Monday, October 17, 2011

Branville McCartney - Democratic National Alliance (DNA) leader says Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham is a bully, and Progressive Liberal Party leader Perry Christie a wimp

McCartney lashes out at Christie, Ingraham

By Candia Dames
Guardian News Editor
candia@nasguard.com



Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham’s recent comments on Bamboo Town and Democratic National Alliance (DNA) leader Branville McCartney last week might have been a sure sign that election season is heating up.

At a recent reception at Workers House for DNA candidate Alfred Poitier — the DNA’s candidate for Kennedy — McCartney called Ingraham a bully and Progressive Liberal Party leader Perry Christie a wimp.

“I don’t want my children to watch my prime minister any more,” McCartney told DNA supporters.

“Can you imagine?  Shame on you, prime minister.  The game is over.”

Speaking in the House of Assembly last week, Ingraham said McCartney was not in his or Christie’s league and that if the Free National Movement does not win Bamboo Town then the Progressive Liberal Party would.

Ingraham also said that when he was a young MP, he was arrogant and had hard mouth, but was able to back up everything he told then Prime Minister Sir Lynden Pindling about taking on the Progressive Liberal Party.

At his political meeting, McCartney said, “At the end of the day he talks about backing up.  He called Mr. Pindling out and said this and said that.  But I don’t care what he said to Mr. Pindling 20 odd years ago.

“...He could not back up the crime problem, reduce the crime problem, he could not back up the illegal immigration problem and he could not back up what we have with this economy today.

“He has no answers.  He is void of answer.  He could not back up at the end of the day our broken education system.  He could not back up the issues.  He could back up his mouth.

“All he is is a big bully and Mr. Perry Christie sat back and took it like a little wimp.”

McCartney has previously suggested that he might not run in Bamboo Town, a seat he won as an FNM candidate in 2007.

He said last week that the good thing about being leader of the DNA is he could decide which constituency he runs in.

The PLP did not contest the Bamboo Town seat in 2002 or 2007, but will be running Renward Wells in that constituency in the next general election.  Wells is a former executive of the National Development Party.

Former Bahamas Democratic Movement leader Cassius Stuart is expected to be the FNM’s candidate for Bamboo Town.

Ingraham has suggested that McCartney would be competing in his league with those two candidates as his competitors.

The prime minister also referred to Bamboo Town as “my things” and said McCartney was not going anywhere with it.


Oct 17, 2011

thenassauguardian

Sunday, October 16, 2011

I used to love and admire the PM with an unbridled affection... Time however, alters many, if not all delusions and cases of infatuation... It is always painful to realize that the object of one's passion is yet another individual made of brittle clay... Realistic decisions are not being made in my perspective and not enough, if anything, is being done to heal the national wounds

Decision points and healing the wounds


By Staff Writer For the Guardian




It is a given that the nation is in a polarized state.  The art of class warfare is alive and well.

Divisions abound among our people and The Bahamas is lurching from pillar to post.  All however, is not yet lost and we need not at this time, write the obituary of our beautiful country.  Yes, there are a number of serious challenges and more than enough societal and economic 'barbarians' at the proverbial gates.

It is my humble submission however, that if we take a less politically tribal approach, most of what ails us can be cured.  Let us take a close look at crime, its alleged causes and suggested solutions.  While we are at it, let us not neglect to figure out why our infrastructural work in New Providence is in such shambles.  Of course, we must also ask the hard question: Is the prime minister up to the daunting tasks which confront him?

Crime and the fear of crime are literally killing The Bahamas.  Far too many misguided persons have lambasted the current minister of national security and sought to blame him for the state of crime in our nation.  Is this fair?  Crime begins within the inner mind of an individual.  It is absolutely impossible for the minister or police to enter the mind of an individual and determine, in advance, if he will commit or is considering committing a crime.

We must find the ways and means to encourage rehabilitation and the literal transformation of the thought processes of recalcitrant anti-social individuals, especially the youthful ones.  A dedicated form or system of 'urban renewal' must be implemented in short order, by whatever name you wish.  All of this unnecessary politically charged 'in your face' must cease and desist.

The state of our major roads in New Providence is poor.  The permanent secretary and the substantive minister of works are, apparently, oblivious to the gridlock which the road builder has created by the disjointed schedule of work.  Traffic congestion is extremely frustrating and has led to a massive decrease in productivity.

Why not fix or rehabilitate one road at a time?  Why not deploy the traffic and other police officers in the known hot spots instead of having large numbers of them hanging around, looking pretty and doing absolutely nothing?  What is the commissioner of police saying or doing about this?  In fact, where is he?

