Showing posts with label Tariff. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tariff. Show all posts

Thursday, April 3, 2025

What about Trump Tariffs?

When a government imposes tariffs, ITS OWN PEOPLE PAY!


Trump's Tariffs


WHAT ABOUT TARIFFS? 

By Professor Gilbert Morris
Nassau, NP, The Bahamas


Trump Tariff
One of our young princes - the artist Sheldon Saint - asked me to explain about tariffs.  And whilst it’s a pleasure to answer one of my beautiful sons of Grand Bahama, it turns out that it’s my job, as my title is “National Public Reader of The Bahamas”; which means in times of crisis, I am to explain the crisis to my fellow Bahamians.

Well, what a silly little ditty this “Liberation Day” has been; a veritable cult of nonsense, on the US imposition of tariffs, even in geographic areas with no people; although birds do fly!


LET’S GET AT THE TECHNICALS: 

So, the administration actually thinks it’s some sort of equation:

1. To create a rate based on each country’s US trade surplus

2. Divided by their US exports!


DC ECONOMICS - a think tank - provided a good basic example:

a. US trade deficit with Indonesia is $17.9 billion

b. Indonesia’s exports to US is $28 billion

c. So: $17.9/$28 = 64%, which Trump claims is the tariff rate Indonesia charges the U.S.

So the Trump administration is using a nation's trade deficit with the U.S., divided by the nation's exports to the U.S.

But that’s not a trade equation…as such the Trump tariff rates are arbitrary and will lead to economic convulsions for Americans as I will show below!


THERE’s ONE MORE TECHNICAL POINT:

1. The Trump administration claims to have assessed tariff and non tariff barriers in calibration to determine the effective tariff rates.

2. That would mean Trump divided the US trade deficit with a country using imports and then multiplied by half; judging by the rates.

3. Part of the reason this is NOT a trade formula is no homogeneous elasticity for those countries on whom 10% across the board has been imposed, instance.

4. Simply, their calculations do not capture the reality of trade and it can’t with dozens of countries treated exactly the same or territories (French ones) treated as countries when their trade is counted already.

5. Moreover, to gain a clearer perspective, they would need some sort of elasticity/time passthrough that dovetails to 1 as a baseline.

6. Nothing in Trump’s calculus captures the elasticity of trade or the range of U.S. dependencies, like potash from Canada.


NOW LET’S GO TO GENERAL EXPLANATIONS:

There are some unimpeachable basics:

1. The imposer of tariffs pays.  For example: In Trump’s previous administration, he had to subsidise the agricultural industry by $34 billion to offset their loses from his bizarre tariff regime.

So let’s be clear:

1. If Americans import an auto from China which costs $50,000 and

2. There is a 50% tariff on that auto…

3. Then the American pays China $50,000 dollars (the cost of the automobile),

4. Then the auto is shipped to America,

5. Then the American must pay the 50% tariff on $50,000 which is $25,000 to the US government.

When a government imposes tariffs, ITS OWN PEOPLE PAY!

Yes it’s like customs’ duty that we - The Bahamas, Jamaica and Barbados (which has one of every tax known to humankind), pay on items;

EXCEPT

A tariff is a penalty and customs duty is a tax.

That is, we aren’t trying to force another country to behave a certain way by using customs duty.

It’s just a lazy unimaginative way to tax citizens.

That’s what we do!

2. ⁠Whilst the imposer of tariffs pays (raising domestic costs, engendering unemployment, collapsing small businesses), those upon whom tariffs are imposed may lose market share or share of sales in whatever products are affected; unless they can diversify demand.

So, in our China example above: when an American buys a product from China and the U.S. imposes a tariff, that item becomes more expensive for Americans or in America.

So imagine you own Dollar Rent-a-Car and you were paying just the $50,000 for each auto to China.  Then the US government adds the 50% tariff, that means for no reason, your cost for each automobile just increased.

10 automobiles would have cost you $500,000 at $50,000 each.  Now suddenly without warning the exact same automobiles cost you $75,000 each or $750,000!

