By ADRIAN GIBSON
ajbahama@hotmail.com:
FORMER Minister of State for Immigration Branville McCartney's resignation is being seen as a political rebellion in certain quarters of the FNM, as attack dogs and a number of disgruntled, diehard FNMs are having fits of hysteria and are already hurling scurrilous and cheap potshots from behind the curtain of anonymity. From this week on, Mr McCartney will be wading through a political minefield.
Throughout the Bahamas, Bran McCartney is heralded as a hard worker, a young man who understands the true purpose of parliamentary representation of his constituents. The former minister's genuine concern for the nation's youth was on display last November in a speech and subsequent question and answer session given during a class I lectured at the College of the Bahamas.
Admittedly, Mr McCartney's resignation from Cabinet, while serving as a first-term junior Cabinet Minister and parliamentarian has led to comparisons to bumbling former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin who herself resigned before serving a single, full-term. All-in-all, however, Bran McCartney is not the divisive figure and calamitous Jane that Sarah Palin has turned out to be.
Bran McCartney's resignation on his personal convictions, shows that he has the kahunas to stand up for his beliefs whatever they might be and this might, in the long run, catapult him to the top of the leadership totem pole as Prime Minister and FNM leader Hubert Ingraham's successor while--in time--potentially also earning the PM's admiration.
Mr Ingraham has not said anything disparaging about Mr McCartney and he appears to be such an astute politician that amidst all the political brouhaha, he is focused enough to direct his attention upon the PLP's election court challenge and other issues instead of being found to be in open combat with the very popular Mr McCartney.
Dr Dexter Johnson, lawyer and medical doctor, addressed Mr McCartney's resignation and potential leadership of the FNM stating:
"In a situation with two exhausted leaders, the focus must be upon a replacement. The recent by-election and debate served to heighten the profile of potentially new leaders. The pretenders in the PLP and FNM are obtaining zero mileage at this time. The system of the past is not bringing the best leaders forward.
"The change in the immigration ministry's policies had put Mr McCartney in park--indefinitely. If he crosses the floor, the Ingraham administration would fall," he asserted.
Dr Johnson went on:
"Mr McCartney would be a welcome addition to a third party. His arrival would immediately catapult a third party into the political stratosphere and could be a platform to show his uninhibited vision. His arrival would immediately make a third party a contender as it would have a credible Parliamentary voice."
It seems highly unlikely that, even after submitting his resignation, Mr McCartney would cross the floor.
The timing of the former junior minister's resignation may be of concern to some, particularly as it follows an extremely acrimonious Elizabeth by-election campaign and has led to overarching concerns about his political plans, especially how his resignation--with the FNM in a seemingly precarious state--could affect his aspirations for leadership.
Frankly, in the wake of a closely-contested, yet undeclared by-election, the FNM must be uncertain of exactly what the electorate thinks and whether public apathy is directed towards the party and its governance. While Mr McCartney's resignation has reverberated throughout the archipelago, his resignation would have been more resonant had it been submitted immediately after the Prime Minister decided to temporarily grant status to the Haitian migrants housed at the Detention Centre following the catastrophic earthquake in Port-au-Prince. At that time, the PM's decision to release the Haitians-- even with temporary status -- was met with a chorus of dissent and questions about its legality as local radio talk shows were bombarded by livid callers. Indeed, there is a paralyzing fog of disbelief and outright cynicism being expressed in some quarters about the Prime Minister's decision. It has been alleged that Mr McCartney was not consulted and felt that it was a usurping of his power and authority as Minister of State in-charge of the Department of Immigration.
It has also been alleged that Mr McCartney had a running feud with substantive minister and DPM Brent Symonette, who some contend may have sought to tie his hands on certain immigration matters.
Indeed, while questions run rife about whether the Bamboo Town MP's resignation will further cripple the FNM in terms of its support, I believe that he is a chap with the gravitas to stand against the grain. However, diehard FNM supporters, despite their belief that he possesses leadership qualities, may be more concerned about party over self--irrespective of how principled one might be. Although Mr McCartney has exhibited the attributes, abilities and intellect that are commendable traits to propel him to leadership as opposed to an aptitude to simply be a sycophant complying with political dictates, today, even the slightest misstep could lead to another man (McCartney) who would-be "king" being permanently ushered out of the throne room.
Are the voting delegates and council members willing to view an individual's abilities or, at the end of the day, will party supersede any principle that a person holds?
It is my belief that when Charles Maynard--who is not seen as the brightest spark in the Cabinet--was appointed the substantive Minister of Youth, Sports and Culture after a abysmal performance as a junior minister, Mr McCartney possibly felt snubbed.
Sources assert that the former state minister believed himself to have been overlooked and cast aside.
Furthermore, unlike certain members of the current and past Cabinets, Mr McCartney is not overly dependent upon a Cabinet job, as he has publicly admitted to being independent, financially secure and to have used his ministerial salary in the constituency.
