Showing posts with label Penal Code Bahamas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Penal Code Bahamas. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

Nassau, N.P., The Bahamas: ABOUT THE SMUGGLING OF MIGRANTS BILL




Press release Bahamas government

Government of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas - STATEMENT ON FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT THE SMUGGLING OF MIGRANTS BILL



This is the first time that a Government of The Bahamas is putting a clear, stand alone crime of migrant smuggling into our law.  At present, our Penal Code does not give prosecutors a direct charge for smuggling of migrants.  They must piece together charges under the Penal Code and the Customs and Immigration Acts, which leaves much of the behaviour and methods used by smugglers outside the reach of the courts.


This Bill closes that gap and gives prosecutors and enforcement agencies a strong, modern legal tool to fight the smuggling of migrants and, with it, illegal immigration.


Against this background, the Government of The Bahamas rejects the false and reckless claims being made by Lincoln Bain about the Smuggling of Migrants Bill, 2025.  His comments mislead Bahamians about what the Bill actually does and create unnecessary fear about the safety of our borders.


The Bill leaves the Immigration Act fully in place.  Illegal landing, overstaying and related breaches of immigration law remain criminal offences.  Immigration officers keep their full authority to detain, process and remove people who enter or remain in The Bahamas in breach of our laws.


The purpose of the Bill is to go after the criminal networks that organise and profit from moving people illegally across borders.  Under section 5, a person who commits the offence of smuggling migrants is, on summary conviction, liable to a fine up to S100,000 or imprisonment up to seven years, or both.


On conviction on information, that person is liable to a fine up to $200,000 - imprisonment up to ten years, or both.  Where the smuggling involves aggravated conduct such as endangering life, violence, exploitation, abuse or similar acts, section 5(5) increases the penalties.


In such aggravated cases, on summary conviction the court may impose a fine up to $250,000 or imprisonment up to seven years, or both.  On conviction on information the court may impose a fine up to $300,000 or imprisonment up to fifteen years, or both.


In addition, where the offender owns the aircraft, vessel or vehicle used in the crime, that asset is liable to seizure and forfeiture and the court may impose a further fine up to three thousand dollars for each migrant smuggled.


The clause being circulated by Mr. Bain deals with smuggled migrants as victims and witnesses of this crime.  It simply prevents a victim from being charged under this new anti-smuggling law for acts that arise directly from being smuggled, such as illegal entry or possession of a fraudulent document supplied by the smuggler.


Immigration authorities remain free to act under the Immigration Act, including detention and removal.  There is no wording in the Bill that grants permanent residence, citizenship, or any fast-track to Bahamian status.


The Bill requires only basic, short-term humanitarian care for people in state custody, such as food, shelter and urgent medical attention.  That standard reflects our Constitution, our Christian faith and our international obligations.


It does not create long-term welfare benefits and it does not interfere with removal procedures.


Irregular migration and border control demand serious, honest leadership.  The Government of The Bahamas remains firmly committed to strong borders, tough penalties for smugglers and humane treatment of every person in our custody.


Bahamians can be confident that the Smuggling of Migrants Bill strengthens national security and gives our law enforcement officers stronger tools to break the smuggling networks that threaten our country.


December 2, 2025

Commonwealth of The Bahamas


Friday, September 23, 2011

Despite the regularity of the issuance of the death sentence, executions are uncommon in The Bahamas... There has not been a hanging in The Islands since David Mitchell was executed on January 6, 2000

Realistic about the death penalty


thenassauguardian editorial



Execution remains the most severe punishment prescribed by the state for the crimes of murder and treason.  The punishment of death is regularly issued in The Bahamas against those who murder. Treason prosecutions are virtually non-existent.

Despite the regularity of the issuance of the death sentence, executions are uncommon.  There has not been a hanging in The Bahamas since David Mitchell was executed on January 6, 2000.

In the 1993 Pratt and Morgan ruling, Her Majesty’s Privy Council ruled that it would be cruel and inhuman to execute a murder convict more than five years after the death sentence was issued.

This ruling was intended to protect the innocent and various civil liberties.  But it has had unintended consequences.

The ruling has slowed the execution process.  Murder trials take a long time to come up in this country and the appeals process after the death sentence is issued also takes years.

The country hanged 50 men since 1929, according to records kept at Her Majesty's Prison.  Five of them were hanged under the first two Ingraham administrations (1992-2002); 13 were hanged under the 25-year rule of the Pindling government (1967-1992); and the remainder were executed between 1929 and 1967.

In 2006, the Privy Council also issued a ruling, stating that the section of the Penal Code requiring a sentence of death be passed on any defendant convicted of murder "should be construed as imposing a discretionary and not a mandatory sentence of death."

The government has acknowledged that hangings are unlikely considering the five-year rule and the amount of time it takes for the appeals process to take place.  However, despite this acknowledgment, capital punishment remains a legal punishment.

This commentary is not intended to offer an opinion on whether or not capital punishment is a fair or reasonable punishment.  There are good arguments for and against hangings.

What is clear is that it is virtually impossible for the death sentence to be carried out.  And appeals against the sentence add to the backlog of cases before various courts.  If the five-year rule remains, we need to end the death penalty for practical reasons.

The appeals waste time and money.

Anecdotally, the majority of Bahamians appear in favor of executions.  This includes many of the powerful and vocal Christian clerics.  Governments fear even raising the issue of ending the death penalty.

As we all consider ways to reduce the number of matters before the court in order to make the criminal justice system more efficient, we must put this issue up for debate.  Emotionalism is useless.  The facts are the facts.  Hangings, though desired by many, are unlikely.

Bahamians want to understand what is going on.  And they want action.

We are eager to learn the details of the government’s legislative plan to address the definition of the length of a life sentence when Parliament resumes next month.

As long as the Privy Council rule remains in effect, murderers will appeal and appeal until the time for execution has past.

We must be realistic and accept that the days of execution in The Bahamas are over.

Sep 22, 2011

thenassauguardian editorial