If you are a company - FedEx or rental cars, or limousine service or taxi company - your government just drove your costs upward for no benefit to you!

Now imagine appliances companies, clothing companies, furniture, technology, medical equipment, building supplies…all these companies would experience higher costs, which they must now add to their retail prices and so customers pay the higher costs.

Additionally, if companies can’t pay it, they let employees go so they can stay in business.  This is how tariffs lead to unemployment.  And remember, 70% of all jobs in America are small businesses.

LET’S GET A BIG PICTURE PERSPECTIVE:

3. ⁠The US - 4% of world population but 34% of global consumption - which means that’s hard to replace.  But U.S. borrows 80% of global savings.

Therefore - if you can believe it - it’s placing tariffs on those who finance its consumption!

This is a more complex point:

US debt is over $30 trillion.

So where do they get the money to consume?

They borrow it.

Where from?

From you!

Alright - lil gapseed here - you need to stop lying.  We know you’re not supposed to have US bank accounts without Bahamas Central Bank approval…but we know your lil corruption at Bank of America.  But it turns out 80% of global savers think their money is safe in the United States…as you do!

So the U.S. uses your savings as borrowed money to finance their consumerism.  (It’s more complex than that…but that’s the basics).

The point is: why impose tariffs against countries whose citizens are financing US debt through savings in America?

It shows how interdependent America is and how delusional are these polices.  Because you have those savings owing to more competitive productive environment - Mexico, Vietnam, China, etc - in your country rather than in the U.S... but when you’re paid, you hold your savings there, giving them access to cheap loans.

So what happens to China or Mexico or Vietnam when the tariffs hit their economies?

Well, as I said, they pay nothing.

Americans pay.

But Americans may decide not to buy that Chinese auto because they don’t want to pay $75.000 for an auto that cost them $50,000 yesterday.  That means sales in China, Mexico, Vietnam etc may slow down.  And obviously, if sales slow down, they earn less money.

But this is complex: so for instance, there are some items on which the U.S. can’t hold tariffs for too long or it would destroy industries in America; such as steel and aluminium from Canada or potash also from Canada.  There are critical tech components of life saving medical equipment from China, Vietnam and textiles from Indonesia.  So what will happen is whilst talking loudly, the U.S. would relax tariffs on those items…because US hospitals and national security firms will demand that the US government change the policy to avoid disastrous impacts.

Also, China, Mexico and others could find new customers in other countries; which is the easiest option…whilst waiting out the U.S.!

But, they could also reduce their currency values buy some share the tariff amount.  So if the tariff is 10%, they could reduce their currency value by 5%.  This would absorb the tariff to some degree and make that automobile I mentioned closer to the original $50,000 price and so the tariff would have less of an impact, at least theoretically.

4. ⁠For Caribbeans: just yawn.  This is a piffle.  We should ignore these tariffs: The Bahamas exports around half a billion in goods, some bonded…so about 5% to 7% of GDP.

But since we sell so little to the U.S., you see how stupid it is putting tariffs on us.  In my economics classes, I teach that we are a “loop economy”: that means no matter how much money we earn from the U.S., we go right back and save or spend it in the U.S.  So it’s stupid to put any hurdle on The Bahamas and we are the only country in the world (with Turks and Caicos) where this is so.

For Jamaica and to some degree Guyana, the matter is more complex as they export higher shares of GDP to the U.S.  But even they can offset tariffs quietly and expertly.

The truth is: We do more to damage our economic prospects than Trump’s tariffs can!


Source / Comment

The Bahamas Government Responds to U.S. President, Donald Trump 10% Reciprocal Tariff

U.S. President, Donald Trump 10% Reciprocal Tariff on Caribbean Countries - including The Bahamas




Tariffs USA
The Government of The Bahamas has taken note of the announcement by U.S. President Donald Trump to impose a 10% reciprocal tariff on several Caribbean countries, including The Bahamas, that export duty-free to the United States under the Caribbean Basin Initiative (CBI).  It is important to note that The Bahamas currently maintains a trade deficit with the United States.

