which showed no signs of oil from the spill and have been stored in a tamper-free US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certified laboratory.
Committee spokesman and Bahamas National Trust (BNT) director Eric Carey said: "We are hearing so many conflicting reports, depending what website you look at, so we have spent a lot of time trying to get the best information available to us.
"One source said oil might be exiting the Gulf of Mexico in the form of tar balls already, so we are really anxious to see what the team finds when they get to Cay Sal, because some of the reports suggest tar might already be heading there."
The team of scientists include leading marine ecologist Dr Ethan Freid and marine biologist Kathleen Sealy from the International Maritime Organisation (IMO).
June 19, 2010
tribune242
Friday, June 18, 2010
Clogged Courts... Clogged Justice
Confusion around the courts
tribune242editorial:
NATIONAL Security Minister Tommy Turnquest told Parliament Wednesday that at least 252 persons charged with murder are still awaiting trial. Of that number about 130 are out on bail.
It would be interesting to know how many of those on bail have been charged with a second murder, or have themselves become the victim of another criminal's drive-by shooting. Up to April 30, 130 murder accused were still out on the streets waiting to be called in to face justice.
Lawyer Philip Davis told the House that a murder trial usually takes a month. He estimated that it would take more than 20 years to clear those now waiting for their cases to be heard. "A near impossible" task to deal with, he observed.
The courts are not only clogged with too many cases, but also cases cannot move smoothly and swiftly through the system because of constant delays, either for lack of witnesses, summonses that have not been served, or lawyers who need adjournments because of a conflict in their own calendars.
A businessman, who was to testify this week for a theft at his office, after waiting four hours outside court for the case to be called, vowed that in future unless death were involved, he would never again call in the police to get entangled in the judicial system. "It is ridiculous what happens at the court," he said.
He said his case was set down for Tuesday and Wednesday this week. He arrived at the court at 9.30am on Tuesday. There were so many prisoners already there that everyone was asked to leave the court to make room for them.
He waited with the crowd under the almond tree in front of Café Matisse to find some shelter from the blistering sun. Later he hurried under an awning to be protected from the rain. "I am a middle aged man in good health, but can you imagine what would happen to an older person, not in good health, under these conditions?" he asked. He battled with the sun and rain for four hours before his case was called. When he entered the court room at 1.30pm he was told: "Come back tomorrow."
The next day, he went even earlier to secure a seat at the back of the court. He said that a sympathetic policeman who knew what he had gone through the day before helped him find the seat. His case was the second to be called on Wednesday. He gave his evidence, but believes that there will be at least two more adjournments in the magistrate's court before the case can make it to the Supreme Court.
In the two days that he was there only two cases went ahead. About 40 had to be adjourned because either witnesses had not shown up, or summonses had not been served.
On Tuesday he said in one case alone 15 witnesses were called. Not one was present. Of the 30 cases that day, no one had shown up to give evidence. Each case had to be set down for a new date.
Even a prisoner complained about the non-functioning system. He told the court that that day was the fifth time that he had been brought before the court, but each time his case had been adjourned because no one was there. "This is ridiculous!" he exclaimed.
Also at no time did the businessman feel secure. He said there should be somewhere for witnesses to wait so that they do not have to be so near to the prisoners.
He said all the staff and the police at the court were friendly. However, it was obvious that the court was under staffed.
"It was a total eye opener for me to our criminal justice system," he said as he vowed never again to willingly expose himself to such an experience.
As for murder cases, Mr Turnquest told the House, government will specify an amendment to a bill now before parliament that three years is a reasonable time to hold murder accused in prison to await trial. In our own experience, we know of a case that involved the brutal murder in 2006 of one of our own staff members. The man accused of her murder was back on the streets after only 14 months. He is still a free man and no more has been heard of her case.
Under the constitution, said Mr Turnquest, a person accused of murder has a right to bail if they are not brought to trial in a reasonable time. With the slow pace at which many matters proceed before the courts this has allowed many charged with serious offences to be released on bail, sometimes coercing witnesses or committing other heinous crimes, he said.
"There's no question that the granting of bail to persons charged with murder is particularly controversial and emotive in our country. The public is concerned and rightly so that persons charged with murder are given bail and remain free to coerce, compel, and influence others and tragically to kill again," said Mr Turnquest.