After the dust settles in Elizabeth, it is said by certain FNM insiders that McCartney could be displaced. If Elizabeth serves as a catalyst for what 2012 holds, there will then be a strategic plan for counting seats within both of the major parties, with each party distinguishing the seats that are must-haves in its column in the instance that the election is close. These must-have seats must also be contested by diehard candidates. That said, I doubt that Mr McCartney will be punished and relocated to contest another constituency.
When former Bamboo Town MP Tennyson Wells initially broke ranks with the FNM/PM Ingraham, the constituency association continued to support him as an independent. Mr Wells was shown that they stood with him, only to later part ways upon being won over by Mr McCartney's arrival and the realization that an independent could do little for the constituency.
As it regards Mr McCartney's possible succession to PM Ingraham as FNM leader, the issue of his ability to galvanize the voters across the political spectrum to vote for the party must also be taken into account. Moreover, if history serves as precedent, future leadership challengers within the major parties may also need the blessings of previous leaders--as seems to be the norm in the Bahamas. Will Mr McCartney earn Mr Ingraham's support, particularly as Dr Duane Sands is slated to eventually become the next FNM leader?
Before the arrival of Mr Ingraham, the FNM was viewed as the elitist, Republican Party of the Bahamas. Since then, Mr Ingraham's leadership has increased support for the party across the electoral spectrum. As PM Ingraham seeks to close an illustrious political career, it remains obvious that the FNM has yet to find homegrown talent to become a true leader-Prime Minister material. Will Bran McCartney be that man?
March 11, 2010
tribune242
A political blog about Bahamian politics in The Bahamas, Bahamian Politicans - and the entire Bahamas political lot. Bahamian Blogger Dennis Dames keeps you updated on the political news and views throughout the islands of The Bahamas without fear or favor. Bahamian Politicians and the Bahamian Political Arena: Updates one Post at a time on Bahamas Politics and Bahamas Politicans; and their local, regional and international policies and perspectives.
Thursday, March 11, 2010
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Tommy Turnquest: New voter register to start in April
By Candia Dames ~ Guardian News Editor ~ candia@nasguard.com:
The government is preparing to start a new voter register, and plans to use the latest technology to help ensure that mistakes that arose on the register used for the 2007 general election are kept at an irreducible minimum, according to Tommy Turnquest, the minister responsible for parliamentary elections.
Turnquest said the government will begin a new register in April.
"We will like to ensure that a new register of voters is compiled, one that would show that persons are where they say they live," he said.
The process for a new register will be the first since Election Court judges said two years ago that the Pinewood challenge had exposed "the most egregious failures in the parliamentary system."
That ruling was handed down by Senior Justice Anita Allen and now Senior Justice Jon Isaacs.
At the time of the controversial Pinewood matter, the judges said, "The parliamentary commissioner failed, for whatever reason, to ensure the integrity of the registration process in Pinewood."
Turnquest said the Parliamentary Registration Department will be given the time and resources it needs to do its work right.
"The reason why we want to start early is so that we have sufficient time to ensure that all those potential errors are eliminated to the maximum extent possible," he said.
Turnquest said the department will engage in intense cross checking in its efforts to cut back on mistakes on the new register. He said this attention to detail was evident in the department's work leading up to the February 16 by-election in Elizabeth.
"I think that as a result of what they did, as a result of what the political parties did, a large number of persons who no longer live in Elizabeth didn't show up," he said.
Commenting on the importance of giving the department enough time and resources to do its work, the minister said, "There's nothing more important than having free and fair elections in a democracy. It doesn't matter who you vote for, but it has to be one person, one vote, that you are supposed to vote where you live and only where you live."
As noted previously by Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham, Turnquest said it is the primary duty of the prime minister to ensure a clean register and to have free and fair elections.
"And he intends to do so," Turnquest said. "As his minister responsible, it is my duty to ensure that's carried out."
Ingraham said repeatedly during the lead up to and after the recent by-election that whatever is wrong with the current register is the fault of former prime minister Perry Christie.
While stressing that he does not wish to offer any public commentary on what the Election Court judges said in the Pinewood ruling, Turnquest said yesterday he thought it was unfortunate that Parliamentary Commissioner Errol Bethel did not have an opportunity to tell his side of the story during the Pinewood case.
"I try not to comment on decisions of the court for obvious reasons, but I thought the parliamentary commissioner ought to have been given an opportunity to put his position with regard to some of the errors associated with the last general election," the minister said.
"The Parliamentary Elections Act and our constitution accords for a Boundaries Commission that is supposed to meet every five years and is supposed to present a report to Parliament, and that is supposed to be done in sufficient time to allow any changes that have to take place... Unfortunately, prior to the last general election in May 2007, the boundaries report wasn't concluded until the beginning of April, and so they had very little time to make changes and get cards back to persons and have all of that before the May elections."
