Showing posts with label V Alfred Gray. Show all posts
Showing posts with label V Alfred Gray. Show all posts

Friday, September 2, 2011

The Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) is sitting on the sidelines taking pot shots at a man call Hubert Ingraham - who is getting the job done to relieve the Bahamian people's suffering in the wake of hurricane Irene's damage in The Islands

Alfred Gray worries about PM's reputation


tribune242 editorial


ACCORDING TO MICAL MP V Alfred Gray, Prime Minister Ingraham has "corrupted" himself by accepting the Aga Khan's helicopter to tour the Bahamas' hurricane damaged islands. According to Mr Gray, the Prime Minister, to protect his reputation, should instead have taken a plane, which Mr Gray claimed was available.

Obviously, Mr Gray is completely unaware of the conditions in the islands, and is oblivious -- either by design or ignorance -- that an aircraft cannot effectively cover the same territory in such conditions.

For example on Monday when four US Army Black Hawks landed at Odyssey Aviation because of bad weather, Prime Minister Ingraham was getting into the Aga Khan's 12-passenger helicopter to fly to Abaco.

According to Met Office reports that day, severe thunder and lightning storms were expected between 3 and 6pm, and persons were advised to stay indoors. The Black Hawks were in, the helicopter was out. By 9.45pm the Prime Minister and the press were back at Odyssey as lightening flashed and thunder rolled. The weather was not good, our son, who was on the trip, informed us.

No aircraft could have covered the territory that the Prime Minister did that day. What aircraft could have hovered near roof tops, landed in settlements and islands to avoid flooded airstrips and fly below the thunderstorms that kept planes out of the air?

On that day, the Prime Minister's party landed at Sandy Point, Moores Island, Coopers Town, Blackwood, Murphy Town, Treasure Cay, Green Turtle Cay and Marsh Harbour. How could he have covered this distance in an aircraft? Where would the plane have landed and how many lost hours would it have taken to travel by car and ferry to these settlements? Not only did the terrain make such a trip impossible, but he could have never made so many stops, seen so many people and got back to Nassau on the same night. In three days travelling by helicopter -- two days courtesy of the Aga Khan -- the Prime Minister has practically covered all of the stricken islands.

Yesterday -- leaving at 8am and returning at 9:30pm - again in the Aga Khan's helicopter, the Prime Minister flew to Crooked Island and Acklins, and touched down in Exuma to refuel. Because of the difficulty of getting fuel, the helicopter could not continue on to Mayaguana and so a Defence Force aircraft picked him up at Acklins, flew him to Mayaguana, then to San Salvador and back to Nassau.

Mr Gray talks of an available aircraft that Mr Ingraham could have taken. We would like to know what aircraft he was talking about, because no one else seems to know about it.

"The PLP are sitting on the sidelines taking pot shots at a man who is getting the job done," a Bahamian sarcastically commented. "They are just jealous because they can't get the Aga Khan's helicopter or any other helicopter to get there. If they say a plane was available why didn't they take it themselves and make a contribution to help the people?"

Is the Aga Khan -- a man noted for his generosity and his philanthropic work -- to be treated like a pariah in this country, because he is digging a canal at his Bell island property - for which he already has a permit, and does not have to depend upon Mr Ingraham to give him anything. The Aga Khan, whose Aga Khan Development Network has the environment in its portfolio, is unlikely to do anything that will damage the environs at Bell Island. The prince is probably more aware and concerned about protecting the environment than any PLP will ever be.

Is this generous man's offer to help the people of the Bahamas in their hour of need to be turned down, because one Alfred Grey, who believes that the Prime Minister should take more time to "walk and talk and touch and look in people's eyes and see their hurt and pain," is now feigning concern for the Prime Minister's reputation? Mr Grey is sitting on the sidelines, playing the cheapest kind of politics and making himself and his party look ridiculous.

In this hour of need we believe Mr Ingraham is more interested in helping his fellow Bahamians than worrying about his reputation -- he'll leave that to Mr Gray.

Mr Ingraham decided to take the most effective way to cover as many settlements as he could in the shortest possible time, so that supplies could be dispatched as quickly as possible.

We are certain that the injured man in Cat Island, wasn't concerned about what helicopter flew him to Nassau for medical attention. Incidentally, it was not the Aga Khan's helicopter, but that of an equally generous friend of the Bahamas -- all of this at no cost to the Bahamian taxpayer.

