A political blog about Bahamian politics in The Bahamas, Bahamian Politicans - and the entire Bahamas political lot. Bahamian Blogger Dennis Dames keeps you updated on the political news and views throughout the islands of The Bahamas without fear or favor. Bahamian Politicians and the Bahamian Political Arena: Updates one Post at a time on Bahamas Politics and Bahamas Politicans; and their local, regional and international policies and perspectives.
Saturday, December 20, 2025
A National Agenda for The Bahamas
Tuesday, December 16, 2025
Rick Fox is not hiding in The Bahamas
The Future of The Bahamas
Bahamians Deserve More Than Silence
Many have asked: Which party are you joining None. Not yet.
Not because I'm undecided but because silence is still masquerading as governance.
People Are Worried
An estimated 350,000 Haitian nationals face the termination of Temporary Protected Status in the United States in the coming months.
People are already worried. They're just afraid to ask.
When decisions of that scale are announced, nations in the region have a right to ask what preparedness looks like. Not because panic is inevitable, but because planning is responsible.
What does the US Government know that they aren't telling us?
What does The Bahamas Government know that they haven't shared?
Why the rush? Why the silence? What's coming?
These questions don't undermine national security. They strengthen public trust.
Urgency Without Explanation Breeds Distrust.
Last week, Parliament passed a Smuggling of Migrants Act at lightning speed.
Urgency? Absolutely. Sovereignty matters. Preparedness matters. But transparency matters too.
We are a nation of 400,000 citizens. What happens when 350,000 asylum seekers need a place to go? When does enforcement begin? What are the routes? What guarantees that The Bahamas won't become a spillover zone?
What troubled many Bahamians - was not that action was taken, but that it was taken with minimal public briefing, no visible capacity assessment, and little dialogue about downstream impact.
When governments move quickly but refuse to explain their thinking, citizens have every right to ask why. That silence doesn't calm people. It unsettles them.
The Pattern Is Repeated With Our Elections.
This same silence appears again most troublingly in how we approach our elections.
Since the by-election, I have asked every party the same questions. We are still waiting.
Will you commit to a National Day of Voting so no Bahamian has to choose between democracy and survival?
Will you increase transparency in ballot handling and counting so trust is earned, not demanded?
Will you guarantee secret, secure, verified votes? One person, one vote, one time.
Will you commit to addressing these issues before calling the next general election?
These aren't partisan requests.
They are baseline requirements for trust.
What is concerning is not disagreement on their part, it is refusal to even engage - on borders and on ballots. On what matters most their silence can no longer be the answer.
Why I Haven't Chosen a Party?
I won't offer loyalty to a system that treats transparency as a threat. I won't choose sides when neither side is willing to state its position.
This is not avoidance - it is accountability.
I have been open about my interest in serving. I have been honest about my questions, my values, and the seriousness with which I am approaching this moment.
I am not hiding. I am listening. I am learning.
And I am doing this the way I have approached every arena I've competed in sports, business, entertainment:
Be open. Be honest. Be inquisitive. Be willing to learn how to win without losing your principles.
A New Path Forward
Today, I am launching The Bahamas Future Movement. Not a political party. A civic platform - nonpartisan and uncompromising.
One mission: forcing transparency where silence has taken hold.
We will:
1. Give Bahamians a voice loud enough to be heard
2. Hold every party accountable before votes are cast
3. Make transparency the price of seeking power
I am investing one million dollars of my own money to build this movement.
No donors and no strings; accountable only to the Bahamian people.
The Challenge
To every political party and leader:
Tell us where you stand on election integrity.
Tell us your plan for border preparedness.
Tell us what you know and what you don't.
Publicly - clearly and now.
The moment any party answers these questions in good faith, I will listen and I will engage. I will work together for the future of our country.
When I do choose, it will be where transparency has the best chance to lead.
Until then, I stand with the people demanding answers not with a system that hides behind silence.
Join Us
If you are ready to serve, to ask hard questions, and to help build a future rooted in trust join us.
Our leaders can break their silence, or citizens will build something strong enough that silence no longer works.
The Bahamas Future Movement Starts Now
https://www.bahamasfuturemovement.com
Friday, December 5, 2025
The Bahamas Attorney-General and Minister of Legal Affairs L. Ryan Pinder, KC on the Smuggling of Migrants Bill, 2025
The purpose of the Smuggling of Migrants Bill 2005 is not to change who is allowed to stay in The Bahamas. Its purpose is to give us sharper tools to go after the criminal smugglers who profit from exploiting desperate people and who add to the number of people in our country, The Bahamas - without a legal right to be here...
