Showing posts with label Haitian elites. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Haitian elites. Show all posts

Saturday, January 6, 2024

The Haiti Mission Should Not Deploy In Force Until It Has Sufficient Troops, Training and Equipment to Overpower The Haitian Gangs

Foreign forces will encounter major operational hurdles as they seek to weaken the hold of Haitians gangs on Haiti


Crisis in Haiti


Haiti’s Gangs: Can a Foreign Mission Break Their Stranglehold?



Port-au-Prince/New York/Washington/Brussels, 5 January 2024

From Crisis Group



What’s new?  Foreign security personnel are expected to begin arriving in Haiti in early 2024 to assist the national police in fighting the gangs besieging much of the country.  UN-authorised, Kenyan-led and designed with U.S. support, this multinational mission aims to restore security and enable long overdue elections.

Why does it matter?  Haiti’s wave of violence and political breakdown have deepened the country’s humanitarian emergency.  With police outnumbered and outgunned by criminal groups, foreign assistance is needed.  But the mission must overcome daunting operational and political challenges for it to be effective.

What should be done?  The mission should not deploy in force until it has sufficient troops, training and equipment to overpower the gangs.  It should prepare for urban combat, and develop community-level sources of intelligence, to help minimise civilian harm.  A political settlement and major reforms will be required for gains to endure.

I. Overview

Answering a plea for assistance from the Haitian government, the UN Security Council has authorised a multinational force to help it break criminal gangs’ grip on much of the country.  Despite the chequered legacy of past interventions, most Haitians believe only foreign forces can bring respite from the violence that has upended their lives.

The proposed mission may encounter several obstacles, however.  While Kenya has volunteered troops, judicial proceedings could hold up deployment.

The mission will also face big operational challenges, such as shifting gang allegiances that create the possibility of a united front against it; the difficulties of protecting civilians in urban warfare; and corruption among police and politicians linked to criminal groups.

A small team of Kenyans arriving in early 2024 can help commanders understand the terrain and ensure they do not deploy before they are set up to prevail.  In the long term, a political settlement and a robust demobilisation program, as well as plans for staunching weapons flows and severing ties between criminals and Haitian elites, are needed to sustain progress.

Already besieged by gangs, which had been tightening their control of areas throughout the country for years, Haiti suffered a further blow with the assassination of President Jovenel Moïse in 2021.  More than 200,000 Haitians are now displaced, as gangs seize neighbourhoods, thoroughfares and fuel depots – choking off supplies of food and other essentials to people in need.

As it endures the humanitarian and security crisis the gangs have engendered, the country is also in political limbo.  There have been no elections since 2016, and the acting prime minister, Ariel Henry, who was appointed to his post and is seen as illegitimate by much of the political opposition, has shown reluctance to share power.  He has committed to step down in February after elections that were supposed to have taken place in 2023, but it remains to be seen whether he will stick to his pledge since there were no polls.

Against this backdrop, the opposition worries that the arrival of an international force to help restore security and address Haiti’s humanitarian crisis – which Henry requested in 2022 and the UN Security Council authorised in October 2023 – could help the current government cling to power.

Ideally, as Crisis Group has previously recommended, the country’s political forces would come together in welcoming the mission.  But today’s dynamics suggest that the bigger risk to the country’s long-suffering citizenry would be to delay the deployment yet further.

So long as legal, operational and other requirements can be met, it is safer for Haitians menaced by gang rule to move forward under sub-optimal political conditions.

The new mission … will seek to protect state institutions … critical infrastructure … transport hubs, and … launch a counter-offensive against gangs.

Still, those requirements are no small hurdle to clear.  Even getting to this point has been challenging.  Approved by the UN Security Council almost a year after Henry’s government first made its request, the international mission began forming only after Kenya volunteered to lead it with a contribution of 1,000 police officers.

The difficulty in identifying a lead country and other troop contributors, despite U.S. entreaties, underscores just how wary governments are of becoming involved in Haiti, where foreign interventions (including the last UN peacekeeping mission to the country, which left in 2017) have left a sometimes tragic legacy.

As envisioned, the new mission, which will be organised as an ad hoc coalition rather than a blue-helmeted UN operation, will seek to protect state institutions as well as critical infrastructure and transport hubs, and together with the Haitian police, launch a counter-offensive against gangs.  It appears that an advance contingent of several hundred officers will deploy ahead of the rest of the force.  It should arrive in Haiti in early 2024.

Major challenges lie in wait for the mission once it is on the ground.  Haiti’s gangs could ally to battle it together.

Fighting in Haiti’s ramshackle urban neighbourhoods will put innocent civilians at risk.

Links between corrupt police and the gangs could make it difficult to maintain operational secrecy.

For all these reasons, preparation will be of critical importance.  Discussions are now under way between Kenyan and Haitian security forces about the mission’s goals and rules of engagement.

The projected advance contingent should continue work already begun by assessment missions that have visited from Nairobi.  It should map the zones of gang control, assess the threat they pose and measure operational risks, with the aim of ensuring that when the full mission deploys it can make a convincing show of force that does not provoke the gangs or spark violent retaliation.

Local experts emphasised to Crisis Group that a strong early showing in this spirit could help persuade the gangs to move to a non-confrontational posture.

Other key tasks for the mission will be to absorb expertise on civilian protection in urban settings, develop intelligence networks in the communities where it will be operating, train vetted police units with whom it can cooperate and begin devising a demobilisation program so that gang members who wish to leave their criminal outfits have a pathway out.

Of utmost importance will be scrupulous attention to the safeguards built into the UN mandate to prevent the misdeeds of MINUSTAH, the last UN peacekeeping mission, which became notorious for spreading cholera throughout the country as well as engaging in sexual exploitation of local women.

Finally, both the mission and its supporters will need to turn their attention to structural issues if there is to be hope of an end to Haiti’s overlapping crises.  A political settlement is at the top of the list.

At present, to the population’s outrage, Haitian politicians are squabbling over formation of a transitional government as gangs continue their campaign of violence.  Multiple rounds of negotiation between Henry and the opposition have failed to produce a stable and authentically cross-party pact.  After Haiti’s international partners upped pressure on Henry to make additional concessions in the quest for a power-sharing agreement, opposition groups fastened on what they saw as a sign of weakness: they are now calling upon him to make good on his promise to resign by February.

Outside actors with influence will need to continue pushing the two sides to agree on the shape of a transitional government that can begin a process of institutional renewal and prepare the country for the first elections in years.

The multinational mission’s deployment in Haiti could bring essential relief to a country mired in strife.  But bumps in the road ahead pose a major threat to the force’s effectiveness.

After decades of international interventions and billions in aid, Haiti fatigue in foreign capitals is real.  But rarely has the country needed help more than now.  For the sake of Haiti’s long-suffering people, every effort must go into helping the mission succeed.

II. A Fraught Security and Political Landscape

Haiti has suffered gang violence for years, but the power of these groups has soared since the assassination of President Moïse and appointment of acting Prime Minister Henry.

There are currently some 300 gangs in Haiti, controlling most of the Port-au-Prince metropolitan area and key parts of the Artibonite valley, the area north of the capital where much of the country’s food is grown.

A. A Surge in Violence amid a Breakdown in Authority

Violence perpetrated by gangs – including murder, rape, kidnapping and extortion – has spread across much of the country in recent years, becoming far more intense.  The UN reported almost 4,000 people killed and 3,000 kidnapped in gang-related violence in 2023 alone.  Sexual violence was also widespread, with over 1,100 reported attacks on women as of October.  As part of ten massacres perpetrated by gangs in greater Port-au-Prince since 2018, at least 179 women and girls were raped.

There are roughly 200,000 internally displaced persons in Haiti – largely comprising people who have left their homes in the face of gang attacks – including 40,000 who had to flee violence between August and October 2023.  Many have sought refuge at makeshift sites in public squares or schools, in the latter case taking a large number of classrooms out of use for education.

The gangs also impose their own taxes on businesses from informal street vendors to industrial parks in areas they control.  The result is shortages of essential goods and rising food prices in a country where almost half the population does not have enough to eat.

Kidnapping for ransom, affecting rich and poor alike, has forced thousands of families to sacrifice their savings or fall into debt to secure the release of their loved ones.

Gangs have run rampant because the state has largely crumbled.

As discussed further below, Henry has little public support, and it is widely held that only backing from Haiti’s foreign partners keeps him in power.  There has been no election of any sort since 2016, and parliament has not held a session since January 2020, when the terms of all the deputies in the lower house and almost all the senators expired.

The country’s remaining elected officials – a rump bloc of ten senators – saw their terms run out in January 2023.  At the same time, the judicial system is beset by long strikes by staff and extreme insecurity, which has forced officials to abandon several courthouses in the capital that have fallen into gangs’ hands.

The state’s provision of basic services is likewise exiguous, with huge shortfalls in potable water, electricity and waste collection.  Rivers of garbage traverse many areas of Port-au-Prince, producing illness and misery.

The Haitian National Police are weak, too, unable to staunch gang violence despite support from the UN political mission in Haiti.

The Haitian National Police are weak, too, unable to staunch gang violence despite support from the UN political mission in Haiti, known as BINUH, and countries such as Canada, the U.S. and France.  The force has fewer than 10,000 active officers to cover the national territory.  (According to the UN-recommended ratio, more than 25,000 officers would be warranted.)

In the past year alone, more than 1,000 officers stepped down.  Problems with discipline and insubordination in the police force could jeopardise the foreign mission’s operations.

The seemingly minor issue of uniforms is one example.  Many officers patrolling the streets sport balaclavas, despite a ban on wearing any accessory altering the official uniform except when conducting special operations.