The prime minister used to have the fire in his belly, so to speak, but, I postulate that he has long ago lost it.  He seems to be on cruise control as is, apparently, the nation at large.  A slew of potentially bogus bills were recently presented in the House of Assembly.  The PM is well aware that these are not going anywhere any time soon.

No doubt, the right honorable gentleman and his hapless colleagues on the front bench mean well, but the road to hell, historically, has always been paved with good intentions and a massive dose of shaving cream.  Nothing has changed.

To attempt, perhaps unconstitutionally, to impose minimum and maximum punishment guidelines and to agree to a parliamentary inquiry into the effectiveness of the Royal Bahamas Police Force due to public hysterics is not progressive or conducive to nation-building.

What will such attempts do to the independence and effectiveness of the judiciary?  What will they do to the overall morale of the police force?  Is the veil between the separation of the three branches of government being lifted and if so, what will the lasting repercussions be?  Talking what might appear, or be designed to appear as 'a good talk' is one thing.  To drag the judiciary and the police into the harsh and glaring arena of politics is another.

The PM's shelf life may well be at an ignoble end.  Like he would have shouted at his greatest benefactor and mentor, publicly in the honorable House of Assembly not too many years ago: “It is time to go.”  Does that same unwarranted outburst now apply to him?

I used to love and admire the PM with an unbridled affection.  Time however, alters many, if not all delusions and cases of infatuation.  It is always painful to realize that the object of one's passion is yet another individual made of brittle clay.  Realistic decisions are not being made in my perspective and not enough, if anything, is being done to heal the national wounds.

To God then, in all of these mundane things be the glory.

Oct 10, 2011

thenassauguardian

Saturday, October 15, 2011

...five years after the May 02, 2007 general election, Bahamians face a new round with a decisive man at the top... It is now up to the electorate to decide whether they are going to entrust their future to a leader of indecision, or one of decision

FNM and PLP prepare for an election

tribune242 editorial


ON MONDAY, Prime Minister Ingraham announced the appointment of the Constituencies (Boundaries) Commission, which is expected to make its recommendations to Parliament by the end of this year with voters' cards ready for issue by early in the New Year.

By October 7, 134,000 voters had already registered in the 41 electoral constituencies for the 2012 election. They are still registering. However, the Boundaries Commission now has sufficient numbers to study the shifts in population in the various constituencies, and make recommendations to government on how the boundaries should be drawn for this election.

The Constitution provides for a minimum of 38 House members. Presently there are 41 (one extra seat added by the PLP in 2007), and so, if the population shifts warrant it, at least three constituencies can be eliminated and merged.

What a difference five years can make with a decisive prime minister at the helm.

At this time five years ago, then Prime Minister Perry Christie was still dithering. He had not yet announced the close of the register, because of the poor turnout of citizens. By November 2006 just over 63,000 voters had registered in New Providence out of a projected 120,000 voters.

According to Mr Christie, he could not close the register because Bahamians were not registering fast enough, which resulted in him not being able to appoint a Boundaries Commission to decide electoral boundaries.

On March 22, 2007 Mr Christie said that there were compelling reasons why the work of the commission had to be delayed, which had nothing to do with inaction by the commission or the government.

"Instead," he said, "the delay, regrettably as it was, was the direct result of the very slow process of Bahamians registering to vote."

By comparison, Mr Ingraham announced this week that by the first week in January 2012 the Parliamentary Registration Department is expected to start the distribution of voters' cards. By the same time five years ago Mr Christie was still begging Bahamians to register so that the Commission could make a decision on the boundaries.

Apparently, Mr Christie refused to recognise that many Bahamians are very much like him -- slow to decide and even slower to act. Although Mr Christie was advised to announce a closure date early in 2006 for the 2007 election -- as Mr Ingraham had done earlier this year for the 2012 election -- he refused to do so. He was told that the only way to get Bahamians to move was to fix a date -- the floodgates would open, and registration offices would be filled. This seemed to take an extra long time for Mr Christie to compute and so three months before the 2007 election the Boundaries Commissioners were still floundering -- still nothing to report. It was only on the morning of March 19, 2007 - two months before the election - that Mr Christie presented the House with the Boundaries report.

It did not take a genius to predict that the 2007 election was going to be one of confusion. Up to that point political candidates were not even certain of their districts. First Bahamians were blamed because they were too slow to register. And naturally at the end of the day, someone else had to be blamed for the inevitable confusion that was to follow when voting did start. Naturally, the poor Parliamentary Commissioner, through no fault of his own, had to be the fall guy for the indecision at the top.