Wednesday, December 3, 2025
Growing Suspicion and National Doubt over The Bahamas Government Smuggling of Migrants Bill
Nassau, N.P., The Bahamas - Put that Smuggling of Migrants Bill on Hold!
HOLD THE BILL!!!
There are some questions emanating from the press release issued by the Government of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas in relation to the intention of the Government to debate and pass the "Smuggling of Migrants Bill".
In its own press statement the Government is quoted as saying, "The clause being circulated by Mr Bain deals with smuggled migrants as victims and witnesses of this crime. It simply prevents a victim from being charged under this new anti-smuggling law for acts that arise directly from being smuggled, such as illegal entry of possession of a fraudulent document supplied by the smuggler".
There are a number of questions that begs a clear and concise answer considering that someone being smuggled may not to be the same as a person being trafficked. According to The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR )"Human smuggling is when people called smugglers (sometimes referred to as "Coyotes"), help persons cross borders irregularly, typically with their consent, in return for money or other material benefit:
The UNHCR further defines Human Trafficking as the exploitation of people for profit such as forced labor or sexual exploitation".
So the Government needs to explain how can smuggled migrants qualify as victims and witnesses - as well as for short term humanitarian care, if by the UNHCR definition these individuals are typlically smuggled with "their"consent and usually by paying the smuggler money or by other material means?
So this begs the question, if the individuals being smuggled do not fall under the category as persons being kidnapped and trafficked to engage in forced labor and or for sexual exploitation, how do these individuals end up in a proposed Smuggling and Migrants bill in the Commonwealrh of The Bahamas as "Victims" and not "Criminals?
How will the Government determine from a boat or plane load of migrants who qualifies as smuggled persons (someone who paid to be brought to The Bahamas illegally) from trafficked persons (someone kidnapped and forced against their will)?
If the purpose of this bill is designed to put teeth into the law to punish smugglers, it cannot at the same time serve to exonrate those being smuggled as victims and witnesses, shielded from arrest and prosecution. The probability is that both smuggled migrants and smuggler are on the same vessel for the same purpose.
The general understanding with these kinds of smuggling operations is the individuals desiring to be smuggled to a destination illegally, "pay" a smuggler to smuggle them to said destination. This would mean that smuggled individuals are not victims, as nothing was done to them nor were they forced to make the journey. Second the smuggled migrant is indeed a witnesses but a witnesses to a crime and a crime that they are more than likely an accessory to.
There appears to be a section in the bill under the heading "Immunity from prosecution of smuggled migrants" - that says in part "A smuggled migrant cannot be liable to criminal prosecution under this Act in respects of
(A) illegal entry into the receiving country
(B) remaining illegally in the receiving country or transit country or
(C) possessing a fraudulent or identity document
It would be important for the Government to confirm if the above is true and what is their true intent when it comes to these smuggled migrants. There are many more questions. I was informed that it was the intent of the Government to debate and pass this bill today, Wednesday December 3rd 2025 or by tomorrow Thursday December 4th 2025.
I would strongly recommend Director of Communications Latrae Rahming encourage the Government to put the brakes on debating and passing this bill until there can be wide spread national consultation and input by the Bahamian people including members of the legal fraternity, the Church and Civil Society. I was just sent a copy of the bill and like many Bahamians, I have not had sufficient time to read it and I suspect neither have many other citizens.
Bills are comprised of serious legal language and the wrong language used in a bill could result in a wrong or devastating outcome. Bills tabled in the House of Assembly usually become the law of the land and so every bill should include the correct language, which should be very clear. However from the looks of things so far, this particular bill doesn't appear to be very clear and could open the door to suspicion and national doubtsuspicion and national doubt. Just my thoughts.
Kevin Harris
Wednesday December 3rd 2025
Nassau, N.P., The Bahamas: ABOUT THE SMUGGLING OF MIGRANTS BILL
Government of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas - STATEMENT ON FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT THE SMUGGLING OF MIGRANTS BILL
This is the first time that a Government of The Bahamas is putting a clear, stand alone crime of migrant smuggling into our law. At present, our Penal Code does not give prosecutors a direct charge for smuggling of migrants. They must piece together charges under the Penal Code and the Customs and Immigration Acts, which leaves much of the behaviour and methods used by smugglers outside the reach of the courts.
This Bill closes that gap and gives prosecutors and enforcement agencies a strong, modern legal tool to fight the smuggling of migrants and, with it, illegal immigration.