Because gang members often don balaclavas, people are often confused about who is a real police officer.  To make matters worse, gang members sometimes wear old police uniforms, which were probably handed down by officers with gang connections.

The gangs have profited from not only the breakdown in public authority but also entrenchment in Haitian society.  These groups have historically enjoyed close links with Haitian politicians and wealthy businesspeople, who have long used them as private armies.

Although the gangs have gained a degree of independence in recent years by expanding their own sources of income, insiders say ties between government officials, business leaders and the gangs are still strong.  “Gangs are not only to be found in the lower part of the city”, said a former official, pointing to patrons at a well-known bar in an upscale neighbourhood of Port-au-Prince. 

“People who collaborate with them hang out right here.  They are the ones who live between legality and illegality, who make contacts with the banks, who help bring in weapons”.

With a view to severing these links, in 2022 the U.S. and Canada began imposing sanctions on leading politicians and businesspeople accused of directly or indirectly supporting Haitian gangs, including former President Michel Martelly and two former prime ministers.

It is difficult to ascertain with full confidence that the sanctions have weakened the ties, but observers noted a rise in kidnappings after they were issued, which suggests that gangs resorted to new methods of obtaining money to make up for losing funds from wealthy sponsors.

The UN Security Council also established a sanctions regime for Haiti in 2022.  But more than a year after it was set up, and despite detailed reporting by a panel of experts, the Council has struggled to agree on which businesspeople or politicians to add to the sanctions list, which features only five notorious gang leaders at present.

In the meantime, gangs have extended their territorial sway.  One by one, the gateways to the capital have fallen under the control of different armed gangs, which have been collecting illegal tolls on all the main roads linking Port-au-Prince to the rest of the country.  It is in these circumstances that the Security Council took the further step in October 2023 of authorising a multilateral force to help address the humanitarian and security crisis in Haiti.

B. Two Gang Coalitions and a Vigilante Movement

1. Two coalitions

Since the mid-2020s, most gangs in the capital have grouped themselves into two rival coalitions, known as the G9 and the Gpèp.  The Gpèp – an alliance first led by alias Ti Gabriel but now without a clear chain of command – appears to be drawing most of its resources from activities such as kidnapping and drug trafficking. 

Meanwhile, Jimmy “Barbecue” Chérizier, a G9 leader, pursues dominance on the streets through extortion and violence, while professing quasi-political motivations; however implausibly, he has said his group refrains from kidnapping or harming civilians.  He and his allies refuse to profit from the poor, he insists, and in fact defend the vulnerable.

The coalitions’ fight for supremacy has resulted in thousands of deaths of both gang members and civilians, with the latter increasingly falling victim to indiscriminate attacks by the criminal bands.  The gangs have a wide range of weaponry, from homemade firearms to high-powered rifles, at their disposal.

The second half of 2023 has seen an increase in violence, with gangs … ramping up attacks on each other.

The second half of 2023 has seen an increase in violence, with gangs belonging to the G9 and the Gpèp coalitions ramping up attacks on each other, seemingly in a bid to gain territory before the multinational mission arrives.  Some of the most brutal fighting followed the accidental death in mid-November of Iscard Andrice (known as Iskar), a founder and influential leader of the G9 coalition.

Iskar had been chief enforcer of a siege on the Brooklyn neighbourhood in Port-au-Prince since 2020, controlled by Gpèp’s boss, alias Ti Gabriel.  The day after Iskar’s death, Ti Gabriel launched attacks in the areas previously under his rival’s control, with support from at least two Gpèp-affiliated gangs.

Over the course of three days, the clashes killed at least 166 people and displaced more than 1,000.  An orphanage and a hospital were caught in the crossfire.

While internal fractures threaten the G9 coalition, the Gpèp has continued to expand its footprint.  Alias Black Alex Mana, who took Iskar’s place as a leader of the G9, was killed just a week after his boss died by a mid-level commander of his own gang.

Gpèp gangs have also launched ruthless offensives in and around the capital and are consolidating alliances with armed groups in the Artibonite valley, where approximately 1,700 people have been killed, injured or kidnapped in under two years.

Even as they vie for power and territory, the gangs have shown that they are aware of the multilateral force’s pending arrival, seemingly exploring postures that might help manage the risk of confrontation.

In August, after Kenya offered to lead the mission, Chérizier hinted at the possibility of a truce.  A month later, in September, G9 and Gpèp leaders declared through voice notes on social media that they were willing to reduce violence under an initiative they called Viv Ansanm, a phrase that means “living together” in Haitian Creole.

But they also suggested another option, with Chérizier indicating that gangs could eventually ally with the goal of confronting international forces from a position of greater strength. He declared that the gangs would welcome a foreign force if it came to help restore security in the country, but that “if they come to the community ghettos and start shooting and massacring, we Haitians will rise up and fight them to the last drop of blood”.

2. The Bwa Kale movement

Beyond the gangs, the security landscape includes vigilante groups that have sprung up across the capital as a form of citizen self-protection.  Building on a long history of self-defence brigades, today’s incarnation, the Bwa Kale movement, emerged in April 2023.

Armed with all manner of weaponry, including high-calibre guns, the vigilantes have built barricades to deter gangs from entering their neighbourhoods.  They have also attacked young men accused of belonging to criminal groups – lynching some 350 in just over three months.

The pushback had some success: many gangs had to withdraw to areas they fully controlled and halt their attacks on civilians for the first time in recent years.

But Bwa Kale’s dark side was also evident.  Although many Haitians celebrated the movement’s rise, some government officials and international partners voiced concern that it could spark more conflict, decrying its brutal methods, including the extrajudicial killings.

Although Bwa Kale’s offensive lasted only a few months and gangs have resumed encroaching upon new territory, certain brigades remain active.  They continue to block numerous roads in Port-au-Prince with their improvised barricades, mostly after sunset.

Experts worry that the multilateral mission’s arrival could revitalise the vigilante groups, with uncertain effect.  It could trigger attacks by them on individuals suspected of being gang members.

But it could also foster alliances between these groups and specific gangs, building on partnerships that emerged earlier when vigilantes helped certain gangs fend off rivals.

C. Political Stalemate

Haiti’s security crisis is made worse by its political situation.  Having assumed power outside the normal electoral process in the wake of President Moïse’s assassination, acting Prime Minister Henry lacks the mandate needed to take on the country’s multidimensional challenges.

Since taking office, Henry has faced staunch opposition from many political parties and civil society groups.  The opposition believes that Henry’s unelected government holds on to power thanks solely to unflinching foreign support, despite what many perceive to be his dismal performance during two-plus years in power and the fact that Canada has sanctioned two of his former cabinet ministers for supporting gang activities.

Some foreign capitals, in fact, hesitated to join the multinational mission precisely because of the deep political fractures in Haiti.

Efforts to foster a political agreement between Henry and opposition forces have made little progress.  The parties have clashed over how to restore a balanced system of executive rule (the constitution provides for a prime minister to work alongside a president), with the opposition demanding more controls upon what they perceive as the unfettered powers afforded Henry.

Unfortunately, the last six months of multi-party negotiations have tended to exacerbate antagonism among political forces instead of bringing them closer to agreement.

As part of the negotiations facilitated by a delegation from the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) in Kingston, Jamaica, the main political groups opposed to Henry, including the so-called Montana Agreement and the parties PHTK (ie, Parti Haïtien Tèt Kale) and Fanmi Lavalas, signed a declaration in June calling for creation of a presidential council that would work alongside a prime minister during a transitional period until elections can be held.

But Henry baulked, saying he was willing only to add new members to the existing High Transitional Council, a body created under an agreement reached on 21 December 2022 among various parties.  This half-concession did nothing to ease tensions.

By September 2023, faced with Henry’s stubborn refusal to agree to greater power sharing, and following an alarming upsurge in gang violence, some of the most prominent groups that had signed the joint declaration started hardening their positions.

The Montana Agreement called for Henry’s immediate resignation and accused the government of involvement in crimes against humanity because of its alleged gang ties.

Soon afterward, most of the remaining signatories of the Kingston declaration joined forces with other opposition groups to establish a new alliance.

As discussions about deploying a mission gained momentum in New York, the group presented to both domestic and international audiences a plan that points to the creation of a transitional government, which would fill the void left by Henry, presuming he steps down in February as promised in the “21 December agreement”.

In response, the U.S. and other foreign powers with sway over Haiti’s political players pressed Henry to make additional concessions, including granting further powers to the Transitional Council.

CARICOM’s facilitation team returned to Haiti twice between November and December, hoping that Henry’s willingness to consider widening the Council’s membership and vesting it with certain presidential powers would break the deadlock in negotiations.  But the facilitators continued to face steadfast calls for Henry’s resignation from opposition groups.

With little hope that the sparring groups will conclude a comprehensive agreement soon, it looks increasingly likely that the international mission will confront deep divisions among the country’s main political forces when it arrives in Haiti.

Crisis Group has recommended in the past that the government and opposition should reach an accord before troops deploy so that the mission does not get entangled in the political fray.  That risk still exists, and foreign partners should continue to press all sides to reach a deal on establishing a unity government.

But in the meantime, the need for an urgent response to extreme violence on the ground, as well as efforts by foreign partners to bring government and opposition together, suggest that political disunity is now a lesser danger than inaction.

III. Putting the Mission into Practice

It is into this disheartening security and political setting that the Multinational Security Support mission (MSS) – which the UN Security Council authorised in October 2023 under its Chapter VII powers – will arrive to back up the Haitian police in fighting the gangs.

Kenya will lead the MSS and provide 1,000 police officers as part of an ad hoc coalition of military police and civilians expected to be deployed from around a dozen countries; the mission will receive financial support from voluntary donations managed through a UN trust fund.