Turnquest said that as a result many people found themselves registered in the wrong polling divisions and in the wrong constituency.
"And so, I thought it somewhat unfair to chastise the parliamentary commissioner without taking it further to find the root of the problem, and we're going to ensure that at least the root is taken care of this time by making sure that we do it in sufficient time and that the parliamentary commissioner and his staff will have sufficient time to ensure that the register is clean."
Wednesday 10, 2010
thenassauguardian
The government is preparing to start a new voter register, and plans to use the latest technology to help ensure that mistakes that arose on the register used for the 2007 general election are kept at an irreducible minimum, according to Tommy Turnquest, the minister responsible for parliamentary elections.
Turnquest said the government will begin a new register in April.
"We will like to ensure that a new register of voters is compiled, one that would show that persons are where they say they live," he said.
The process for a new register will be the first since Election Court judges said two years ago that the Pinewood challenge had exposed "the most egregious failures in the parliamentary system."
That ruling was handed down by Senior Justice Anita Allen and now Senior Justice Jon Isaacs.
At the time of the controversial Pinewood matter, the judges said, "The parliamentary commissioner failed, for whatever reason, to ensure the integrity of the registration process in Pinewood."
Turnquest said the Parliamentary Registration Department will be given the time and resources it needs to do its work right.
"The reason why we want to start early is so that we have sufficient time to ensure that all those potential errors are eliminated to the maximum extent possible," he said.
Turnquest said the department will engage in intense cross checking in its efforts to cut back on mistakes on the new register. He said this attention to detail was evident in the department's work leading up to the February 16 by-election in Elizabeth.
"I think that as a result of what they did, as a result of what the political parties did, a large number of persons who no longer live in Elizabeth didn't show up," he said.
Commenting on the importance of giving the department enough time and resources to do its work, the minister said, "There's nothing more important than having free and fair elections in a democracy. It doesn't matter who you vote for, but it has to be one person, one vote, that you are supposed to vote where you live and only where you live."
As noted previously by Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham, Turnquest said it is the primary duty of the prime minister to ensure a clean register and to have free and fair elections.
"And he intends to do so," Turnquest said. "As his minister responsible, it is my duty to ensure that's carried out."
Ingraham said repeatedly during the lead up to and after the recent by-election that whatever is wrong with the current register is the fault of former prime minister Perry Christie.
While stressing that he does not wish to offer any public commentary on what the Election Court judges said in the Pinewood ruling, Turnquest said yesterday he thought it was unfortunate that Parliamentary Commissioner Errol Bethel did not have an opportunity to tell his side of the story during the Pinewood case.
"I try not to comment on decisions of the court for obvious reasons, but I thought the parliamentary commissioner ought to have been given an opportunity to put his position with regard to some of the errors associated with the last general election," the minister said.
"The Parliamentary Elections Act and our constitution accords for a Boundaries Commission that is supposed to meet every five years and is supposed to present a report to Parliament, and that is supposed to be done in sufficient time to allow any changes that have to take place... Unfortunately, prior to the last general election in May 2007, the boundaries report wasn't concluded until the beginning of April, and so they had very little time to make changes and get cards back to persons and have all of that before the May elections."
Turnquest said that as a result many people found themselves registered in the wrong polling divisions and in the wrong constituency.
"And so, I thought it somewhat unfair to chastise the parliamentary commissioner without taking it further to find the root of the problem, and we're going to ensure that at least the root is taken care of this time by making sure that we do it in sufficient time and that the parliamentary commissioner and his staff will have sufficient time to ensure that the register is clean."
Wednesday 10, 2010
thenassauguardian
Monday, March 8, 2010
Bahamian history repeats itself in Jamaica
Tribune242 Editorial:
"WE'RE going through very stressful times," a leading Jamaican businessman admitted yesterday as the government of Jamaica and the United States were locked in judicial debate over one of that island's well known "dons" -- "The President of Tivoli", or in real life, Christopher "Dudus" Coke.
Coke controls Tivoli, Jamaican Prime Minister Bruce Golding's constituency. There are those who maintain that it is Coke who keeps peace in Tivoli, and if it were not for him Golding would not be where he is today.
The US's request for Dudus' extradition on a long list of gun and drug trafficking charges sent shock waves through Jamaica. For the past three weeks the Jamaican government has refused the request.
Prime Minister Golding is resisting extradition on the grounds that under Jamaican law the acquisition of the evidence against the Tivoli don, which supports the extradition request, violates the provisions of the Interception of Communications Act. And so, at present, the US request cannot go before a Jamaican court until the Attorney General signs the order. Prime Minister Golding says the attorney general has a "duty to protect the constitutional rights of Coke and not extradite him."
Many Jamaicans question the delay. Some say government should get it before the courts and let the courts make the final decision. But until the attorney general signs, nothing moves forward.
In a sharply worded exchange the State Department said the delays in the Coke case, in addition to the temporary suspension in processing of all other pending requests, raised "serious questions" about the Jamaican Government's commitment to combating transnational crime.