Here it was March 19, 2007 with Mr Christie standing before the House with the Boundaries Commissions report to be presented. One of the Commissioner's signatures was missing -- that of Brent Symonette, the only Opposition member on the committee. Mr Symonette had refused to sign because the PLP members had shunted him aside, treating his opinion with complete contempt. This will not happen this year as Mr Symonette, again appointed to the Commission, is one of the two members representing the government.

At this point in 2007, the Constitution was closing in on Mr Christie. If he didn't do his famous two-step shuffle quickly, on May 22 Parliament would automatically dissolve itself without him.

It was a huffing and a puffing to the finish line, which was eventually announced for May 2. The results were inevitable - the FNM won 23 of the 41 seats with the PLP winning the other 18. And now five years later Bahamians face a new election with a decisive man at the top. It is now up to the electorate to decide whether they are going to entrust their future to a leader of indecision, or one of decision.

It is only a matter of months before Bahamians are called upon to make that decision.

October 12, 2011

tribune242 editorial

Friday, October 14, 2011

Is it Bran? ...What should we make of Mr. Branville McCartney and the Democratic National Alliance (DNA) party? ...Can we take them seriously? ...Are they really the contenders they insist they are or that many believe they are? ...Or are they just another passing fad, destined to go the way of the CDR, BDM, and NDP, just with a lot more wasted money and energy?

Gone Green?


Branville McCartney

By Ian G. Strachan



Most Bahamians would welcome new personalities at the helm of our two major parties. Inspired by the election of Barack Obama, they dream of political renewal in this country ushered by some eloquent, able visionary who will bring the nation to a sense of unity and purpose we haven’t felt in a generation.

Though Hubert Ingraham and Barack Obama share the same birthday, the men represent very different things in the minds of the people. The loquacious Perry Christie is likewise, unable to sustain such a comparison.  And though I will grant that Obama has in no way been as successful as many hoped he would be, we are talking here about what he represented in the imagination of Americans, black and white, and what he represented to the world: rebirth, a change from politics as usual.  That was the dream he sold.  Where is our Obama then?

Is it Bran?  What should we make of Mr. Branville McCartney and the Democratic National Alliance?  Can we take them seriously?  Are they really the contenders they insist they are or that many believe they are?  Or are they just another passing fad, destined to go the way of the CDR, BDM, and NDP, just with a lot more wasted money and energy?

Are we looking at the next government of The Bahamas, the next page in Bahamian history, the revolution we’ve all been waiting for, the wave of change that will sweep away all that we’re weary of in public affairs?  Or are we looking at the elaborate and glorious endgame of an inexperienced, over-eager and over-rated politician and his rag-tag band of hangers on?

Whichever it is, one thing is certain: in a very short space of time Bran McCartney has become one of the most popular and most talked about politicians in the country.  ‘Going Green’ was never as popular a statement as it is now, except it has nothing to do with environmental conservation.

I’m a resident of the Bamboo Town constituency (for the time being).   I can say that as a candidate and as a representative, McCartney is enthusiastic and active.   It was clear during the ’07 campaign that he enjoyed the opportunity he was being given and he was determined to make the most of it.  Could he have beaten Frank Smith if he had run in St. Thomas More instead?  Ingraham didn’t seem to think so.  But I’ll say this: before McCartney, Bamboo Town had never enjoyed the kind of attention paid to it by this representative.

The parties for the elderly, the community bus, the various educational and outreach programs emanating out of the constituency office, all demonstrate that McCartney was and is prepared to take ham and turkey politics to the next level.  Is the work he is doing in Bamboo Town what I think an MP ought to be doing?  No.  I believe a community center, government and volunteer staffed, ought to be doing that work permanently in Bamboo Town and every constituency in fact.  As it stands, that work is happening so long as McCartney is MP.  What happens after he is not?

Once McCartney was elected and was able to escape the confines of the Ministry of Tourism and Aviation, he found himself in an ideal position to showcase his abilities (or at least to showcase his ambitions).  Now there is nothing wrong with ambition in and of itself; and there’s nothing intrinsically wrong with being opportunistic.  The problem is always how far you’re prepared to go and what you are prepared to do or say to get what you want.

And McCartney showed that he would miss no opportunity to call attention to himself, and to zealously hunt down illegals and ship them out.  He did for Immigration what Ron Pinder did for garbage collection, which is a disturbing but apropos comparison, given what we think of Haitians.