Nairobi’s commitment to lead the force, announced in July 2023, ended the nearly year-long search for a country to take on this challenge.  For its part, Kenya saw volunteering to lead as an opportunity both to demonstrate solidarity with the African diaspora and to expand security cooperation with the U.S.

Although the Security Council’s stamp of approval on the mission was regarded as critical by Kenya and other supporters of the initiative, the MSS will not be UN-led. Nor will it be funded through assessed contributions, and there remains much to do to prepare the ground for the mission’s deployment.

The clock is ticking: the mission’s one-year mandate started running on 2 October, when the resolution backing its creation was passed.  While renewal is of course possible, that conversation in the Security Council will be easier if the mission has a track record of achievements or reason to believe they are forthcoming.

The clock is ticking: the mission’s one-year mandate started running on 2 October.

The Council provided the mission with a clearly defined but ambitious framework for its first twelve months of operations.  With the overall objective of supporting the police’s efforts to restore security and create conditions conducive to holding elections, the mission is empowered both to help plan and conduct operations jointly with the police against Haiti’s gangs and to assist in protecting critical infrastructure and transport hubs.

The Council also requested that the mission help the Haitian police safeguard deliveries of humanitarian aid and support them and other UN entities in combatting illicit arms trafficking.

Crucially, the Council affords the mission exceptional but temporary authority to arrest and detain individuals (in cooperation with Haitian police) in order to maintain public safety.

This multi-pronged mandate emerged as a compromise among the U.S., Kenya and Haiti.

At first, the U.S. had envisioned a multinational force with a light footprint and low visibility that would essentially protect state institutions and critical infrastructure.  But after Kenya conducted an assessment visit in August 2023, it concluded that it would need offensive capabilities to not only protect critical infrastructure but also to meet the Haitian population’s expectations.

The mandate accommodates these two views and closely aligns with what Haitians expect an international mission to accomplish.

Diplomats are quick to champion the Council’s approval of the mission as a gesture of international solidarity with Haiti, and the MSS stricture as an emerging model for multilateral security cooperation.

Few dispute the Secretary-General’s claim in August that UN peacekeeping would be ill suited to provide the robust intervention that Haiti needs to loosen the grip of armed gangs.

Amid uncertainty about the future of UN peacekeeping globally, the ad hoc model of international cooperation put forward for Haiti will be watched closely.  The attention only raises the stakes as the mission and its supporters work through myriad political and operational dilemmas before the force can be deployed in earnest.

Kenyan representatives have conducted multiple visits to Haiti to prepare the security forces, while contending with domestic legal challenges to their deployment.

Though the Kenyan parliament approved the mission in mid-November, it has been challenged in the courts by an opposition party on the grounds that the constitution does not allow the government to deploy police abroad.  The Supreme Court will rule on this suit in late January.

The most recent assessments by Kenya indicate that the mission should have up to 5,000 personnel and cost approximately $240 million per year.

It remains unclear for now how quickly the mission can secure enough troops and funding to fulfil the entirety of its mandate.  The most recent assessments by Kenya indicate that the mission should have up to 5,000 personnel and cost approximately $240 million per year, though a Security Council diplomat suggested to Crisis Group that these figures may be inflated.

For its part, Nairobi tentatively plans to deploy a few hundred military police in early 2024 (provided the Supreme Court dismisses the pending legal case), but it is unclear when the rest of the Kenyan contingent might follow.

Over the past few months, many countries have informally suggested they would also be willing to deploy personnel or contribute funding.

So far, the bulk of financial support for the force, as well as most of the logistical and operational planning, has been provided by the U.S.

Washington plans to allocate $100 million in funding to the MSS, and $100 million more of what the State Department has described as “in-kind support – intelligence, airlift, communications and medical”.

Nairobi has announced that eleven countries will send officers to the MSS, while other countries have offered to provide officers, equipment or funding.

But not all of those offers are confirmed, and diplomats have suggested to Crisis Group that the search for countries willing to contribute military police is progressing more slowly than hoped.

Furthermore, the UN-managed trust fund has not received all the expected contributions, an issue of some importance given the Kenyan interior minister’s assertion that Nairobi will deploy its forces only when all required funding for the mission has been committed and made available.

There are other hurdles as well.  Preparing an international force for a setting as perilous as Haiti would be daunting in any circumstance but doing so with an ad hoc coalition of countries presents additional problems.

Some of these are structural and administrative.  The Council expects the mission to establish an administration akin to that of a UN-led operation: it needs to acquire the right law enforcement expertise and to fulfil detailed requirements in reporting to New York.

Because the troops will not be wearing blue helmets, the MSS and its contributing countries cannot rely upon the UN Secretariat’s automatic support to get these processes under way.

But that will not diminish the considerable political and operational scrutiny that the Security Council is likely to apply to the mission even before the first officers reach Port-au-Prince.  This scrutiny will be strongest regarding matters that tainted UN peacekeepers’ previous operations in Haiti.

MINUSTAH’s standing was deeply and tragically sullied by its role in spreading cholera and the implication of dozens of peacekeepers in cases of sexual exploitation and abuse.

The Security Council resolution creates safeguards to prevent such calamities from happening again.  It calls for adopting appropriate wastewater management measures to prevent the introduction and spread of waterborne diseases, and establishment of robust, safe and accessible mechanisms to present complaints and carry out investigations to address any allegations of misconduct, including sexual exploitation and abuse.

Knowing that repetition of any of these misdeeds would likely trigger a massive outcry in Haiti, a country already wary of foreign intervention, diplomats are likely to closely watch how the MSS performs in these areas.

How the mission coordinates with other UN bodies will be another important ingredient in its effectiveness.  BINUH, the above-referenced UN political mission now operating in Haiti, already supports the Haitian government in areas including political dialogue, elections, justice reform and violence reduction efforts.  It also has a mandate to help build the Haitian police’s operational and administrative capacities.

Furthermore, twelve different UN agencies, funds and programs assist Haiti in a wide range of development and humanitarian initiatives.

UN officials are quick to emphasise that the MSS is not a UN-led operation, in part to avoid direct association with the mission should it falter.

But alignment, if not direct collaboration, between the MSS and the UN as a whole will be critical to address the country’s interlocking political and security dilemmas.

IV. The Dilemmas of Taking on the Gangs

Foreign forces will encounter major operational hurdles as they seek to weaken the hold of Haiti’s gangs.  With the mission expected to number between 2,500 and 5,000 personnel – not all of them officers carrying out direct policing operations – Kenya, other contributing countries and Haitian authorities will have to carefully weigh their strategic priorities.

Given its limited scope, the mission is not intended to end Haiti’s gang problem once and for all.  But even seeking to achieve a limited set of objectives that could bring tangible improvements to people’s lives – such as regaining control of southern and northern gateways to the capital and restoring free passage on these roads – will, unless something changes, mean engaging in frontal combat with several gangs.

The gangs appear to be mulling two ways of responding to the mission’s arrival, according to interviews with people privy to the discussions.  On one hand, and despite the spike in inter-gang clashes, gang leaders are talking about reinvigorating the cooperative framework of Viv Ansanm, but this time for the purpose of forming a united front to face the foreign troops.

In fact, a mediator between the rival gang coalitions showed Crisis Group evidence that the main gang leaders in the capital continue to communicate with one another and might be willing to battle the foreign mission together.

Sources tell Crisis Group that, if the gangs perceive the Kenyan-led force as poorly equipped or trained and thus ripe for defeat, they will not hesitate to attack the troops.

If Viv Ansanm were to be revived to coincide with the mission’s deployment, it could give the gangs a significant boost and allow them to hit the international troops simultaneously on several fronts.

At the same time, however, these same gang leaders have also signalled that, if confronted with a force that has the evident capacity to overpower them, they would be willing to engage in discussions about how to disarm.

Even the most powerful gangs might ponder alternatives to engaging in direct combat with international personnel and local police after one successful operation against the groups.  Already, some gang leaders seem to be considering how to position their organisations politically and ideologically in order to garner greater popular support and prepare for talks.

Although their histories suggest otherwise, some gang leaders have claimed their groups’ fight is rooted in political causes.

Sources affirm that these leaders are interested in providing the gangs with a platform to start negotiations with a view to demobilisation should that seem the best course.

Assuming the mission does engage the gangs in combat, an outstanding dilemma for operational planners is how to protect civilians, particularly in Port-au-Prince, during offensive operations.

The most powerful armed groups have established strongholds in crowded slums in and around the capital.  Almost inevitably, mission personnel will be called on to conduct operations in these high-risk environments.  For example, in their attempts to retake critical infrastructure like the Varreux oil terminal – which sits in the gang-controlled Cité Soleil district of Port-au-Prince – as well as the roads linking the capital to the rest of the country, they will have to find their way through densely populated areas.

Some homes in these neighbourhoods are made of flimsy materials like wood and corrugated iron sheets, increasing the risk that stray bullets could hit those unable to flee.

Secondly, distinguishing between gang members and non-members in the civilian population will be difficult.  Most gang members in Haiti do not wear uniforms or any distinctive symbol, except the occasional balaclava; nor do they have protective gear that could identify them.

They also know their way around the labyrinthine territory under their dominion, allowing them to blend in and out of the civilian population.

The fact that very few of the foreign police officers will likely speak Haitian Creole (or even French) is likely to make interactions with residents harder, as the officers seek to ferret out the gang members.

Thirdly, collusion between the police and gangs will make leaked information another likely obstacle to operations.  Corruption in the police force is a widespread problem that not only involves rank-and-file officers but also reaches the upper echelons of the institution.

Two sources in the Haitian police who spoke separately to Crisis Group said senior commanders managed at least once to stop an operation to capture a powerful gang leader, allegedly because of the gangster’s links to politicians or members of the force.