There is even talk in Jamaica that the US law enforcement agents could kidnap Coke and put him before a US court. Apparently, there is no clause in the existing extradition treaty between Jamaica and the US to prevent it. But there is certainly precedent for it. In 1992 US agents kidnapped Alvarez Machain, wanted for kidnapping and murder, from his Mexico home and took him to the US.
Also causing further confusion is the sudden suspension last week of the US visa of another leading Jamaican citizen -- Wayne Chen. The Jamaican government claims that his visa has nothing to do with the Coke case, which has started speculation down another path. Mr Chen is still without his visa.
Many Jamaicans worry that they have been without a US ambassador for a year and three months -- "never before in living memory has that happened," said a citizen in pained surprise.
Which takes us back to the ugly eighties in the Bahamas during Ronald Reagan's administration when this nation had no ambassador for two years. And, yes, drugs was the evil nematode at the bottom of it all.
("Nematode", a favourite word of former attorney general Paul Adderley. In one of his flights of verbal fancy on the floor of the House he called a Tribune reporter a "nematode". However, we think the word better suited to the world of crime than to a reporter trying to do an honest job of reporting during a corrupt era).
During that period the Bahamas-US relations were conducted by US Chargé d'Affaires Andrew Antippas. This situation continued for two years until an ambassador was finally appointed. The Pindling government did not approve of Antippas, nor did Antippas approve of what was happening in the Bahamas on the drug scene. On the eventual arrival of the ambassador, Mr Antippas became the Deputy Chief of Mission. However, the Pindling administration made certain that he did not hold that position for long. They made life so difficult for the Antippases that in order to patch up relations the new ambassador -- a non career diplomat -- had to dismiss Mr Antippas so that "good friends who occasionally disagree" could start to mend fences.
But in 1988, Mr Antippas had the last word. He agreed to testify in the trial of Colombian Joe Lehder who had a free pass to Norman's Cay under the Pindling administration. Norman's Cay became the headquarters of Lehder's drug empire. And Andrew Antippas told the story of how he had to advise the US property owners to abandon their properties and leave the island because the US Embassy could no longer give them protection in the Bahamas.
"I testified to all that I had tried to accomplish against Lehder and the Bahamas' unwillingness to cooperate and that really blew a fuse in Nassau," Mr Antippas told the world.
The same fuse is now being blown in Jamaica. Dudus Coke might as well go quietly, as go he will, dragging Jamaica's reputation in the mud behind him.
March 08, 2010
tribune242
"WE'RE going through very stressful times," a leading Jamaican businessman admitted yesterday as the government of Jamaica and the United States were locked in judicial debate over one of that island's well known "dons" -- "The President of Tivoli", or in real life, Christopher "Dudus" Coke.
Coke controls Tivoli, Jamaican Prime Minister Bruce Golding's constituency. There are those who maintain that it is Coke who keeps peace in Tivoli, and if it were not for him Golding would not be where he is today.
The US's request for Dudus' extradition on a long list of gun and drug trafficking charges sent shock waves through Jamaica. For the past three weeks the Jamaican government has refused the request.
Prime Minister Golding is resisting extradition on the grounds that under Jamaican law the acquisition of the evidence against the Tivoli don, which supports the extradition request, violates the provisions of the Interception of Communications Act. And so, at present, the US request cannot go before a Jamaican court until the Attorney General signs the order. Prime Minister Golding says the attorney general has a "duty to protect the constitutional rights of Coke and not extradite him."
Many Jamaicans question the delay. Some say government should get it before the courts and let the courts make the final decision. But until the attorney general signs, nothing moves forward.
In a sharply worded exchange the State Department said the delays in the Coke case, in addition to the temporary suspension in processing of all other pending requests, raised "serious questions" about the Jamaican Government's commitment to combating transnational crime.
There is even talk in Jamaica that the US law enforcement agents could kidnap Coke and put him before a US court. Apparently, there is no clause in the existing extradition treaty between Jamaica and the US to prevent it. But there is certainly precedent for it. In 1992 US agents kidnapped Alvarez Machain, wanted for kidnapping and murder, from his Mexico home and took him to the US.
Also causing further confusion is the sudden suspension last week of the US visa of another leading Jamaican citizen -- Wayne Chen. The Jamaican government claims that his visa has nothing to do with the Coke case, which has started speculation down another path. Mr Chen is still without his visa.
Many Jamaicans worry that they have been without a US ambassador for a year and three months -- "never before in living memory has that happened," said a citizen in pained surprise.
Which takes us back to the ugly eighties in the Bahamas during Ronald Reagan's administration when this nation had no ambassador for two years. And, yes, drugs was the evil nematode at the bottom of it all.
("Nematode", a favourite word of former attorney general Paul Adderley. In one of his flights of verbal fancy on the floor of the House he called a Tribune reporter a "nematode". However, we think the word better suited to the world of crime than to a reporter trying to do an honest job of reporting during a corrupt era).