"It is critical that more persons charged with murder have their cases decided by the courts and we believe that this Bill is a step in the right direction," he said.
We suggest that a court be designated just for murder cases with its own staff to bring in the witnesses and keep the cases moving through the system.
June 18, 2010
tribune242
tribune242editorial:
NATIONAL Security Minister Tommy Turnquest told Parliament Wednesday that at least 252 persons charged with murder are still awaiting trial. Of that number about 130 are out on bail.
It would be interesting to know how many of those on bail have been charged with a second murder, or have themselves become the victim of another criminal's drive-by shooting. Up to April 30, 130 murder accused were still out on the streets waiting to be called in to face justice.
Lawyer Philip Davis told the House that a murder trial usually takes a month. He estimated that it would take more than 20 years to clear those now waiting for their cases to be heard. "A near impossible" task to deal with, he observed.
The courts are not only clogged with too many cases, but also cases cannot move smoothly and swiftly through the system because of constant delays, either for lack of witnesses, summonses that have not been served, or lawyers who need adjournments because of a conflict in their own calendars.
A businessman, who was to testify this week for a theft at his office, after waiting four hours outside court for the case to be called, vowed that in future unless death were involved, he would never again call in the police to get entangled in the judicial system. "It is ridiculous what happens at the court," he said.
He said his case was set down for Tuesday and Wednesday this week. He arrived at the court at 9.30am on Tuesday. There were so many prisoners already there that everyone was asked to leave the court to make room for them.
He waited with the crowd under the almond tree in front of Café Matisse to find some shelter from the blistering sun. Later he hurried under an awning to be protected from the rain. "I am a middle aged man in good health, but can you imagine what would happen to an older person, not in good health, under these conditions?" he asked. He battled with the sun and rain for four hours before his case was called. When he entered the court room at 1.30pm he was told: "Come back tomorrow."
The next day, he went even earlier to secure a seat at the back of the court. He said that a sympathetic policeman who knew what he had gone through the day before helped him find the seat. His case was the second to be called on Wednesday. He gave his evidence, but believes that there will be at least two more adjournments in the magistrate's court before the case can make it to the Supreme Court.
In the two days that he was there only two cases went ahead. About 40 had to be adjourned because either witnesses had not shown up, or summonses had not been served.
On Tuesday he said in one case alone 15 witnesses were called. Not one was present. Of the 30 cases that day, no one had shown up to give evidence. Each case had to be set down for a new date.
Even a prisoner complained about the non-functioning system. He told the court that that day was the fifth time that he had been brought before the court, but each time his case had been adjourned because no one was there. "This is ridiculous!" he exclaimed.
Also at no time did the businessman feel secure. He said there should be somewhere for witnesses to wait so that they do not have to be so near to the prisoners.
He said all the staff and the police at the court were friendly. However, it was obvious that the court was under staffed.
"It was a total eye opener for me to our criminal justice system," he said as he vowed never again to willingly expose himself to such an experience.
As for murder cases, Mr Turnquest told the House, government will specify an amendment to a bill now before parliament that three years is a reasonable time to hold murder accused in prison to await trial. In our own experience, we know of a case that involved the brutal murder in 2006 of one of our own staff members. The man accused of her murder was back on the streets after only 14 months. He is still a free man and no more has been heard of her case.
Under the constitution, said Mr Turnquest, a person accused of murder has a right to bail if they are not brought to trial in a reasonable time. With the slow pace at which many matters proceed before the courts this has allowed many charged with serious offences to be released on bail, sometimes coercing witnesses or committing other heinous crimes, he said.
"There's no question that the granting of bail to persons charged with murder is particularly controversial and emotive in our country. The public is concerned and rightly so that persons charged with murder are given bail and remain free to coerce, compel, and influence others and tragically to kill again," said Mr Turnquest.
"It is critical that more persons charged with murder have their cases decided by the courts and we believe that this Bill is a step in the right direction," he said.
We suggest that a court be designated just for murder cases with its own staff to bring in the witnesses and keep the cases moving through the system.
June 18, 2010
tribune242
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)