Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Election Court Bahamas: Court hears that three protest voters did not live in Elizabeth

By Krystel Rolle ~ Guardian Staff Reporter ~ krystel@nasguard.com:



The names of three of the five people who voted on protest ballots in favor of Progressive Liberal Party candidate Ryan Pinder on February 16 are not on the Elizabeth register, according to evidence given by Parliamentary Commissioner Errol Bethel yesterday.

Bethel told the Election Court that voters A, D, and F — as they are referred to in court to protect their identities — were registered in neighboring constituencies.

Voters D and F are registered in Yamacraw, while voter A is registered in Fox Hill, according to Bethel, who took the stand for the second day yesterday.

Pinder wants the court to rule that the five protest votes cast in his favor are valid. If at least three of those votes are approved, he would be declared the winner of the election.

During cross-examination by attorney Milton Evans, who represents Free National Movement candidate Dr. Duane Sands, Bethel said the voters were placed on the various registers because of the information provided by them about their addresses.

He said it was not a mistake that they were registered in those constituencies. Rather, Bethel said it was a conscious decision.

He added that before the 2007 boundary change, voter A was in the Elizabeth constituency. However, Bethel said when the boundaries were cut during the run-up to the general election, the voter was transferred to the Fox Hill constituency.

He estimated that the boundary change affected tens of thousands of people.

The parliamentary commissioner also said he would not be surprised if there were other voters holding voter's cards for the wrong constituency.

Senior Justices Anita Allen and Jon Isaacs, who are presiding over the case, asked whether the parliamentary commissioner attempted to clean up the register since the last general election.

Allen noted that more than two years have passed since the general election and wondered whether the parliamentary commissioner would have an obligation to fix the register.

However, Bethel said changes are only made when voters initiate the process. He said when voters move, it is their obligation to notify the Parliamentary Registration Department.

After Bethel left the stand, voters E, C, and F testified briefly.

When questioned by Pinder's lead counsel Philip Brave Davis, voters E and C told the court that the affidavits that they signed were true and correct.

Voter F told the court that she cast her vote for the PLP candidate in the 2007 general election at the Thelma Gibson Primary School. However, she could not recall which constituency she voted in.

She noted that her current voter's card places her in the Yamacraw constituency but she said she moved from Yamacraw Shores in 2006 to Pine Barren Road. She admitted, however, that she never notified the Parliamentary Registration Department about the move and therefore was never transferred to another constituency.

The voter, who did not have her voter's card yesterday, is expected to return today to continue her testimony.

Voter A's husband also testified yesterday.

He told the court that he and his wife have lived on South Barren Road in the Elizabeth constituency since 2006.

He said when his wife received her voter's card in April 2007, she noticed that she was registered in the Fox Hill constituency. The man said when she realized that, she went to the Parliamentary Registration Department to have it changed to Elizabeth. Voter A's husband said his wife eventually got the card corrected and subsequently voted in Elizabeth during the 2007 general election.

Under cross-examination, voter A's husband said he and his wife often visit his mother's house, which is in the Yamacraw constituency. He said sometimes they stay there for as long as a month. He said his mother is a cancer patient and they go there to help her out. He denied that he rents an apartment in the Yamacraw constituency.

Voter's A adopted father also offered similar testimony. He said voter A lives with him and about 45 other people in the Elizabeth constituency. He explained that they run a charity that assists the homeless.

He said both he and voter A met Pinder and Sands while they were campaigning in the days before the by-election.

Returning Officer Jack Thompson also took the stand briefly yesterday.

He confirmed that there were six protest votes — five for Pinder and one for Bahamas Democratic Movement candidate Cassius Stuart.

The Elizabeth by-election ended with Sands receiving 1,501 regular votes and Pinder receiving 1,499 regular votes.

Pinder is exercising his right under Section 69 (1) of the Parliamentary Elections Act, which allows a candidate to petition the court to consider the protest votes cast if the margin of victory of his opponent (in this case Sands) is less than the number of his (Pinder's) protest votes.


Tuesday March 16, 2010

thenassauguardian