During that period the Bahamas-US relations were conducted by US Chargé d'Affaires Andrew Antippas. This situation continued for two years until an ambassador was finally appointed. The Pindling government did not approve of Antippas, nor did Antippas approve of what was happening in the Bahamas on the drug scene. On the eventual arrival of the ambassador, Mr Antippas became the Deputy Chief of Mission. However, the Pindling administration made certain that he did not hold that position for long. They made life so difficult for the Antippases that in order to patch up relations the new ambassador -- a non career diplomat -- had to dismiss Mr Antippas so that "good friends who occasionally disagree" could start to mend fences.
But in 1988, Mr Antippas had the last word. He agreed to testify in the trial of Colombian Joe Lehder who had a free pass to Norman's Cay under the Pindling administration. Norman's Cay became the headquarters of Lehder's drug empire. And Andrew Antippas told the story of how he had to advise the US property owners to abandon their properties and leave the island because the US Embassy could no longer give them protection in the Bahamas.
"I testified to all that I had tried to accomplish against Lehder and the Bahamas' unwillingness to cooperate and that really blew a fuse in Nassau," Mr Antippas told the world.
The same fuse is now being blown in Jamaica. Dudus Coke might as well go quietly, as go he will, dragging Jamaica's reputation in the mud behind him.
March 08, 2010
tribune242
Friday, March 5, 2010
Branville McCartney’s Master Political Stroke
By Dennis Dames:
The resignation of Branville McCartney as junior minister of immigration in the Ingraham cabinet has created a lot of intense political talk around the town. It was a master political stroke that the public welcomes and appreciates – in my view.
The move has shown up the political weaknesses and complacency of the likes of Zhavargo Laing, Tommy Turnquest, Carl Bethel, and other young but politically sluggish FNMs – who appear strictly comfortable with a good and prestigious job, and clearly lack the political ambition and vision necessary to keep the torch of a young generation burning with robust confidence and anticipation.
They have long forgotten one of the chief planks in the FNM propaganda campaign prior to the 1992 general election. It was term limits for a prime minister and party leader. We did not want Pindling to reign for life; nor do we want Ingraham to do the same. We demand a system that promotes political competition, and dynamic and progressive leadership. We do not believe that two Bahamian women have born one leader each that are exclusively capable of leading the affairs of our nation.
Mr. McCartney is in tuned with the status quo – that is ready for a new and prosperous brand of politics in The Bahamas. Hubert Ingraham and his PLP counterpart – Perry Christie - are expired products lingering unattractively on the Bahamian political shelf. They have become trite in the eyes of the people who long for a new era of political leadership and direction.
Brad McCartney has essentially said: Here I am, send me! He has signaled his interest in becoming leader of the FNM in short order. He has put his dull colleagues on the spot, and has told the masses that he is not interested in being a friendly neighborhood yes-man who is prepared to go with the unpopular flow of political window dressing and shameless underhandedness from the top.
Branville McCartney represents a new breed of politicians in The Bahamas - who are eager to serve the people with a progressively ambitious and productive agenda. He appears ready to tackle the vexing illegal immigration issue that has plagued The Bahamas for decades and even to this day – for example.
He looks ready to change the bureaucratically uncreative business as usual mentality in government, and replace it with an administration for and by the people. Brad McCartney is a budding leader who has challenged an old order in Bahamian politics that seems determined to enforce its detested will on an electorate longing for change that they really can believe in.
The resignation of Branville McCartney has a lasting impact on modern Bahamian politics. It signals a revolution in the making in the national political landscape.
It is hoped that Mr. McCartney would not relent in his drive for higher political office and social, economic, and political deliverance for a deserving people; as doing so will only result in a serious political backlash – like that of Algernon Allen when he turned thousands on to his one man game on the R.M Bailey Park some years back – then he bucked under heavy political pressure and returned shamelessly to his vomit. The rest is hard-to-swallow history.
Only time will reveal the genuineness of Mr. McCartney’s recent decision. The masses are watching with buoyant enthusiasm, and optimism. It is worth taking this matter sincerely Mr. McCartney, or the political exit heartlessly awaits you.
Bahamas Blog International
The resignation of Branville McCartney as junior minister of immigration in the Ingraham cabinet has created a lot of intense political talk around the town. It was a master political stroke that the public welcomes and appreciates – in my view.
The move has shown up the political weaknesses and complacency of the likes of Zhavargo Laing, Tommy Turnquest, Carl Bethel, and other young but politically sluggish FNMs – who appear strictly comfortable with a good and prestigious job, and clearly lack the political ambition and vision necessary to keep the torch of a young generation burning with robust confidence and anticipation.