Finally, not all communities may be fully receptive to the mission.  Even in areas where the gangs are very unpopular, the MSS will not necessarily be welcomed with open arms. The mission will have to contend with the hard reality that many Haitians have learnt to coexist with gangs that, for all practical purposes, have become local authorities.

Some residents of gang-controlled areas in Port-au-Prince told Crisis Group they have become apprehensive about Haitian police raids, as these operations not only fail to break the gang’s hold on their neighbourhoods, but also often spur gang members to retaliate against people perceived to be collaborating with the police.

V. Building Lasting Security

A. Preparing to Deploy

Haiti desperately needs international assistance, but the MSS must not be rolled out prematurely.

Haitian experts who spoke to Crisis Group expressed the hope that the international mission would be able to intimidate the gangs into cooperating by showing up in numbers and projecting impressive capacity.

One with deep knowledge of gang dynamics in the capital said: “[The mission] is going to have to focus on the perception of the balance of power, making a big show of force to let them know that if there are clashes, it’s all over for them”.

That scenario hangs on the hope that sufficient numbers of trained and equipped forces are available for the mission.  A thin, poorly prepared detachment would run the risk that gangs perceive weakness, press their advantage and tangle up the mission in knots.

Moreover, even if the MSS can muster an impressive show of force, it will need to be prepared for the possibility that the gangs will fight tenaciously in places where the mission is seeking to wrest territory from their control.

It will be up to the mission’s force commander to decide when the MSS is ready to deploy with sufficient confidence that it will make the situation better rather than worse.  In preparing to make that determination, certain steps may help.

The small advance contingent of … Kenyan police … should work with Haitian counterparts to map areas where gangs are dominant.

First, as the legal challenge to Kenya’s deployment makes its way through the Nairobi courts, the mission leadership should use the time to gain the best possible sense of the operating environment.

The small advance contingent of several hundred Kenyan police that is due to arrive in Haiti early in 2024 should work with Haitian counterparts to map areas where gangs are dominant, assess their firepower and understand the threat levels in places where the MSS is expecting to deploy.  They may wish to consider a strategy for asserting control in phases, first targeting areas with more accessible terrain, from which many civilians have already fled.

In planning initial operations, they should also contemplate ways in which the force can display its numbers and capabilities – including overflights by drones or helicopters or motorcades of armoured personnel carriers – to increase the potential for deterrence while taking care not to be provocative or create a risk of escalation.

Of course, none of this will be possible unless Kenya gets the financial and troop support that others have committed to make, and additional contributions to fill any gaps.

Having strong intelligence gathering capacity will also be important for success.  The mission could take cues from how MINUSTAH operated, establishing means of collecting information on gang activity from residents.

At the same time, the mission should take steps to protect operational security so that sensitive information is not compromised by the Haitian police, particularly given links between some officers and the gangs.

International partners should support the acceleration of vetting efforts already under way by BINUH, bolstering new special units whose members have all been thoroughly scrutinised (including, but not exclusively, the Unité Temporaire Anti-Gang, or U-TAG).

Vetting should be built up progressively in order to check not only all members of the special units, but eventually every police officer.

The MSS should also place civilian protection at the centre of their strategy, leaning on expertise in civilian harm reduction developed by the UN, the International Committee of the Red Cross and others.

Basic precepts range from having reliable information about the areas where combat will take place to giving advance warning to civilians in these places to enable evacuation planning.  This expertise will be especially important in designing rules of engagement for urban warfare that are protective of the civilian population, including with respect to selection of armaments.

As Crisis Group has recommended in the past, Haitian police and foreign mission personnel will need to be able to warn people in conflict-affected areas of coming operations and to help them leave their homes safely, while commanders should always consider how to create a corridor that will allow residents to get out of areas where fighting is raging.  The mission will need to have French speakers on hand for these purposes.

The MSS’s rules of engagement should also provide concrete instructions for addressing the challenges that self-defence groups could pose.  As noted above, some of the vigilante brigades that have proliferated since the Bwa Kale movement emerged have been cooperating with gangs in parts of the country.

MSS forces could come across these brigades, either working with the gangs or in self-defence mode, threaded among angry crowds seeking to lynch suspected criminals.

Either way, the best strategy for dealing with the vigilantes is to avoid these scenarios by trying to bring them onside as soon as possible.

As a first step, the police should make contact with the brigades and encourage them to collaborate with the authorities by providing information that may help to capture suspected gang members, while urging them to desist from carrying out acts of violence on their own.

Besides its mandate to counter the gangs, the mission will need to be especially well prepared to prevent gender-based violence committed by its own members.  The scandal of the “MINUSTAH babies”, the result of peacekeepers impregnating hundreds of women, many of them minors, before abandoning them, continues to cloud that mission’s legacy.  Foreign personnel should receive the requisite training before they deploy to prevent such cases from recurring.

The mission will also need training to address the gangs’ widespread use of sexual violence.  Ideally, foreign partners could also second at least one gender expert to help the mission monitor and report on any abuses, as well as pay local staff who can act as community liaisons to detect cases of sexual exploitation and violence early.  Women should of course also be appropriately represented among the deploying forces.

B. Critical Tasks for Enduring Success

Beyond the work that is required to prepare for deployment, certain key tasks will be critical to the mission’s enduring success.

The first will be to increase the number of police officers who can start working hand in hand with the MSS’s personnel and eventually be ready to take over from the mission.  International assistance – through BINUH and schemes such as the Joint Programme for the Haitian National Police (commonly referred to as the UN basket fund) – to bolster the Haitian National Police will have to be greatly expanded if Haitian authorities are to have a chance of building a stable police force that can keep gangs and other criminal organisations in check.

Consistent with the above recommendations, the continued strengthening of fully vetted special Haitian police units dedicated to joint anti-gang operations, and efforts to vet the entire force over time, could help build the local force’s capacity to collect and use intelligence for planning and conducting operations.

Strengthening the police and ensuring that offensive operations are effective will not be enough to consolidate state control in areas retaken by security forces.

Secondly, serious thought has to be given to what demobilisation of the gangs might look like.  Strengthening the police and ensuring that offensive operations are effective will not be enough to consolidate state control in areas retaken by security forces.

Killing or capturing top gang leaders is unlikely to prevent the reconfiguration of armed groups, and the removal of gang commanders may instead lead to escalating violence among factions that splinter from the original band, as has happened elsewhere.

Prisons are extremely overcrowded, meanwhile, and the justice system will be unable to handle the thousands of cases likely to reach it once the MSS starts arresting gang members, making an alternative route to allow these young men, many of them minors, to abandon violent crime indispensable.

The Haitian state, with support from foreign powers and donors, should look to establish demobilisation pathways for hundreds, or even thousands, of gang members.  These are sorely lacking at present.

President Moïse reactivated the National Commission for Disarmament, Dismantlement and Reintegration in 2019, but it is barely functioning, and its members have not been paid for more than three years.

Haiti and its international partners, particularly the UN (including the division of demobilisation, disarmament and reintegration of the Department of Peace Operations), should work with local mediators who have the gangs’ trust to design schemes that would enable individuals willing to defect to do so safely or to initiate group processes if an entire gang is willing to stop fighting.

C. Major Reforms and Initiatives

While quick wins by the MSS could help bring about a long-awaited improvement in Haiti’s security conditions, structural reforms will be needed to put a brake on the country’s cycles of violence.

Both Haitian authorities and the MSS should plan for initial policing operations in gang-affected areas to phase into a community policing strategy, aimed at building better links between civilians and the police in former gang bastions.

“A strategy to counter gangs based exclusively on aggressive crackdowns is unlikely to succeed”, said a former director of the Haitian National Police.  He argued that achievements in fighting gangs during his term were due, in part, to work that focused on improving trust between police and residents, which helped the police understand gang habits in these areas.

Mission staff, in cooperation with international partners and civil society organisations, should start identifying community leaders who can help the police establish solid connections with those living in gang-controlled territories.

The Haitian state, with the support of international donors, should also over time be prepared to launch programs aimed at rebuilding public facilities like schools, hospitals and police stations in these neighbourhoods.

Aside from the urgent need for better facilities, such projects would provide jobs, helping improve the livelihoods of thousands of vulnerable families.  Foreign government and private-sector support will be needed to create additional programs that can create stable, lawful employment opportunities for demobilised gang members.

For the country to make strides toward ensuring the safety of its citizens, two bases of the gangs’ enduring power will also have to be tackled.  Stemming the illegal flow of weapons and ammunition into the country, much of which comes from the region, including the U.S., the Dominican Republic and Jamaica, will be essential.

The Security Council’s July resolution renewing BINUH’s mandate urges member states to take all necessary measures to stop illegal arms from entering Haiti, “including through inspecting cargo to Haiti, in their territory”.  Washington is already enhancing its capacity to investigate and prosecute individuals involved in transnational crime, such as with the Transnational Criminal Investigative Unit being created in Haiti.

But there will additionally need to be robust, concrete measures to improve controls upon outbound shipments at the ports that send the most weapons and ammunition to Haiti, especially in Florida.

Individuals who support criminal groups and benefit from illicit activities such as international drug trafficking must be investigated and held accountable.

The other source of gang power that will need to be addressed is the strong bond between gangs and Haitian business and political elites.  Individuals who support criminal groups and benefit from illicit activities such as international drug trafficking must be investigated and held accountable, including through international sanctions, but also through prosecution of those for whom there is sufficient evidence of sponsoring violent groups.