There was Bran in fatigues, there was Bran bidding people farewell as they boarded a plane to be repatriated, there was Bran in the helicopter showing us where those shantytowns were located, there was Bran feeding the people at the Nassau dump . . .  It was shameless.  But here’s the thing: I am probably in the minority for thinking so. Many, maybe most Bahamians, were impressed, cheered, celebrated, thought he was fantastic.  It seems far too easy to impress Bahamian voters, but there you have it.

More on Bran and the DNA, next week.

Oct 10, 2011

Gone Green? - Part 2

thenassauguardian

Thursday, October 13, 2011

Renward Wells; the PLP candidate, and Cassius Stuart; the FNM candidate, both said Democratic National Alliance (DNA) leader Branville McCartney has no chance of retaining his Bamboo Town seat in the 2012 general election

RIVALS SAY THEY DO NOT FEAR RISK OF LOSING TO DNA


By SANCHESKA BROWN
Tribune Staff Reporter
sbrown@tribunemedia.net


THE PROGRESSIVE Liberal Party and Free National Movement candidates for Bamboo Town said they are not concerned about the possibility of losing to incumbent, Branville McCartney.

When asked what they thought their chances were in Bamboo Town, Renward Wells, the PLP candidate, and Cassius Stuart, the FNM candidate, both said DNA leader Mr McCartney has no chance of retaining his seat.

Mr Wells said: "I don't think its going to be a close race at all. In fact, I am going to win by more than 50 per cent of the vote. Mr McCartney will be pleasantly surprised.

"I know Bamboo Town has been FNM since 1987 but that was because of Tennyson Wells. Mr Wells convinced them that FNM was the better party and now I will convince them that PLP is the way to go.

"Cassius Stuart is my biggest competition, we are both cut from the same cloth. Mr McCartney will be easy to beat."

Mr Stuart agreed that Mr McCartney is no competition and said he won't even get one per cent of the vote.

"Everyone who stood with Mr McCartney now stands with me. He has some support but it is nothing significant," he said.

"The people are tired of persons being elected on the FNM ticket then abandoning them for their own personal interests.

"They always knew Mr McCartney had an ulterior motive because he painted his constituency office green and not red.

"I am going to knock Bran out. The only running he'll be doing is out of Bamboo Town."

The comments from both men came after Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham said Bamboo Town is a "test case" to see which one of the men will emerge as the winner.

He said: "I have taken two gentlemen who wanted to be leaders and put them up as candidates.

"There is another member there, in the person of the Member of Parliament for Bamboo Town, who wants to be a leader."

He added: "We have asked them to fight in their league down there to see which one of them is eligible to be leader. You have to win first."

For his part, Mr McCartney said the fact that the three men, two of whom were at one point leaders of third parties, are running in the same constituency is no coincidence.

He said: "The whole thing is a ploy for Mr Ingraham and Mr Christie to get Renward Wells and Cassius Stuart out of the way to stop them from joining forces.

"They planned this whole thing from the beginning to put us against each other."

The prime minister has indicated that he will not cut the boundaries of Bamboo Town - even if the Boundaries Commission recommends it.

October 12, 2011

tribune242

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham's crime address: ... He seized the national imagination by urging a new era of national volunteerism, inclusive of enhanced community service programs for thousands of students in the government school system

A new era of volunteerism


Front Porch


By Simon



Crime Bahamas

Last week, in response to what he described as an intolerable level of crime and “the most pressing issue in our nation”, Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham addressed the country.  It may be one of the more important addresses of his political career, and not for the reason some may suspect.

Though critical for various reasons including politically, the prime minister did something even more compelling and far-sighted.  In tone and text, he demonstrated that he understood the national mood and deep worry at the level of crime and the need to address its root causes.

He addressed the soul of crime, speaking to the fears and hopes of Bahamians.

Only the most churlish and the inveterate Ingraham-haters would deny that he spoke from the heart, the latter point noted by a woman who lost a family member to murder.

Moreover, the prime minister elevated the national conversation on crime and violence from finger-pointing to shared responsibility.

And he did something even more compelling: He seized the national imagination by urging a new era of national volunteerism, inclusive of enhanced community service programs for thousands of students in the government school system.

Ingraham also called for a renewed civic compact to address the desire not only for safety and security, but more broadly for community and social peace.  His call to action was issued to parents and teachers, civil society and the business community, as well as to the nation’s youth.