They have long forgotten one of the chief planks in the FNM propaganda campaign prior to the 1992 general election. It was term limits for a prime minister and party leader. We did not want Pindling to reign for life; nor do we want Ingraham to do the same. We demand a system that promotes political competition, and dynamic and progressive leadership. We do not believe that two Bahamian women have born one leader each that are exclusively capable of leading the affairs of our nation.
Mr. McCartney is in tuned with the status quo – that is ready for a new and prosperous brand of politics in The Bahamas. Hubert Ingraham and his PLP counterpart – Perry Christie - are expired products lingering unattractively on the Bahamian political shelf. They have become trite in the eyes of the people who long for a new era of political leadership and direction.
Brad McCartney has essentially said: Here I am, send me! He has signaled his interest in becoming leader of the FNM in short order. He has put his dull colleagues on the spot, and has told the masses that he is not interested in being a friendly neighborhood yes-man who is prepared to go with the unpopular flow of political window dressing and shameless underhandedness from the top.
Branville McCartney represents a new breed of politicians in The Bahamas - who are eager to serve the people with a progressively ambitious and productive agenda. He appears ready to tackle the vexing illegal immigration issue that has plagued The Bahamas for decades and even to this day – for example.
He looks ready to change the bureaucratically uncreative business as usual mentality in government, and replace it with an administration for and by the people. Brad McCartney is a budding leader who has challenged an old order in Bahamian politics that seems determined to enforce its detested will on an electorate longing for change that they really can believe in.
The resignation of Branville McCartney has a lasting impact on modern Bahamian politics. It signals a revolution in the making in the national political landscape.
It is hoped that Mr. McCartney would not relent in his drive for higher political office and social, economic, and political deliverance for a deserving people; as doing so will only result in a serious political backlash – like that of Algernon Allen when he turned thousands on to his one man game on the R.M Bailey Park some years back – then he bucked under heavy political pressure and returned shamelessly to his vomit. The rest is hard-to-swallow history.
Only time will reveal the genuineness of Mr. McCartney’s recent decision. The masses are watching with buoyant enthusiasm, and optimism. It is worth taking this matter sincerely Mr. McCartney, or the political exit heartlessly awaits you.
Bahamas Blog International
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Branville McCartney: I won't take blame for Elizabeth vote
By PAUL G TURNQUEST
Tribune Staff Reporter
pturnquest@tribunemedia.net:
FORMER Minister of State for Immigration Branville McCartney last night hit out at suggestions by senior FNM officials that he was to blame for the party's less than stellar performance in the Elizabeth by-election.
According to sources within the FNM, Mr McCartney was berated at an FNM council meeting last week where a number of meritorious council members (MCM) took the MP to task for the poor showing at the polls in Polling Division 11.
This division, which was headed by the FNM's Minister of State for the Environment Phenton Neymour, was also worked by Mr McCartney who these sources claim, failed to show any "inspiration in his designated duties."
This lack of "inspiration" they claimed was due to the suspicion that the MP was not in favour of the party's candidate Dr Duane Sands, who Mr McCartney could possibly see as another challenger for the leadership of the party if and when the opportunity arose.
"So it came as no surprise to me that he would have resigned," the source added. "Who knows, maybe he was trying to pre-empt what was already in the process of being done."
However, according to Mr McCartney, he has always supported the FNM's candidate in Elizabeth and any suggestion otherwise is completely ridiculous. Further to that, he added that if he did not support Dr Sands he would not have campaigned for him, and the suggestion that he was not "working hard enough" is nothing more than a vicious lie.
"I said publicly on radio my support for Dr Sands. I said that Dr Sands is the best man for the job. My record will speak for itself. You can ask people who campaigned with me," he said.
To Mr McCartney's credit, the MP did note in his resignation letter that he had withheld making this announcement until after the by-election so that it would not hurt the party's chances in Elizabeth.
Reiterating this point, the Bamboo Town MP said he could not possibly be blamed for what happened in Elizabeth as all indicators were revealing that the election was going to be a "close race."
In fact, other sources within the party have suggested that it was the Prime Minister's change in Immigration policy following the earthquake in Haiti that caused the party a number of voters who decided not to show up at the polls.
However, Mr McCartney would not respond to this aspect and maintained that he will be focusing his attention on the affairs of his constituency at this time.
He did say, however, that he remains of the view that if he were to make a push for the leadership of the FNM at some later date, his resignation from the Cabinet of the Bahamas would not be held against him.
"I acted on my personal convictions. And when you act on that you are doing what is right. And when you are doing what is right, how can that hurt you?
"I have not resigned from the party or from my constituency. I intend now to even speak more on other national issues without Cabinet collective responsibility," he said.
As such, the MP said that he will continue to champion the cause of the Bahamian people at large on national issues which will range from Immigration to crime, to land security and border protection.
March 03, 2010
tribune242
Tribune Staff Reporter
pturnquest@tribunemedia.net:
FORMER Minister of State for Immigration Branville McCartney last night hit out at suggestions by senior FNM officials that he was to blame for the party's less than stellar performance in the Elizabeth by-election.