Against this background, the Government of The Bahamas rejects the false and reckless claims being made by Lincoln Bain about the Smuggling of Migrants Bill, 2025. His comments mislead Bahamians about what the Bill actually does and create unnecessary fear about the safety of our borders.
The Bill leaves the Immigration Act fully in place. Illegal landing, overstaying and related breaches of immigration law remain criminal offences. Immigration officers keep their full authority to detain, process and remove people who enter or remain in The Bahamas in breach of our laws.
The purpose of the Bill is to go after the criminal networks that organise and profit from moving people illegally across borders. Under section 5, a person who commits the offence of smuggling migrants is, on summary conviction, liable to a fine up to S100,000 or imprisonment up to seven years, or both.
On conviction on information, that person is liable to a fine up to $200,000 - imprisonment up to ten years, or both. Where the smuggling involves aggravated conduct such as endangering life, violence, exploitation, abuse or similar acts, section 5(5) increases the penalties.
In such aggravated cases, on summary conviction the court may impose a fine up to $250,000 or imprisonment up to seven years, or both. On conviction on information the court may impose a fine up to $300,000 or imprisonment up to fifteen years, or both.
In addition, where the offender owns the aircraft, vessel or vehicle used in the crime, that asset is liable to seizure and forfeiture and the court may impose a further fine up to three thousand dollars for each migrant smuggled.
The clause being circulated by Mr. Bain deals with smuggled migrants as victims and witnesses of this crime. It simply prevents a victim from being charged under this new anti-smuggling law for acts that arise directly from being smuggled, such as illegal entry or possession of a fraudulent document supplied by the smuggler.
Immigration authorities remain free to act under the Immigration Act, including detention and removal. There is no wording in the Bill that grants permanent residence, citizenship, or any fast-track to Bahamian status.
The Bill requires only basic, short-term humanitarian care for people in state custody, such as food, shelter and urgent medical attention. That standard reflects our Constitution, our Christian faith and our international obligations.
It does not create long-term welfare benefits and it does not interfere with removal procedures.
Irregular migration and border control demand serious, honest leadership. The Government of The Bahamas remains firmly committed to strong borders, tough penalties for smugglers and humane treatment of every person in our custody.
Bahamians can be confident that the Smuggling of Migrants Bill strengthens national security and gives our law enforcement officers stronger tools to break the smuggling networks that threaten our country.
December 2, 2025
Commonwealth of The Bahamas
Thursday, November 27, 2025
The Bahamas: From Majority Rule to a Minority Mentality
From Majority Rule to a Minority State of Mind
The Bahamas, a nation born from the triumph of Majority Rule, is now being quietly governed by minority participation. The very principle that defined our national identity—rule by the many—has weakened into a habit of rule by the few.
Nassau, N.P., The Bahamas
In the days following the Golden Isles by-election, Parliamentary Commissioner Harrison Thompson admitted officials were “baffled” by what they witnessed. More than 4,000 registered voters stayed home—four thousand Bahamian voices absent from the democratic table.
This isn’t normal. This isn’t healthy. And this certainly isn’t The Bahamas our parents and grandparents fought to build.
It is a warning.
The Bahamas, a nation born from the triumph of Majority Rule, is now being quietly governed by minority participation. The very principle that defined our national identity—rule by the many—has weakened into a habit of rule by the few.
We once fought to break away from minority governance. Now, by apathy, we are drifting right back into it.
The Grandfathers of the Nation
Honored, Respected, But Wrong About Today
Few leaders have shaped modern Bahamian democracy more than Prime Minister Philip “Brave” Davis—affectionately known as “Daddy”—and former Prime Minister Hubert Alexander Ingraham, the nation’s “Papa.” They governed in a time when Bahamians turned out in large numbers, when the civic spirit was alive, when Majority Rule felt like an inheritance that could never be lost.
Their leadership deserves respect. But respectfully, they are applying yesterday’s confidence to today’s crisis.
Papa Ingraham recently said, “You can’t steal an election in The Bahamas.” Daddy Davis has projected similar assurance, confident that all is steady; that all is well.
But the numbers tell a different story.
With 4,000 voters staying home and only 25% of the electorate determining a parliamentary seat, it is clear that everything is not fine. Elections today are not being stolen by corruption, they are being stolen by apathy.
The people are not being silenced. The people are silencing themselves. That is a threat unlike anything our national fathers ever had to confront.
The 25% Problem and The Quiet Collapse of Majority Rule
In Golden Isles, a candidate did not need half the votes to win. They only needed a quarter.
Imagine four people sitting at a table, and only one person deciding whether the other three get to eat. That is not democracy. That is Minority Rule by default, disguised in the shell of a Majority Rule system.