In the lead up and the immediate response to the half-hour address, the prime minister’s critics stumbled badly, misreading the deep concern over crime as a moment for political posturing, pandering and gamesmanship.

 

STUNT MODE

DNA Leader Branville McCartney, in typical publicity stunt mode, showed up for a press conference with a gimmick graph in the background.  Unconvincingly, it showed the level of crime, long in the making and with multiple causes, falling precipitously under the DNA.

Also unconvincing was  McCartney’s tough guy performance after the address.

He shot down the idea of a gun amnesty as if it was the only proposed measure on guns, and bemoaned that the prime minister’s ideas appeared not to have any teeth.

His assertion was at stark variance with that of the Police Staff Association, which praised the address and whose members are actually on the frontline, battling crime.

One measure with additional teeth is the expansion of CCTV monitoring in New Providence, a measure advocated and applauded by the high command of the police force.

So predictable was the post-address press release issued by the PLP that it easily could have been written before the prime minister spoke.  Using the hackneyed phrase, “too little, too late”, too liberally, too quickly, the Opposition misjudged the public’s mood and overwhelmingly positive reaction to the speech.

In all likelihood, though few Bahamians may remember what the Leader of the Opposition said in his crime address just a few months ago, many may recall a general impression with which they were left.  It was the suspicion that they were hearing familiar promises, few of which they remember being fulfilled.

There was also the suspicion that the Leader of the Opposition was offering a jumble of slogans.  In an editorial the day after the prime minister spoke, The Nassau Guardian opined in reference to recent pronouncements by the Opposition:

“Coherent and plausible plans on crime and the economy actually do not need quirky names.  They simply need to work and have the will of a competent government behind them.

“When a party announces multiple named programs at every speaking engagement, and it does not explain how they would be paid for, who would lead them and if they have been fully planned out, that party could come across as less than serious.”

 

LEAPFROGGED

Two days after the crime address, tech-revolutionary and Apple Founder, Steve Jobs died.  Jobs leapfrogged his competitors with devices and software which went beyond tinkering with existing operating systems and gadgets.

In his own way, Prime Minister Ingraham has essentially done the same by proposing significant innovations in social policy.  The Opposition proposed Urban Renewal 2.0 if returned to office.  The ambitious and impressive range of social intervention measures offered by Ingraham is more like Community and Urban Renewal 10.0.

With the prime minister superceding the Opposition’s proposal by a wide magnitude, it looked foolish by calling his proposals “reasonable”.  This is akin to the Sony Corporation calling the iPad a “reasonable” improvement on its Walkman introduced in 1979.  The next generation of social intervention innovations proposed by the Ingraham administration offers a variety of key features.

They include: the development of an Outward Bound-type program; a National Volunteers Register; the expansion of community service-learning in government schools; support for additional initiatives in urban areas geared towards young men; greater support for alternative sentencing programs like that offered by groups such as the Peace and Justice Institute of the Bahamas Conference of the Methodist Church, among others.

Ingraham was clear that it takes more than government action to address the roots of crime and anti-social behavior.  To support his administration’s initiatives, he proposed the expansion of public-private partnerships and collaboration calling on faith-based groups, NGOs, corporate citizens and philanthropists to help craft, manage and fund such initiatives.

 

NEW ERA

His call for a new era of volunteerism recognizes the critical need for citizen-volunteers to help to bring about social change while addressing crime and violence.  In essence, his was a message of “we the people”.  One of the more novel initiatives proposed is for an Outward Bound-type program.

Outward Bound is an experiential outdoor learning program with great success in youth development, including for at-risk youth.  Its well-tested model has helped transform the lives of thousands, inclusive of practical and customized courses “developed for struggling teens [and] groups with specific health, social or educational needs”.

Outward Bound or a similar program has the extraordinary potential to re-socialize and effectively intervene into the lives of young men and women, replacing destructive mindsets and behavior with healthier lifestyles and attitudes.

Its potential may extend to young people involved in gang activity, as well as residents of “the Simpson Penn and Willamae Pratt facilities with a view to improving the results being achieved in preparing these young people for reintegration into the community with skills to pursue productive lives.”  It may also involve students enrolled in the Ministry of Education’s SURE program.

The National Volunteer Register “will enable Bahamians to sign up to be available to volunteer their time for mentoring our young men and women; assisting in community centers with afterschool programs; outreaches to urban neighborhoods to encourage parental and child involvement in school activities; to work with existing youth organizations in their programs; and a host of social activities that can positively impact upon our society.”