We will engage with our U.S. counterparts and work collectively with our CARICOM partners in response to this development.  The Government has approved a National Trade Policy aimed at diversifying trade.

As part of our broader strategy to protect the Bahamian economy, we have already announced a number of measures, including the development of a trade diversification framework.  We remain focused on minimizing the impact of global trade decisions on Bahamian businesses and consumers.


Source

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

We Learn from Canada Trudeau Errors in Response to Trump's Tariff Big Stick

Justin Trudeau Errs


CANADA IS RIGHT TO STAND UP; BUT IT MUST LEARN TO ACT WITH STRATEGIC STEALTH!


By Professor Gilbert Morris
Nassau, The Bahamas


Trudeau Errors
Seems unwise that Canada should telegraph its every move against US financial aggression.

If Canada knows - for instance - that 6 million U.S. homes depend on Canadian energy…make the moves necessary to bring that to bear without telegraphing.  Undertake surgical strategies to offset interdependencies, by whatever degree of stealth is possible.

One can’t win a narrative war.

Let Trump awaken to the consequences of his decisions by their actual impacts.

America’s apparent dominance - to speak in such terms - are really a network of teeming interdependencies through which it has been allowed to appear dominant singularly.

That is fragile.

And Canada has been complicit in sustaining American dominance; including choking Cuba to death illegally and financing the slaughter of 50,000 Palestinians.

It’s not enough to whine and claim victimhood.  Canada must in its actions atone for its complicity as handmaiden to serial villainy: for instance, it should end the effectiveness of the Cuban embargo by leveraging its massive agricultural prowess in Cuba; solving their food production and distribution problems.

Such a strategy would not merely help the Cubans, but it would punch a hole in the embargo, whilst providing regional states - which have also been complicit - with alternative access to agriculture.

Things how one break those interdependent linkages, expose fragilities and system anomalies which are weaknesses appearing as strategy’s, by enacting counter-measures against key US industries, rather than against the U.S. itself…and beyond mere talk and showboating.

It strikes harder and more deeply and in that way, does so in a manner that’s difficult to incite revenge.

Small nations must master such methods!


Source / Comments

Friday, October 18, 2013

...a push to The Bahamas government for the enactment of a Food Security Tariff ...to ensure that what is produced locally is available to the Bahamian public

Eneas Calls For Food Security Tariff



by Korvell Pyfrom
Jones Bahamas


Agricultural expert Godfrey Eneas yesterday made a push to the government to enact a “Food Security Tariff,” which he said will give better market access to local producers.

Mr. Eneas, who also serves as The Bahamas’ Ambassador to the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), noted that The Bahamas’ food system has to overcome significant barriers.

“I will shortly propose to the minister that we introduce a Food Security Tariff to ensure that what we produce is available to the Bahamian public,” he said. “Food and nutrition security in The Bahamas will not be a reality without the cooperation of local food importers who, at the moment, control the food market.”

Mr. Eneas was among the speakers at a ceremony commemorating World Food Day at Arawak Cay.
As The Bahamas’ representative at the FAO he explained that world hunger is among one of the greatest challenges facing mankind.

“Many of us in this country take food for granted,” Mr. Eneas said.

“If you need some rice, meat, eggs, vegetables we go to the food store. However, there are scores of countries where food is not readably available because of poverty – food is unaffordable, because food production has been adversely affected by factors like climate change, the inability to purchase or obtain inputs like seeds, fertilizer, pesticides or the harvest has been destroyed by pest and diseases.

“One out of every eight people globally suffers from hunger. Feeding mankind has become a very complex undertaking.”

He noted the significance of this year’s World Food Day theme, “Sustainable Food Systems for Food and Nutrition Security” and reminded that The Bahamas imports $1 billion dollars’ worth of food.

“We depend on the global food system because our food system is woefully inadequate,” Mr. Eneas said. “With reference to our present food system and its ability to provide food and nutrition security, there are serious shortcomings which, I am happy, to say are being addressed.”

October 17, 2013

The Bahama Journal