Stronger intelligence gathering and international cooperation will be needed to sever the connections among politicians, businesspeople and gangs, which should remain an abiding concern for Haiti’s foreign partners as they seek to help the country combat gang violence.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Haiti’s political deadlock must be resolved.  There is still no straightforward route to establishing an elected government with strong public support.  Thus, Haiti’s international partners should continue pressing all sides to form a transitional government with broad-based backing.

Recent CARICOM-led negotiations, as well as dialogues led by other national and international mediators, point to divisions within the opposition.  Some groups insist that Henry fulfil his promise (made in the “21 December agreement”) of leaving power by February.  But many acknowledge he is unlikely to step down and worry that the mission’s arrival will inevitably strengthen his hand.

An agreement that includes Henry alongside the most important opposition figures, particularly those from parties that plan to participate in the next elections, is needed to create the foundation for a transitional government.  This government would then be charged with restoring functioning institutions, such as a Provisional Electoral Council, so as to pave the way for general elections.

For better or worse, this sequencing remains essential.  Should these polls be organised solely by Henry’s government, without support from other parties, tensions would be sure to rise even higher.

Haitians might also well distrust a rushed process that they perceive as partisan or opaque, reproducing the low voter turnout in the 2016 presidential election.  Polls lacking cross-party support could also see a repeat of the violence and institutional corrosion that followed the hastily organised elections after the 2010 earthquake.

VI. Conclusion

Haiti’s catastrophic wave of gang violence, not to mention its political breakdown and humanitarian emergency, have persuaded the country’s authorities and much of the public that there is no better prospect than armed support from abroad.

If well-planned and executed, the Kenyan-led multinational mission that is scheduled to send its first small contingent to Haiti in early 2024 may be able to give Haitians reprieve from the gangs’ depredations, setting the stage for reforms that will be indispensable for their future well-being.

But rigorous attention to both short- and long-term considerations will be essential to the mission’s success.  Should forces deploy before they reach the numbers and obtain the training that will allow them to operate effectively and with adequate protection for themselves and civilians in Haiti’s close urban quarters, then the gangs could well turn the tables on them, discrediting the whole enterprise.

Unless the force’s efforts are complemented by downstream reforms, and a political settlement that the country’s factions in government and opposition see as legitimate, then any good work it does could quickly be imperilled.

The prospect of an international mission to help restore Haiti’s security and address its humanitarian crisis offers Haitians a glimpse of safety and dignity.  It is essential that the opportunity not be wasted.

Wednesday, March 8, 2023

Factors compounding Haiti’s criminal markets for drugs and firearms

Haiti’s worsening national security crisis has the potential to generate regional contagion with global implications


Haiti’s security challenges


From the brief of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)


Haiti’s security issues
There are multiple factors compounding Haiti’s criminal markets for drugs and firearms.  Most obviously, Haiti features extensive land and maritime borders that are poorly monitored, guarded and defended. 

Indeed, Haiti has 1,771 kilometres of coastline and a 392-kilometre terrestrial border with the Dominican Republic.  Yet the country’s major seaports, border crossings and airports have a modest police and customs presence and virtually no air, sea or land surveillance capabilities.

There are also many public and private ports, irregular roads and clandestine airstrips that are poorly monitored and rarely patrolled.  As a result, large portions of Haiti’s frontier are porous and susceptible to transhipment of all manner of contraband, including narcotics and firearms. 

Another factor that influences Haiti’s criminal economy are its extensive dependencies on imports.  Indeed, every facet of the country’s formal and informal economy is connected to goods imported from abroad.  For example, approximately 80 percent of all rice and cooking oil and roughly 50 percent of all food products used by Haitians are imported.

As a result, there is extensive exchange of goods and services across Haiti’s borders, particularly ports and border crossings, very little of which is subject to scrutiny by POLIFRONT, customs and the HCG.  Notwithstanding changes in customs leadership in 2022 and extensive support from countries such as the US, France and Canada, Haiti’s policing and customs authorities are struggling to staff and resource their agencies, especially in frontier areas of the country.

They are not only unable to monitor the inflow of contraband but are themselves a frequent target of gangs.  Corruption and patronage networks also incubate thriving black markets.

Haiti has frequently been included among the world’s most corrupt countries.  In 2020, the World Bank scored Haiti 179 out of 190 economies in the ease of doing business.

Despite these challenges, the country’s anticorruption unit (ULCC) has made tentative inroads, including investigations into embezzlement of public property, the illegal award of contracts, misappropriation of funds and abuse of funds from the national to the local levels.  The ULCC has reportedly issued over 70 requests to the judicial authorities of political figures failing to declare assets.

However, deeply entrenched corruption in the criminal justice sector means that convictions are exceedingly rare. 

A majority of the legal and illegal products entering Haiti are offloaded from the country’s public and private seaports.  There are several public and private ports spread out across Haiti, with the largest cluster in Port-au-Prince and others in Cap Haïtien, Les Cayes, Miragoâne, Port-de-Paix, Petit Goave and Corai.

With some exceptions, these ports are in poor condition, intermittently operational and several are closed down indefinitely.

There are a significant number of private ports distributed across Haiti, including Gonaïves, Jacmel, Jérémie and Saint Marc, some of them involved in handling international shortsea shipments.

There are also large numbers of unmonitored, unmarked and informal landing areas on western and southern Haiti’s coasts, including docks, wharves and beaches that facilitate easy access for firearms and drugs shipments.

Owing to both the security situation and the derelict state of many ports, container traffic is primarily from major hubs such as Miami-Dade and Port Everglade in the US and routed to Haiti via neighbouring ports such in Freeport (Bahamas), Kingston (Jamaica), Manzanillo (Panama) and Colon (Panama).

In many cases, consignments are shipped to Haiti not by large container ships but rather via smaller feeder vessels.

According to Haitian customs officials, different Haitian ports are associated with different types of contraband.  For example, firearms and ammunition seizures are common on the western and north-western coasts including Port-au-Prince and Port-de-Paix, whereas drug interdiction is a more common occurrence on the northern and southern coasts of Haiti, notably Les Cayes, Jacmel and Jérémie.

Haiti’s primary and secondary road networks are also critical vectors for the movement of legal and illicit goods from the coasts to the Dominican Republic and from Dominican Republic into Haiti.

The principal road corridors consist of the RN1 running north-south from Cap Haitien to Port-au-Prince; the RN2 that that connects Port-au-Prince to Les Cayes in the south of the country; and the RN3 that stretches west to east from Port-au-Prince through Mirebalais and Hinche to the frontier with Dominican Republic.

Haiti also has many secondary road corridors of variable condition and more seldom, if ever, monitored by authorities.  Several gangs presently control key access points to the RN1, RN2, and RN3, particularly junctures connected to Port-au-Prince.  From there they can control territory, conduct kidnapping operations and extract illegal rents from passing vehicles.

Haitian and international authorities are preoccupied with how gangs have expanded their influence over access points to critical infrastructure and public facilities, presumably to strengthen their negotiating position with government authorities.

Gang federations such as the G9, for example, blockaded access to ports and restricted access to gasoline and diesel supplies, while calling for the resignation of high-level public officials.  Other groups such as the 5 Seconds gang have periodically controlled sections of the RN1, blocked port Latifo, Cimenterie and Moulins d’Haiti, occupied Haiti’s main courthouse, and even freed inmates from Titanyen prison.

Meanwhile, large gangs such as 400 Mawozo have controlled key sections of the RN3 on route to the Dominican Republic, while also facilitating drugs and firearms shipments, robbing merchandise, selling black market fuel and choking local economies.

Airports and clandestine runways are another means of shifting legal and illegal products in and out of Haiti.  Haiti has long served as a transit hub for the movement of cocaine, cannabis and to a lesser extent, heroin and amphetamines to the US and Dominican Republic.

Haiti’s official airport hubs are Port-au-Prince and Cap-Haïtien, with intermittent airline services available for Hinche, Jacmel, Jérémie, Les Cayes and Port-au-Paix.  There are several other runways located from Anse-à-Galets and L'île de la Gonâve to Port-Salut, though few of these are currently operational.

Following Haiti’s devastating 2010 earthquake, makeshift airstrips were hastily constructed to facilitate humanitarian assistance.

While not officially monitored by the Haitian government, clandestine runways were reportedly widespread across Haiti, though several strips were destroyed over the years by UN peace support operations in partnership with foreign and domestic authorities.

There are also indications that roads themselves have sometimes served as illegal runways for unregistered flights.

Although data on clandestine airstrips is limited, the case of Savane Diane in Arbonite is instructive .

HAITI’S CLANDESTINE AIRSTRIPS

A share of the cocaine shipped through Haiti and onward to foreign markets is transferred by air, including via illegal runways.  Since the 1990s, for example, Cessna aircraft flew laden with cocaine from Colombia destined for the US and landed on clandestine strips built in the outskirts of Port-au-Prince.

With the expansion of Haitian cities over the past three decades, landing strips were gradually surrounded and in some cases overrun by new settlements.

During the 2000s, drug traffickers moved illegal airstrips northward to more isolated areas, including Savane Diane in the Department of Arbonite, roughly 50 miles north of Port-au-Prince.

The scale of drug shipments moving via planes in Haiti allegedly expanded during the 2000s and 2010s.  During this period the UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) benefitted from reconnaissance and logistics to disrupt the building of such illegal runways, though these capabilities reportedly declined due to a lack of intelligence and resources.

Over time, the Savane Diane area, which since 2021 was designated a “free agro-industrial export zone”, has benefited from several major development projects, including some that are a few miles from airstrips known for cocaine and heroin deliveries.

According to HNP officials, many locals are aware of drug trafficking, and the area is littered with the wreckage of abandoned or destroyed planes, some purported to be discarded after transferring their cargo.