The revamping of community service programs in government schools with an emphasis on ethics, service learning and character development holds considerable promise.  The Prime Minister noted that implementation of a more comprehensive community service model is intended to help, “more young people develop a sense of belonging in our community, and [a] deeper sense of responsibility for its well-being, while better respecting themselves and others.”

With the National Volunteers Register and a new community service-learning model, Prime Minister Ingraham has launched a new era of volunteerism redefining national service and fulfilling a dream long-held by various leaders.

Sir Lynden Pindling often spoke of a version of national service that was more paramilitary in nature and mandatory for youth between certain ages.  Mr. Ingraham’s version is voluntary, more practical and extends to every age group.

It holds the promise of becoming a singular accomplishment of national development and one of Mr. Ingraham’s greater achievements, as well as a milestone of progressive governance.

frontporchguardian@gmail.com

www.bahamapundit.com

Oct 11, 2011

thenassauguardian

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

PLP Senator Jerome Fitzgerald: ..."irrefutable facts" and "visual evidence of the undeniable and large scale destruction being wreaked on the environment at and around Bell Island." ...in the Exuma Cays Land and Sea Park

WAR OF WORDS OVER BELL ISLAND


By CELESTE NIXON
Tribune Staff Reporter
cnixon@tribunemedia.net



ENVIRONMENT Minister Earl Deveaux fired back at PLP Senator Jerome Fitzgerald's criticisms of the Bell Island development claiming his "words cannot be trusted".

Mr Deveaux said the Bell Island dredging is constantly monitored and the implementation of the Environmental Management Plan continues to ensure the highest environmental standards.

Last week, Senator Fitzgerald held a press conference urgently calling on the government to monitor dredging around Bell Island to limit the destruction he claims it is causing in the Exuma Cays Land and Sea Park.

According to Mr Fitzgerald some 13 acres, or 600,000 sq ft of the sea bed has been excavated from Conch Cut south of Bell Island, to make way for the inland marina, destroying the habitats of numerous marine animals, including lobster and conch.

However, in his statement Mr Deveaux said Mr Fitzgerald's estimates are "far wrong" and that less than five acres of natural area is being affected by excavations.

He added that areas for the yacht basin and barge landing are a third of what Mr Fitzgerald claims is being destroyed.

Similar to the senator's criticisms of Saunders Beach last year, which were proven wrong, he is again using "emotive and incendiary words to inflame the public," Mr Deveaux said.

Last year Mr Fitzgerald blamed the "destructive" erosion of Saunders Beach on the excavations being done for the Arawak Cay extension. Mr Deveaux argued that the erosion had been caused by the usual weather pattern at that time of year and had nothing to do with the excavations.

When the winter weather changed, and the pounding waves, driven by high winds ceased, the sand would return, the Minister had said.

Mr Fitzgerald replied that if the beach did not return by June 30 of that year the public would expect Mr Deveaux to resign. The beach returned as predicted.

As for Bell Island, said Mr Deveaux, activity is constantly monitored by an on site Environmental Manager. The manager produces daily reports and is fully empowered to stop works that are not in compliance with the project's Environmental Management Plan (EMP).

Further, Mr Deveaux said, the Exuma Parks Warden is a frequent visitor to the island along with senior government officials led by the BEST Commission who "maintain ongoing interactive input on the works."

In addition to a native plant nursery in charge of regenerating and replanting indigenous plant species, Mr Deveaux said employees as well as divers from Black Point find, identify and relocate conch impacted by dredging.

In response to Mr Deveaux's statement Mr Fitzgerald issued a press release defending his comments on what he described as "irrefutable facts" and "visual evidence of the undeniable and large scale destruction being wreaked on the environment at and around Bell Island."

The Dredging Permit given by the Department of Physical Planning on September 23, 2010 allows for the developer of Bell Island to dredge 13.1 acres said Mr Fitzgerald.

He said: "The uncertainty in each and every statement proved either he (Mr Deveaux) doesn't really know what is going on at Bell Island or he doesn't care."

Reiterating his previous statement Mr Fitzgerald claims the development is not being monitored properly, nor is it complying with EIA and the EMP.

In his statement, Mr Fitzgerald challenged the government to make public evidence of the size of current excavations, permits and other documents pertaining to the project.

"I again implore the government, the Minister and the relevant environmental agencies to get a handle on the environmental destruction which is taking place at Bell Island due to lack of safeguards mandated by the BEST Commission and provided for in the EMP," said Mr Fitzgerald.

October 10, 2011

tribune242