According to sources within the FNM, Mr McCartney was berated at an FNM council meeting last week where a number of meritorious council members (MCM) took the MP to task for the poor showing at the polls in Polling Division 11.
This division, which was headed by the FNM's Minister of State for the Environment Phenton Neymour, was also worked by Mr McCartney who these sources claim, failed to show any "inspiration in his designated duties."
This lack of "inspiration" they claimed was due to the suspicion that the MP was not in favour of the party's candidate Dr Duane Sands, who Mr McCartney could possibly see as another challenger for the leadership of the party if and when the opportunity arose.
"So it came as no surprise to me that he would have resigned," the source added. "Who knows, maybe he was trying to pre-empt what was already in the process of being done."
However, according to Mr McCartney, he has always supported the FNM's candidate in Elizabeth and any suggestion otherwise is completely ridiculous. Further to that, he added that if he did not support Dr Sands he would not have campaigned for him, and the suggestion that he was not "working hard enough" is nothing more than a vicious lie.
"I said publicly on radio my support for Dr Sands. I said that Dr Sands is the best man for the job. My record will speak for itself. You can ask people who campaigned with me," he said.
To Mr McCartney's credit, the MP did note in his resignation letter that he had withheld making this announcement until after the by-election so that it would not hurt the party's chances in Elizabeth.
Reiterating this point, the Bamboo Town MP said he could not possibly be blamed for what happened in Elizabeth as all indicators were revealing that the election was going to be a "close race."
In fact, other sources within the party have suggested that it was the Prime Minister's change in Immigration policy following the earthquake in Haiti that caused the party a number of voters who decided not to show up at the polls.
However, Mr McCartney would not respond to this aspect and maintained that he will be focusing his attention on the affairs of his constituency at this time.
He did say, however, that he remains of the view that if he were to make a push for the leadership of the FNM at some later date, his resignation from the Cabinet of the Bahamas would not be held against him.
"I acted on my personal convictions. And when you act on that you are doing what is right. And when you are doing what is right, how can that hurt you?
"I have not resigned from the party or from my constituency. I intend now to even speak more on other national issues without Cabinet collective responsibility," he said.
As such, the MP said that he will continue to champion the cause of the Bahamian people at large on national issues which will range from Immigration to crime, to land security and border protection.
March 03, 2010
tribune242
Branville McCartney: 'I want to run for FNM in Bamboo Town at next election'
By PAUL G TURNQUEST
Tribune Staff Reporter
pturnquest@tribunemedia.net:
IN LIGHT of his resignation from the Cabinet, Former Minister of State for Immigration Branville McCartney said he hoped he would not be denied a nomination to run as an FNM in the Bamboo Town constituency whenever the next general election is called.
Speaking to The Tribune at his constituency office yesterday, the popular MP said he was hopeful Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham would not seek to "punish" him as he has not yet even made up his mind if he will in fact run again for the House of Assembly.
"I had five years to serve. Right now I have two more years. If I don't get a nomination from the party I doubt I will run as an Independent -- or anything else for that matter. I would have done my time, and I would have done my time well. I guarantee you that. I would have done my time well and I will move on," he said.
As he is widely considered to be one of the few Members of Parliament who can claim to have a "sure seat" due to his representation and work in the area, it is often said that Mr McCartney does not need the FNM backing to win his seat in Bamboo Town.
However, despite this, the MP maintains that he came into Bamboo Town as and FNM and he will leave Bamboo Town as an FNM.
Having resigned from his Cabinet post over the weekend, Mr McCartney said that he will now focus his time on his family and the constituency of Bamboo Town, giving both the "representation and support they need and deserve at this time."
"My strengths will be invested in making them stronger. My energy and ambition will hopefully lead to greater opportunities for them. There have indeed been some very thrilling high points along the way, one of which I am very proud to share with you today. My wife Lisa, my daughters Kasia and Tai and I have welcomed a new member to our family, Lawrence Khail McCartney.
"The birth of each of our children has provided us unbounded joy and emotion and a welcome reminder that life is more about the moments than the occasions, and success in life depends on how well you are able to determine and manage the order of your priorities -- by the acceleration of some, the abeyance of others and the acceptance that in life nothing comes before its time," he said.
March 03, 2010
tribune242
Tribune Staff Reporter
pturnquest@tribunemedia.net:
IN LIGHT of his resignation from the Cabinet, Former Minister of State for Immigration Branville McCartney said he hoped he would not be denied a nomination to run as an FNM in the Bamboo Town constituency whenever the next general election is called.
Speaking to The Tribune at his constituency office yesterday, the popular MP said he was hopeful Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham would not seek to "punish" him as he has not yet even made up his mind if he will in fact run again for the House of Assembly.
"I had five years to serve. Right now I have two more years. If I don't get a nomination from the party I doubt I will run as an Independent -- or anything else for that matter. I would have done my time, and I would have done my time well. I guarantee you that. I would have done my time well and I will move on," he said.