Savane Diane is suspected of having experienced an uptick in air traffic in May and June 2021, with thousands of kilos of drugs allegedly changing hands.

According to the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA), some planes also stopped and refuelled in Port-au-Prince even when the international airport was closed.

When President Moïse ordered the destruction of suspected clandestine airstrips in June 2021, including in Savane Diane, local authorities refused.  A week later, President Moise was assassinated. 

THE DYNAMICS OF FIREARMS SMUGGLING

There are no official statistics documenting the number or types of firearms in circulation in Haiti.  A 2020 report of the National Commission on Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration (CNDDR) estimated that there could be as many as 500,000 small arms in the country.  The CNDDR projection is double the estimate rendered by the UN in 2020 and HNP in 2015.

While the absolute number of weapons in Haiti may never be known, the vast majority in circulation are believed to be illegal.  According to the Superior Council of the National Police, the HNP registered just 38,000 “legal” firearms in 2015, less than 15 percent of the estimated national stock at the time.

Assuming these figures are remotely accurate, Haiti’s law enforcement agents are outgunned by Haitian residents, private security company personnel and armed gangs.

Firearms and ammunition enter Haiti in multiple ways.  Since Haiti does not officially manufacture firearms or ammunition, virtually all new rifles, handguns, magazines and bullets entering the country are imported either legally or illegally.

Very generally, several categories and calibre of firearms and ammunition are transferred lawfully to public and private authorities through licensed dealers and authorized transactions.  According to multiple ICE and DEA reports, however, a larger share of weapons, munitions, parts and components are trafficked into the country through networks of diaspora and brokers either in shipping containers, in air freight consignments, hidden in trucks and cars or carried by individuals.

Weapons that are trafficked from the US to Haiti may first move through a variety of intermediaries, including Caribbean ports or middlemen in the Dominican Republic, before reaching their intended users.

Haitians legally import firearms, ammunition and parts for both public security agencies and private security companies.

Although Haiti is subject to a US embargo, several amendments allow for export of certain firearms and munitions to Haitian security forces.  For example, in 2019, the US International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) awarded contracts for provisions of riot gear kits to the HNP. 

The US also increased its support for the HNP from $2.8 million in 2016 to over $12.4 million by 2020.  Direct assistance and training support is often delivered through intermediaries and established vendors.  And in 2022, the US and Canada expanded new commitments, including military and policing supplies, to the HNP.  Owing to weak oversight and controls, however, weapons and ammunition are periodically diverted and recirculated into civilian markets.

Owing to weak oversight and poor record-keeping, the dimensions of diversion of lawfully acquired firearms and ammunition are difficult to estimate.  Specifically, firearms and munitions managed by the HNP – whether procured for police officers or seized arms that are held in storage – can end up being resold into secondary markets or passed on to friends and family.

Likewise, handguns and shotguns legally acquired by registered private security companies and licensed users can be resold to unregistered users.

According to multiple sources, most new firearms and ammunition entering Haiti are smuggled into the country illegally by land, air and most frequently, sea.

Indeed, many firearms and ammunition seizures by Haitian customs officials are a result of inspecting containers heralding from the US and docked in Haiti’s public and private ports, particularly in Port-au-Prince.

A modest number of companies and private interests with access to ports and transportation logistics are often implicated in weapons and ammunition trafficking.

The principal source of firearms and munitions in Haiti is in the US, and in particular Florida.

Popular handguns selling for $400-500 at federally licensed firearms outlets or private gun shows in the US can be resold for as much a $10,000 in Haiti, though prices vary depending on local preferences and international supply.

Higher-powered rifles such as AK47s, AR15s and Galils are typically in higher demand from gangs, commanding correspondingly higher prices.

A network of criminal actors, including members of the Haitian diaspora, often source firearms from across the US.

Analysts speak of an “iron pipeline” that not only spans the US, but also shuttles firearms and ammunition to countries across the Americas, including Haiti.

Weapons are frequently procured through straw man purchases in US states with looser gun laws and fewer purchasing restrictions.  Once acquired, firearms and ammunition are then transported to Florida where they are concealed and shipped to Haiti.

Consignments may be assembled and delivered in containers directly from ports in South Florida, with items hidden inside consumer products, electronic equipment, garment linings, frozen food items or even the hulls of freighters.  On arrival in Haiti, including major hubs such as Port-de-Paix and Port-au-Prince, cargo is offloaded and passed on to end-users via a host of intermediaries.

Another means by which firearms and ammunition are shipped to Haiti is via the Dominican Republic and to a lesser extent Jamaica.

Media reports and interviews with Haitian customs officials suggest that weapons may first transit through key ports in Santo Domingo such as Haina, before being shipped across border crossings into Haiti, including from Jimani, Comendador and Elias Pina.

Officials at the Haina port alone reportedly seized over 112,000 “units of firearms and ammunition” in the first six months of 2022, most of them heralding from the US.

Haitian customs officials also periodically intercept contraband at the border – including firearms – intermingled with food products such as beans, flour and rice.

Firearms and ammunition have been seized at border crossings including Pedernales and Dajabon in Dominican Republic and Belladère, Malpasse and the Codevi tax free zone in Ouanaminthe in Haiti.

The extent of crossborder trafficking appears to be linked to the extent of police and customs presence as well as the extent of gang control.  For example, Malpasse recently registered a decline in the volume of crossborder transactions due to gang activity, resulting in a surge of illicit goods diverted through Belladère instead.

Haiti’s customs agents are operating in a context of extreme insecurity.  According to the director general of customs, multiple offices have been sacked and forced to close since September 2022, with several officials forced to abandon their posts.  For example, customs offices in Port-au-Prince, Saint-Marc and Gonaïves together with the Léogâne road checkpoint have all been vandalized.  Customs authorities also claim that Port Latifeau, the Malasse and Belladère customs offices and the Gantier road checkpoints are essentially “inoperative”.

Media have reported that a customs officer in Belladère was doused with gasoline by a purported smuggler in late December 2022.  The threat of kidnapping and ransom is ever present.

Meanwhile, in the US, Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), a unit of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), has reported a surge in firearms trafficking from Florida to Haiti between 2021 and 2022.  A spokesperson described the recovery of increasingly sophisticated arms including .50 calibre sniper rifles, .308 rifles, and even belt-fed machine guns destined for Haitian ports.

The US has linked the increased pace of purchases to gang activities in and around Portau-Prince.  For example, in May 2022, one of the leaders of the 400 Mawozo gang was extradited to the US under an arrest warrant connected to firearms trafficking.

The HSI has also launched a series of operations to scale-up interdiction measures in partnership with the ATF, the Department of Commerce, the Miami-Dade Police Department and the Attorney for the Southern District of Florida.

Growing international attention to firearms trafficking may be contributing to an increase in publicized seizures in Haiti.  On 1 July 2022, for example, 157 cases of munitions totalling over 120,000 rounds were seized in Port-de-Paix.

News reports indicated that vehicles with police plates were reportedly waiting nearby to transport the cargo via routes controlled by local gangs.

Another consignment of more than 25,000 cartridges was intercepted between 12 and 13 July 2022 while being transported on a public bus.

Meanwhile, on 13 and 14 July 2022, customs officials in Port-au-Prince reportedly intercepted several containers containing assault rifles, pistols, ammunition, and cash on a boat from Miami.

FIREARMS TRAFFICKING AND THE CHURCH

Haiti was recently rocked by a controversy involving a sophisticated arms trafficking network and the Episcopal Church.  In July 2022, Haitian customs authorities in Port-au-Prince intercepted containers addressed to the Episcopal Church and labelled as relief supplies containing semi-automatic weapons, handguns, and cash in Port-au-Prince.

The Church itself is not under investigation and has denied any direct involvement in arms trafficking.

The scandal shines a light on the privileged tax exemption status enjoyed by religious, non-governmental, and certain commercial institutions in Haiti.

The 1989 amendment to Haiti’s Investment Code allows certain customs privileges for non-governmental organizations and companies operating in designated sectors.  However, as rules were increasingly abused by those provided with exemptions, customs officials started more closely scrutinizing bills of lading.

An investigation led by an established human rights organization in Haiti, Reseau National de Defense des Droits Humains (RNDDH), offers a detailed timeline of the alleged weapons trafficking incident.

According to the report, three containers reportedly sent by the Episcopal Church arrived at Haitian customs in April 2022; after several attempts to verify their contents were blocked, rumours began circulating of possible malfeasance.

On 14 July 2022, Haitian customs authorities inspected the three containers that had been shipped by a Florida-based company.  While the first container did not raise suspicions, in the second container customs officials uncovered 17 5.56 and 7.62 semi-automatic rifles, four 3 and 40mm pistols, a shotgun, 12,779 rounds of 7.72 ammunition, thousands of rounds of 5.56, 9mm and 12-gauge ammunition, and at least $50,000 in counterfeit bills.

According to local news reports, Haiti’s BLTS and its Research and Intervention Brigade (BRI) were immediately involved in the inspection.  At least 12 people were identified as suspects in the smuggling of weapons, though just six were later arrested.  Among those charged by the police were church employees and a customs commissioner.

The latest uptick in firearm seizures together with intelligence and law enforcement reporting suggests that firearms trafficking between the US and Haiti is surging.  That said, it is important to be cautious with inferring trends from the limited data that is available.

The HNP do not yet have a capability to collate data or conduct traces on seized firearms.  For its part, UNODC has received no official information from the Haitian government on firearms trafficking in Haiti.

While the UNPOL office in Haiti collects statistics on firearms seizures from HNP, customs and other agencies, these datasets are incomplete.  Nevertheless, the data available do provide indicative trends on both categories of firepower and the volume in circulation.

