The essential differences between Messrs Hubert Ingraham and Perry Christie revealed

We Have No Choice?
by Simon


The House of Assembly debated a resolution on the Baha Mar deal recently. Unfortunately for the Perry Christie-led PLP, it has already lost the broader national debate on the proposed mega project.

This includes a haemorrhaging of goodwill from the PLP by many professionals and even many within the party who are flabbergasted and frustrated by Mr. Christie’s dissembling and series of incoherent statements on Baha Mar since its inception. Curiously, part of the story concerns – the BlackBerry.

Some weeks ago, Mr. Christie attempted to mock the Prime Minister for regularly checking his BlackBerry at a dinner attended by both leaders. Mr. Ingraham was monitoring any news of a settlement between Baha Mar and Scotiabank on an outstanding loan between the two entities.

The story reveals the essential differences between Messrs. Ingraham and Christie. Hubert Ingraham is a part of the Smartphone generation while his former law partner is a throwback to a bygone era, wedded to a model of economic development that is being assigned to the proverbial ash heap of history.

Mr. Ingraham’s use of the BlackBerry represents a forward-looking, tech-savvy style of leadership marked by a hands-on approach, timeliness and engagement. This is in marked contrast to Mr. Christie’s cavalier, late-again and disengaged style. The device that perhaps best represents his decision-making style is the telegraph, which in today’s world would be slow-moving, clunky and out-of-date.

But, the more defining difference between the men was revealed in one of the more shocking statements ever made by a Bahamian leader on a project as large and as involved as Baha Mar.

WE HAVE NO CHOICE?

On the eve of Mr. Ingraham’s departure for China, the Leader of the Opposition counselled the Prime Minister to take the Baha Mar deal as it was. His reckless advice: We have no choice! We have no choice?

One would have expected this to be the view of officials at Baha Mar, not of a former Prime Minister. Life is filled with choices, even in the most difficult circumstances.

It is clear that Mr. Christie would have headed to China on bended knee, as an agent for Baha Mar, representing narrow special interests rather than the broader Bahamian national interest.

Mr. Christie’s view that the country had no choice but to accept the Baha Mar deal as is, is the clearest insight yet into why he essentially gave away Bahamian treasure and land at Cable Beach which no Bahamian leader from the UBP, PLP or FNM ever did.

It explains the Great Mayaguana Land Give-Away in which beachfront property equivalent of the distance from the eastern end of New Providence to Lyford Cay was alienated to foreign interests.

It reveals why his party’s land policy has been disastrous for The Bahamas and why his talk of Bahamianization is mostly talk. It further demonstrates why Mr. Christie and the PLP are content to sell cheaply our national ambitions and dreams to foreign interests, often to the cheapest bidder, rather than genuinely empower Bahamians.

Thankfully, Mr. Ingraham disregarded Mr. Christie’s monstrously bad advice in his negotiations with the Chinese. He did so because he knows that The Bahamas indeed has a choice, indeed a number of choices, as we slowly recover from a global economic crisis.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Rather than bended-knee, Mr. Ingraham went head-to-head with Chinese officials. Whereas Mr. Christie felt there was no choice than to accept $200 million dollars worth of contracts for Bahamians, Mr. Ingraham got that number doubled to $400 million. Those contracts will now include work on the Core Project which was not in the original deal.

In his Sunday press conference Mr. Ingraham noted that contracts will be awarded to large, medium, small scale and individual contractors. This is broad economic empowerment in fact, rather than just in talk.

Mr. Ingraham insisted on and got a sizable expansion of training opportunities for Bahamian workers and professionals. This dovetails with his administration’s revamping of the Bahamas Technical and Vocational Institute under revised legislation passed this year. It may also build on the National Retraining initiative launched last year.

The Prime Minister also suggested that there may have been some movement on phasing in the number of rooms at Baha Mar over a designated period of time.

Whatever the final outcome on this matter, it is clear that Mr. Ingraham went to China to negotiate a better deal for the country, as opposed to Mr. Christie who it appears may have gone simply for a signing ceremony and pomp in circumstances that would not have been as advantageous to The Bahamas.

WATERSHED

As noted previously in this column, the Baha Mar deal has been a watershed in terms of the vision and quality of governance demonstrated by Mr. Ingraham and the FNM in stark contrast to that of Mr. Christie and the PLP.

It must be a source of considerable angst for the latter, that the project they initiated has been re-negotiated on better terms and will be launched by an Ingraham-led FNM Government. History eclipses those who are irresolute, procrastinating and dithering when decisiveness is required.

The Bahamas deserves better than political, business or civic leaders telling us that we have no choice in charting our national destiny, despite the rough seas we are facing. This is the talk of those who are dragged along hopelessly by the stream events, rather than tacking and turning to navigate those events to one’s better advantage.

On Baha Mar and other foreign investment projects, Mr. Christie has shown that he is mastered and sidelined by events. Through painstaking negotiations Mr. Ingraham has shown that he knows how to shape events, even when presented with as problematic a deal as the initial one placed on the table by Baha Mar.

Mr. Christie’s declaration that the country had no choice on Baha Mar proved stunningly incorrect. It will prove to be one of the more disastrous pronouncements he has made in his long political career. It is a mistake the Bahamian people will clearly take into account as they make their choice at the next general election.

bahamapundit

Bahamas Blog International