Instead of saying thanks, Mr Grey wants to talk of corruption.

While Mr Gray has announced that he intends to start an appeal for donations from lumber yards for assistance to rebuild homes, Mr Ingraham -- who is moving too fast for the snail-paced PLP -- has already arranged for supplies to be sent in for the rebuilding to start.

If the PLP cannot do anything, they should at least have the decency to keep their mouths shut. Now is not the time to add politics to a people's suffering.

September 01, 2011

tribune242 editorial

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

George Smith - former Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) MP says that he hopes his party's supporters will see the wisdom in his words about the withdrawal of certain PLP candidates from the upcoming general election

Ex-PLP MP defends controversial letter


By PAUL G TURNQUEST
Tribune Staff Reporter
pturnquest@tribunemedia.net



DEFENDING the letter he co-penned calling for the withdrawal of certain PLP candidates from the upcoming general election, former PLP MP George Smith said that in the passage of time he hopes his party's supporters will see the wisdom in his words.

Speaking with The Tribune yesterday, Mr Smith said he, with former PLP chairman Raynard Rigby and former campaign coordinator Philip Galanis, were not being critical of these particular candidates because they believed what was being said about them - but rather there is a "perception" that surrounds some of them.

"If the public perceives you to be something, that is what you are. I don't believe that anybody, principally the leader, can put affection for any individual above the good of the Bahamas, the good of the party, and I believe - since I believe the PLP is the best party in the Bahamas - we should remove as many stumbling blocks as possible. And it is not always easy to do that. Sometimes you have to ask your best friend to move aside," he said.

Mr Smith was referring to a letter that he, Mr Rigby and Mr Galanis wrote to PLP leader Perry Christie urging him to block the nominations of Shane Gibson, Vincent Peet, Obie Wilchcombe, V Alfred Gray, Leslie Miller, Anthony Moss and Picewell Forbes for fear that their nominations could hurt the party on a national scale if the varied pasts of some of them were once again highlighted during a general election campaign.

The PLP's leader went on record to express his disappointment that this "internal" letter had been leaked to the press.

However, Mr Christie said, he was not going to be distracted by this latest incident and that his party remains focused on supporting the "excellent candidates" and hardworking activists who comprise his party.

Vetting

"Each and every candidate is required to undergo a vigorous vetting process - a process that is open, fair and transparent. All voices are welcome, and the process is both balanced and inclusive," Mr Christie said.

While accepting this, Mr Smith said that a requirement not to run "tainted" candidates does not come from a fear that the FNM will gain some political mileage, but rather a belief that the people of the country ought to have faith that the people who represent them in Parliament will always put the welfare of the country above their own personal interests.

"That has to be obvious. If the public believes you are in there to enrich yourself, even if you don't, if the public believes it, they will question your activities.

"And, it's like if a fella' has a weakness in a particular area, if he is for instance a gambler, you have to be very careful how you expose him to the great temptation of money. That got one politician in trouble.

"Or if a fella' is a heavy womanizer, you have to be careful that you protect him from his own weakness.

"And some of us became victims and paid prices because of perception and that is how it is."

Mr Smith said that this advice is, of course, applicable to the FNM as well.

"They have people there who the people have had cause to question, Tommy Turnquest, and Dion Foulkes, and you have to recognise that my actions in this instance will do damage to my party," he said.

Mr Smith also highlighted, however, that he does believe in rehabilitation.

"If any wrong that I may have committed, if I was sentenced to a prison term, I would have been out long time. But I also believe that our society should be a forgiving society. So if some of these fella's would just step aside and acknowledge that my action in this particular thing was wrong, and not because it was legally wrong, it was perceived to be wrong. Step aside, and come back," he said.

Mr Smith gave the famous example of Jamaica's former Prime Minister, PJ Patterson, who was forced to resign as the Minister of Finance to later return as chairman of his party and then eventually become Prime Minister.

"I also believe that the problem we are facing in this country is, I am not sure if (Prime Minister) Ingraham and other people who call themselves leaders look at themselves and look and say am I a liability?" he laughed.

Having been roundly criticised on the talkshows for the now infamous letter, Mr Smith said people have a right to "cuss him."

But, at the end of the day he asked, "is my message right?"

May 18, 2011

tribune242