A review of seized firearms reported by HNP and UNPOL from 2021-2022 provides some insight into the categories of weapons being used, the numbers in circulation and the location of their use.  Specifically, the largest share of firearms intercepted by the Haitian authorities during this period appear to be pistols, rifles and home-made weapons, including pipe guns, followed by revolvers and shotguns. 

Most reported seizures between 2021 and 2022 occurred in the West Department, where Port-auPrince is located.  The next highest cluster of seizures occurred in the North Department, including Cap-Haitien, followed by the Northwest, Center, and South Departments.  The breakdown of seizures also corresponds roughly with population concentration across Haiti but may also be correlated with policing priorities and capabilities.

DRUG TRAFFICKING DYNAMICS

Haiti has a long history of involvement in the international drugs trade.  The country emerged as a transit hub for cocaine heading to the US, courtesy of the Medellin Cartel in the late 1980s.

According to early media reports, Colombian criminal organizations moved dozens of tons of cocaine a year.

Powerful politicians and local business elites were allegedly involved for decades.

Over the years, at least a dozen countries have been connected to the drugs trade in Haiti and prominent nationals from Honduras, Mexico and Venezuela were arrested in Haiti by the DEA for their involvement in drug trafficking.

Most of the cocaine passing through Haiti appears to be sourced from Colombia and the cannabis from Jamaica.

Drugs may transit a range of countries and territories before and after arriving in Haiti, including Venezuela, Bahamas, Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic and Turks and Caicos.

Different drugs take different routes both getting to and leaving Haiti. Haiti is primarily a transit country for the movement of cocaine and cannabis.

While there are periodic seizures of crack, heroin, fentanyl, amphetamines and local products, these are widely regarded as a comparatively low priority by international and domestic law enforcement.

An analysis of official data on drug routing, seizures and related offences involving cannabis and cocaine in Haiti between 2020 and 2022 is revealing.

With respect to drug routing, the vast majority of cannabis herb and cannabistype drugs arriving to Haiti were from Jamaica.  Likewise, the majority of cannabis herb and other cannabis-type drugs leaving Haiti were destined for the Dominican Republic, supposedly to feed tourist demand.

Destination countries for cocaine include the US, along with Canada, France and Switzerland, among others.

There are multiple reported sources, entry points, and vectors for transhipment of cocaine and cannabis in Haiti.  For one, cocaine is believed to be sourced primarily from Colombia, including via Venezuela.

Owing to a lack of laboratory testing, there is limited insight into whether cocaine seized in Haiti comes from production in other countries such as Bolivia or Peru.

Cannabis is sourced from Jamaica, though Haiti has limited domestic production of poorer quality herb. 

The most common entry points for drugs include Hanche and Jacmel, Port-au-Prince and Cap Haitian to the north.

Key border crossings for the transit of drugs out of the country include Malpasse as well as less monitored secondary routes across the mountainous terrain of southern Haiti into the Dominican Republic.

Product enters Haiti directly on containers or via GPS-tagged parcels retrieved offshore by go-fast boats and then offloaded in private ports or coastal areas to be shipped by land to the Dominican Republic border.

Although most cocaine, cannabis and heroin transiting Haiti are reportedly destined from US and Western European consumers, including in the Dominican Republic to supply foreign tourists, there are anecdotal reports that narcotics are also integrated into domestic criminal markets.

In a country suffering from extreme poverty and inequality, there are significant pay-outs for political and economic elites, customs officials, law enforcement agents, gang leaders and a host of other intermediaries in the physical retrieval, shipment and storage of drugs and protection of illegal networks.

What is more, cocaine itself may be used as a medium of exchange among criminal groups, including for acquiring firearms and ammunition.

In addition to being consumed by local elites, drugs are also shared among the rank and file of gangs and serve a modest demand in larger Haitian cities.

Notwithstanding the dearth of published studies on drug use in Haiti, national authorities contend that there is comparatively low domestic drug consumption in Haiti.

The head of the Haitian drug observatory (OSV) for the national commission for the fight against drugs (CONALD), reported in 2020 that there were modest increases in the consumption of locally produced drugs among youth and women.

Given the comparatively low incomes of most Haitian residents, it stands to reason that there may be only modest consumption of cocaine, most likely restricted to wealthier residents.

The Haitian authorities oversee small-scale public awareness initiatives and demand reduction services funded through CONALD, though the impacts are unknown.

While Haiti has long served as a transhipment hub, increased instability may be influencing its attractiveness to traffickers.

There are several attributes that continue to make Haiti a magnet for the transhipment of drugs.  For one, it lacks an effective maritime control capability.

The HCG consists of fewer than 200 officers and oversees a fleet of a dozen vessels, though only one is reportedly operational, four require repairs, and seven are no longer functioning.

The country’s drug enforcement agency, BLTS, has just one functioning boat for maritime interdiction. 

Customs officials lack remote scanning and X-ray facilities, reducing the scrutiny of incoming cargo.

And while countries such as the US, Canada and France have invested in strengthening local customs and police capacities, particularly in the north of the country, Haiti lacks meaningful surveillance and patrol infrastructure at the border.

The continued high levels of cocaine production in source countries and increased gang influence in Haiti are additional factors that suggest that the HNP may only be capturing a modest share of the drugs passing through the country.

A review of UNPOL and HNP trend data on drug seizures between 2021 and 2022 sheds some light on the dynamics of drug transhipment in Haiti.  Both the information and the analysis should be treated as inferential given the uneven nature of data collection.

As in the case of firearm seizures, it is not possible to specify empirically whether Haiti is experiencing changes in the scale or prevalence of drug transhipment.  For example, an increase in reported drug seizures on its own can be interpreted in multiple ways – signalling that drug enforcement capacities have increased, that drug shipments expanded, some combination of the two, or another independent variable.  Even so, the assessment offers temporal insights into the types of drugs being seized, a generic overview of the volume being captured and the locations over time.  The high level of seizures over the past two years in a context of diminished HNP capacity may indicate that drug flows are relatively stable, though more research is needed.

A review of 2021-2022 drug seizures suggests that, compared to the longer-time series, quantities of intercepted of drugs declined.  A relatively small number of major cannabis seizures account for the overwhelming share of all drugs intercepted (by quantity).  Cocaine seizures are stable, with just a scattering of low yield seizures between 2021-2022.  All told, there were five metric tons of cannabis herb seized in total and a little over 67 kilograms of cocaine (from January 2021 to December 2022), though it is not clear to what extent this may be an undercount.

As noted, it is not advisable to infer trends from the data featured in this report, including whether the overall extent of drug transhipment is rising or declining.

Seizure data also provides some insight into the scale of product that transits through Haiti.  For example, between 2000 and 2022, the extent of cannabis herb and cocaine intercepted varied from year to year, although there was negligible interception of crack, heroin or amphetamines.

Cannabis herb seizures oscillated from a few hundred kilos to several thousand kilos, with a peak in 2014 of some 4,321 kilos.  Cocaine seizures vary from single digits to several hundred kilos, with a high point of 335 kilos seized in 2012.

The extent of seizures over the past few years would suggest that Haiti’s role as a transit country has not necessarily diminished, nor has it increased dramatically.  However, unverified reports of major drug shipments via Haiti in 2021, for example, warrant further examination.

The relative importance of Haiti as a hub for cocaine shifts when accounting for seizures destined for Haiti or arriving to separate ports from Haiti.  Indeed, some experts believe that cocaine trafficking to and from Haiti may have peaked in the 1990s and early 2000s and has steadily declined since then.

In 1999, for example, the DEA estimated that approximately one fifth of all Colombian cocaine consumed in the US transited Haiti, as much as 67 tons a year.  In 2015, it was reported that authorities failed to seize an estimated 700-kilogram cocaine and 300-kilogram heroin shipment in Port-au-Prince’s Varreux port, an incident that continues to be shrouded in mystery.

Another 907-kilogram shipment of cocaine was reportedly seized from a Haitian vessel by US authorities in Miami in 2016.

And in 2017, a 410-kilogram shipment of cocaine headed to Haiti was intercepted in Colombia.

These large intercepted shipments are in stark contrast to the modest cocaine seizures in Haiti proper with approximately 32 kilograms seized in 2021 and 35 kilograms in 2022 (see Table 4).169

IMPLICATIONS AND RESPONSES TO FIREARMS AND DRUG TRAFFICKING

Haiti’s worsening national security crisis has the potential to generate regional contagion with global implications.  If the country’s security and development institutions disintegrate, a significant international response will be required, including large-scale relief assistance and a stabilization or peace support operation.

At a minimum, years of recovery and development investment are unravelling.  Organized violence is being deployed as a well-defined strategy on the part of gangs and their backers to subdue populations and expand territorial control.

According to Haiti’s UN Special Representative, at least five million Haitians are facing acute hunger and education and health services, already faltering, are on the verge of collapse.

INTERNATIONAL

Against a rapidly deteriorating security situation, the UN Security Council has demanded an immediate cessation of violence and urged all political actors to engage in meaningful negotiations and hold free and fair elections.

The UN Mission, BINUH, has urged political dialogue while several civil society groups produced a “national consensus document” to recommend practical steps toward an election within 18 months.

The National Consensus Agreement for an Inclusive Transition and Transparent Election was signed on 21 December 2022 and called for elections by February 2024.

The Haitian government has signalled its inability to stabilize the country on its own, as evidenced by the request for the deployment of an international specialized security force.

The Security Council has said it would “welcome” the force and the UN Secretary-General has likewise urged support for a multinational rapid reaction force that would “support the HNP”, primarily in the Portau-Prince metropolitan area. 

A fundamental priority in Haiti is the restoration of security and stability, including in relation to the control of firearms availability and transhipment of drugs.