As he is widely considered to be one of the few Members of Parliament who can claim to have a "sure seat" due to his representation and work in the area, it is often said that Mr McCartney does not need the FNM backing to win his seat in Bamboo Town.
However, despite this, the MP maintains that he came into Bamboo Town as and FNM and he will leave Bamboo Town as an FNM.
Having resigned from his Cabinet post over the weekend, Mr McCartney said that he will now focus his time on his family and the constituency of Bamboo Town, giving both the "representation and support they need and deserve at this time."
"My strengths will be invested in making them stronger. My energy and ambition will hopefully lead to greater opportunities for them. There have indeed been some very thrilling high points along the way, one of which I am very proud to share with you today. My wife Lisa, my daughters Kasia and Tai and I have welcomed a new member to our family, Lawrence Khail McCartney.
"The birth of each of our children has provided us unbounded joy and emotion and a welcome reminder that life is more about the moments than the occasions, and success in life depends on how well you are able to determine and manage the order of your priorities -- by the acceleration of some, the abeyance of others and the acceptance that in life nothing comes before its time," he said.
March 03, 2010
tribune242
Free National Movement (FNM) defectors weigh in on Branville McCartney resignation
NOELLE NICOLLS
Tribune Staff Reporter
nnicolls@tribunemedia.net:
FRESH on the heels of his resignation from the Cabinet, Branville McCartney may now have to face political isolation according to his predecessor.
Tennyson Wells, like Mr McCartney, represented the constituency of Bamboo Town under the banner of the FNM. He resigned his Cabinet seat in 2000 to vie for the leadership of the party, which he lost to Tommy Turnquest. Mr Wells later quit the party after what he termed "serious differences of opinion" and sat in parliament as an independent.
Commenting on what he thinks the future will hold for Mr McCartney, Mr Wells said: "I think he will have to continue to look over his back, look over his shoulder, because the rest of his colleagues are not going to stand with him whether he is right or wrong. The vast majority are not going to stand with him even if they know he was right.
Reality
"They want to maintain or enhance their position. They are not going to stand up like men and women. That is the sad reality of politics in this country."
In a statement released by Mr McCartney over the weekend, the former Minister of State for Immigration said the main reason he quit was a feeling of stagnation and a sense that he was not fully utilising his "political potential."
Mr Wells said he was not surprised by the resignation, even though he had not followed the situation closely, as such conflicts are a feature of FNM governments.
He pointed to the example of his colleague Pierre Dupuch, another former member of an FNM Cabinet who was fired by Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham in 2000, after being accused of undermining Mr Ingraham's authority.
Yesterday, Mr Wells said he feels that despite his five-year sabbatical from politics, Mr Ingraham has changed little.
"He basically wants to do everything himself, which is impossible and the country suffers from it and will continue to suffer from it. No man is an island and we are all interdependent. Each of us ought to consider other people's views and give them consideration. No one has all the answers to all the problems in the country. When we realise this it will be better for everybody," Mr Wells said.
March 03, 2010
tribune242.com
Tribune Staff Reporter
nnicolls@tribunemedia.net:
FRESH on the heels of his resignation from the Cabinet, Branville McCartney may now have to face political isolation according to his predecessor.
Tennyson Wells, like Mr McCartney, represented the constituency of Bamboo Town under the banner of the FNM. He resigned his Cabinet seat in 2000 to vie for the leadership of the party, which he lost to Tommy Turnquest. Mr Wells later quit the party after what he termed "serious differences of opinion" and sat in parliament as an independent.
Commenting on what he thinks the future will hold for Mr McCartney, Mr Wells said: "I think he will have to continue to look over his back, look over his shoulder, because the rest of his colleagues are not going to stand with him whether he is right or wrong. The vast majority are not going to stand with him even if they know he was right.
Reality
"They want to maintain or enhance their position. They are not going to stand up like men and women. That is the sad reality of politics in this country."
In a statement released by Mr McCartney over the weekend, the former Minister of State for Immigration said the main reason he quit was a feeling of stagnation and a sense that he was not fully utilising his "political potential."
Mr Wells said he was not surprised by the resignation, even though he had not followed the situation closely, as such conflicts are a feature of FNM governments.
He pointed to the example of his colleague Pierre Dupuch, another former member of an FNM Cabinet who was fired by Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham in 2000, after being accused of undermining Mr Ingraham's authority.
Yesterday, Mr Wells said he feels that despite his five-year sabbatical from politics, Mr Ingraham has changed little.
"He basically wants to do everything himself, which is impossible and the country suffers from it and will continue to suffer from it. No man is an island and we are all interdependent. Each of us ought to consider other people's views and give them consideration. No one has all the answers to all the problems in the country. When we realise this it will be better for everybody," Mr Wells said.
March 03, 2010
tribune242.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)