Apathy made the decision. Apathy filled the seat. Apathy now shapes our future more than the electorate does.
If nothing changes, apathy will steal the 2026 General Election—boldly, openly, and without resistance.
The Biblical Consequence of Not Showing Up
Exodus 20:12 instructs us: “Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be long in the land the Lord your God gives you.”
This is more than a household command. It is a national one.
Our mothers and fathers, the generation who delivered Majority Rule paid a price so that the many could decide. But when thousands stay home and a minority chooses for the majority, we dishonor that sacrifice. We weaken the foundation they built. We shorten the lifespan of the society they secured. Not by curse, but by consequence.
No nation survives when its people stop showing up for it.
The Bahamas Calls Itself a Christian Nation. But Where Is Our Discipline?
Every Bahamian child knows this line: “Get ready—you're going to church.” Church was not optional. It was discipline, Duty and Expectation. That same discipline is now needed in our democracy.
Voting must become cultural again. Voting must become expected. Voting must become a mandate of service, rooted in the same values that shaped us in church.
A democracy cannot stand on 25%, and a nation cannot survive on silence.
A Call to the Pastors of the Nation
When nations face danger, their spiritual leaders must speak, not to endorse parties, but to awaken responsibility. Isaiah 58:1 says: “Cry aloud, spare not.”
This is such a moment. Pastors must call on Daddy, Papa, and all political leaders to stand together, not in competition, but in unity before an election date is set, and address this crisis at its root.
This is not politics. This is stewardship.
The Path Forward: Restore Majority Rule in Practice, Not Just in Memory
If we want the Bahamas to remain a nation governed by the many, not the few, we must modernize and reinforce our democratic practices.
1. Stream the Vote
Let every Bahamian watch the process in real time. Transparency builds trust. Trust builds turnout. Turnout restores Majority Rule.
2. National Civic Duty Day
A once-every-five-year paid holiday for voting. A day dedicated to civic responsibility, just as Sundays were dedicated to church. A day that transforms voting from an inconvenience into an expectation.
Make voting a habit. Make voting a duty. Make voting Bahamian.
The Grandchildren Must Grow Up, and show Up
Here is the truth: We are the grandchildren of Majority Rule. We didn’t march for it. We didn’t fight for it. But we inherited it.
And now it is slipping, not because someone took it, but because we have stopped showing up to protect it.
If we want a Bahamas worthy of the next generation, and if we want a future we can proudly claim there is only one path forward:
We must grow up. We must stand up. We must show up now.
Our vote is not merely a right - it is our inheritance. It is the last piece of power placed directly into our hands by the generation that fought before us.
Every time we stay home, we hand that inheritance away.
Our grandparents carried this country. Daddy and Papa fought their battles. Now it’s our turn.
No more waiting. No more watching. No more wishing someone older would fix what is now ours to repair.
Grow up, stand up, and show up. This is our generation’s responsibility - our generation’s Majority Rule moment.
Final Call:
Reject the Minority Mindset and restore the Bahamian Majority.
Apathy is winning. Apathy is shrinking our democracy. Apathy is reversing what our ancestors built.
But we can stop this. We have the duty, we have the power, and we have the moment - for our fathers, mothers, children; and for the future of The Bahamas.
The Bahamas will belong to all Bahamians, but only if all Bahamians show up.
Wednesday, November 26, 2025
U.S.A. Lifts Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti
Allowing Haitian nationals to remain temporarily in the United States is inconsistent with U.S. national interest
The Department of Homeland Security today posted a Federal Register notice on the termination of Temporary Protected Status for Haiti. After consulting with interagency partners, Secretary Noem concluded that Haiti no longer meets the statutory requirements for TPS. This decision was based on a review conducted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, input from relevant U.S. government agencies, and an analysis indicating that allowing Haitian nationals to remain temporarily in the United States is inconsistent with U.S. national interests.
The termination of the Haiti Temporary Protected Status designation is effective February 3, 2026. If you are an alien who is currently a beneficiary of TPS for Haiti, you should prepare to depart if you have no other lawful basis for remaining in the United States. You can use the CBP Home mobile application to report your departure from the United States. This secure and convenient self-deportation process includes a complimentary plane ticket, a $1,000 exit bonus, and potential future opportunities for legal immigration to the United States.
Find more information about TPS at uscis.gov/tps. For more information on USCIS and its programs, please visit uscis.gov or follow us on X(formerlyTwitter, Instagram , YouTube, Facebook and LinkedIn