The Security Council has repeatedly expressed concerns about the illicit trafficking and diversion of arms and related material that are undermining human rights and the provision of assistance.  It has also underlined the need to prohibit the transfer of weapons to non-state actors and urged Member States to provide and exchange timely and up-to-date information on illicit trafficking supply chains.

Moreover, the Security Council has stressed the need to disrupt the links between political and economic actors and gangs, as well as ensure more access of the HNP to areas controlled by armed groups.

To this end, the Security Council has established a sanction regime with travel bans, freezes on funds and financial assets and targeted arms embargoes for key individuals and entities associated with criminal activities, including those benefiting from the proceeds of illicit production and trafficking in drugs.

Resolution 2653 also established a Panel of Experts to gather, examine and analyse information on the sanctions measures, including the source and routes of arms trafficking to Haiti and incidents undermining the political transition.

Sanctions were also issued in late 2022 by some Member States targeting Haitian political and economic elites believed to be directly and indirectly assisting Haitian gangs acquiring drugs, firearms and ammunition, though the extent to which these will be enforced remains to be seen.

REGIONAL

Regional measures to control firearms and drug trafficking must accompany in-country support.  To this end, Caribbean countries are scaling-up operations to seize illicit firearms and drugs across the region. 

A recent example is Operation Trigger VII in September 2022 led by the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Implementation Agency for Crime and Security (IMPACS) and INTERPOL together with US agencies such as HSI, ATF, the Joint Regional Communications Center and law enforcement agencies from at least 19 countries.

The week-long operation seized 350 firearms, 3,300 rounds of ammunition and “record” hauls of illegal drugs.  Police reportedly arrested over 510 people and seized more than 10.1 metric tons of cocaine and over 2.5 metric tons of cannabis.

Notwithstanding the recent operation, regional organizations have yet to craft a coherent strategy with Haiti.

CARICOM IMPACS is exploring proposals to support stockpile management and destruction measures and investigations, but a more comprehensive and sustained engagement is needed.

Amid reports of increased trafficking of firearms from Florida to Haiti and after designating Haiti a “major drug transit” country, the US increased interdiction efforts on the mainland and in Haiti.

In the US, agencies such as HSI, ATF and others established a Border Enforcement Security Task Force in order to “ramp up efforts to stem the flow of illicit weapons in Haiti and the Caribbean”.

ICE also opened an office in Port-au-Prince to coordinate efforts, and committed extra resources to close down smuggling routes, confiscate funds and disrupt money laundering.

Meanwhile, the Organization for American States (OAS) has also affirmed its concern with the deteriorating situation in Haiti.  The OAS Secretariat has urged Member States and permanent observers to urgently offer direct support to the Haitian authorities to improve training of port security agents, particularly with respect to the fight against firearms trafficking.

The OAS has underlined the importance of devoting more resources to strengthening the capacities and means of the HNP to restore order in the capital, Port-au-Prince.

Moreover, the OAS has set up a working group on Haiti, taking note of measures adopted by the Security Council, in particular the provisions of resolutions 2645 regarding arms and ammunition trafficking and 2653 on sanctions.

Ultimately, regional cooperation must extend beyond a narrow focus on interdicting firearms and confiscating drugs.  Indeed, the CARICOM region must also engage with a range of issues that shape Haiti’s security challenges, including criminal networks and migration and human trafficking.

To this end, a priority for the region is the reinforcement of early warning mechanisms and rapid coordination measures to support preventive strategies and operational activities.  A greater emphasis is needed to promote the sharing and exchange of experiences among member states across the region, as well as with other counterparts.

NATIONAL

The principal focus of international and national efforts to promote stability is on reinforcing the capabilities of the HNP.

Haitian authorities have emphasized the importance of practical support for anti-gang operations and the prevention of sexual violence, including the deployment of international police advisers embedded in specialized HNP units.

Other areas of focus include expanding the number of trained officers, continued vetting of recruits, expanded community-focused policing capabilities and the restoration of police stations destroyed in gang-controlled areas.

Governments have been urged to provide equipment, including tactical vehicles, as well firearms and ammunition.  Any such actions must be accompanied with stringent oversight and management measures to avoid diversion, as well as efforts to strengthen the capacities of the Haitian government, including the HNP, to stem the trafficking of firearms and ammunition.

The UN Security Council has repeatedly stressed the importance of reinforcing the capacities of HNP and its specialized units focused on borders, drugs, firearms, sexual crimes, the protection of minors and the anti-kidnapping cell.

UN representatives have also underlined that efforts must be Haitian-led and that additional measures to prevent and reduce armed violence, including in “hot spots” near critical infrastructure, are warranted.

These calls are not without precedent.  Security system reform has been a priority in Haiti for years.

For almost three decades, international partners have sought to strengthen police leadership; improve recruiting, vetting and training opportunities; provide equipment and build facilities; and improve overall operational capabilities.

Although Haiti has registered progress, its police, customs and coast guard agencies remain far too small in size, unevenly trained and under-resourced.  For example, the HNP has a ratio of 1.06 officers per 1,000 residents, well below the 2.2 per 1,000 recommended by the UN.

Owing to the deteriorating security environment in 2022, several efforts are underway to rapidly expand support to the HNP and associated border and customs agencies.  For example, several Member States transported several armoured vehicles to Haiti in 2022 and 2023 to support counter-gang operations. 

Meanwhile, international partners launched a new multi-donor security basket fund to mobilize support for the HNP and have raised $17.8 million by the end of 2022.  Several Member States are also focused on ensuring continued support to the HNP academy and HNP school to ensure ongoing professional training and development of new recruits and serving officers.

A concern expressed by several experts was the risk of the de-professionalization of the HNP and the dangers of deteriorating morale.

The challenges are formidable: at the end of January 2023, media reported that HNP officers had taken to the streets in protest of recent killings of police officers by armed gangs, and in the process blocked roads, attempted to break into the residence of the Prime Minister and temporarily trapped the Prime Minister himself at the airport.

The HNP leadership subsequently announced the launch of a counter-offensive against the gangs, Operation Tornado 1.

Assistance is also needed to expand HNP numbers and capabilities, including in relation to counternarcotics, with support provided to BLTS, POLIFRONT and the HCG.

For their part, US officials contend that the HNP needs to expand to at least 22,000 officers and address persistently low operational capacity, insufficient funding, fuel shortages and management shortfalls.

Likewise, greater investment is required in strengthening SWAT capabilities, community- and place-based policing, improving investigations and chain of custody, criminal justice sector reform and modernizing data collection, analysis and sharing (including laboratory capacities) across agencies.

An essential priority in the short- to- medium-term is the reinforcement of Haiti’s justice and penal systems that have been degraded by gang-related violence and chronic funding gaps.

Haitian authorities are stepping-up action to bolster legislation to control firearms.  For one, the HNP has reportedly suspended all firearms licences amid concerns about rising unrest, though it is not clear how this act is being enforced.

Haiti is the twelfth country to commit to adopting the Caribbean Firearms Roadmap (signed in 2020), an initiative of CARICOM and the Dominican Republic.

As part of its commitment, Haiti drafted a National Action Plan (NAP) to address illegal firearms in the country in 2022.

In line with the Roadmap, the NAP updates the regulatory framework for governing firearms and ammunition, outlines a strategy for reducing illicit flows across Haiti’s borders and calls for the reinforcement of law enforcement capacities to fight trafficking and decrease diversion from state and non-state arsenals.

The NAP was prepared in partnership with the UN Regional Centre for Peace, Disarmament and Development in Latin America and the Caribbean (UNLIREC) and awaits approval by the Prime Minister. 

There is an urgent need to centralize the regulation and management of firearms.  The NAP could help Haiti evolve a single focal point for managing firearms control issues across government.  Likewise, strengthened firearm legislation could usefully clarify rules and responsibilities.

Firearm control measures are currently managed under the Central Division of the Administrative Police (DCPA).  But the DCPA’s carry permit service (Service de Porte d’Armes à Feu, or SAF) lacks a clear mandate, personnel and material resources.

Support to strengthen the SAF could also include a functional civilian firearms database as recommended in the draft NAP.  Moreover, stockpile management processes could be usefully reinforced, a theme raised in prior UN evaluations.

Additional assistance could be directed toward standardizing procedures for investigating (e.g. handling and tracing) seized firearms, tasks currently managed by the Central Direction of the Judicial Police. 

Any measures to control weapons and seize drugs must be further accompanied by improved transparency and accountability over political and economic actors who may be involved in trafficking, illicit financial flows and supporting armed groups with financial resources and material.

International partners are determined to prioritize anti-corruption measures in the medium-term.  Haiti only recently classified corruption as a crime in 2014, after which penalties were established for bribery and illegal procurement.

Strengthening Haiti’s Unit for Combating Corruption is essential to curb drug and firearms trafficking.  So too is upgrading the country’s judicial system, including to address outdated penal and criminal codes, inadequate judicial oversight and reported widespread systemic corruption.

As of 2022, there have been just five successful convictions of drug trafficking and one corruption conviction in Haiti.

Moreover, there are several longer-term challenges related to drugs and illicit firearms that will also require careful attention after Haiti’s security situation is stabilized.  For one, there are risks that local drug consumption, particularly among younger Haitians, could increase, and public services are under-funded and ill-prepared to address the consequences. 

Other priorities include investments in community violence prevention and reduction, including through integrated programmes emphasizing the restoration of territorial control and resumption of services for young at-risk residents.

Even if an immediate focus of support to Haiti is on law and order, these longer-term priorities cannot be neglected.  Ultimately, sustained assistance and institutional reforms will be required to restore basic public security, criminal justice, border control and customs institutions, to support Haiti’s path out of crisis.

Source/Full Brief