Showing posts with label Branville McCartney. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Branville McCartney. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

Value Added Tax (VAT) is unfair, untimely, unreasonable and undesirable ... says Democratic National Alliance (DNA) leader, Branville McCartney

Vat Is 'Unfair, Untimely And Unreasonable' - Dna


Tribune242:


DNA leader Branville McCartney continued his push for the government to rethink the introduction of Value Added Tax (VAT), calling it an “unfair, untimely, and unreasonable” burden to place on the backs of Bahamians.

Noting that in September 2012, five months prior to the failed gambling poll, Minister of State for Finance Michael Halkitis, in response to the sovereign credit downgrade by Standard & Poor, indicated that the Government was planning to release its Tax Reform White Paper for public consultation “next month” (October 2012), Mr McCartney said it is clear from all indications that the idea of introducing VAT was well in play prior to January 2013.

“The Prime Minister confirmed this during the mid-term budget debate in February 2013 saying; ‘The Government is implementing a broad tax reform package that includes the introduction of a Value Added Tax (VAT) in July 2014. While that is an ambitious timeframe, I would note that we have had the benefit of detailed studies of the feasibility of VAT in The Bahamas’.”

Mr McCarntey added: “Mr Christie in the House of Assembly continued: ‘The White Paper (which was completed in September 2012) contains a fully articulated policy framework for VAT. Following the public consultation process, the Government will present a refined proposal, and advanced legislation to bring VAT into effect’. We are gravely concerned about Mr Christie who recently suggested to Parliament and the nation that the Prime Minister had high level talks with the Minister of Finance on the VAT issue.

“At this meeting the Prime Minister confirmed that the Minister of Finance, who apparently does not listen to the Prime Minister, was moving ahead on VAT and for this reason he (the Prime Minister) left him (the Minister of Finance) at home and would only let the Prime Minister speak.”

With these comments in mind, Mr McCartney said the public needs to worry that Mr Christie’s views are “schizophrenic” on this issue as he appears to be blaming “his alter ego for VAT”.

“Mr Michael Halkitis, the Minister of State for Finance, stated earlier this year that, apart from the imposition of Value Added Tax (VAT), the Bahamas has no other viable option to spark the required streams of revenue it needs to arrest government debt.

“However, Prime Minister Christie, speaking either as Prime Minister or one of his alter egos, stated that if anyone in the public sector has a better idea he is ready to listen. Numerous local and foreign consultancy groups later, we in the Democratic National Alliance ask, is this the same Christie who in 2013 rejected the Nassau Institute commissioned independent research study of ‘The Potential Impact of VAT for our country’ by Mr David Godsell accusing him of ‘distorting the truth’, and dismissed the DNA’s ideas as ‘nonsense’?

“Our country has not rebounded from the most devastating recession we have ever had and in light of the pending introduction of Value Added Tax we in the DNA are left to wonder if this current government truly cares about Bahamians. It cannot be fair for struggling hard working citizens of the Bahamas trying to make ends meet to now be faced with the fear of not being able to afford the basic survival items because of VAT. Moreover, the people of the Bahamas must be reminded that this government campaigned on putting people back to work and instead they now propose to put extra taxes on their backs,” he said.

At this time, the DNA leader noted, VAT is unfair, untimely, unreasonable and undesirable.

He said: “Mr Prime Minister there are alternatives… you just need to listen. Bahamians are living in a state of fear. Fear of crime, fear of increasing financial insecurity, and now, fear of VAT. There is no clear vision in sight from this group of merry men in the PLP. Their leader has been late, inconsistent and out of touch with the issues that face Bahamians daily.

“Our country is at a critical crossroad and demands that we make the tough decisions to lead our country to prosperity. We need strong dynamic leadership with a clear vision for our country. We need leadership that is not afraid to lead.”

February 24, 2014

Sunday, April 1, 2012

It is likely that Mr. Branville McCartney’s electoral prospects will be doused at the polls... and, following the 2012 general election, he would be relegated to the political dustbin... having been set on the treadmill to political oblivion


The Enigma of Branville McCartney


By ADRIAN GIBSON


 OVER time, my outlook on Branville McCartney has evolved from being particularly enthusiastic about his youthful vigour and gravitas to a diverse perspective where one appreciates his outspokenness and ability to organize, to an opinion that his apparent arrogance, messianic deportment and smug giddiness has created a seemingly enigmatic figure.

 A one-time blue-eyed boy of the local media, Bran McCartney is today a hyperactive populist who leads a fledgling third political party—the Democratic National Alliance (DNA).  Undoubtedly, Mr McCartney ignited the political flames leading up to this election year, flicking lit firecrackers into the core of the political establishment. Bran McCartney—regardless of his razor thin political résumé now the centrepiece of the DNA, whilst the other DNA candidates appear to be mere space-filling, political accessories. Having heard Mr. McCartney’s hot political rhetoric of late, one can conclude that he has seemingly become a mealy-mouthed, one man news cycle. Even more, recently there seems to have been more political departures and drama within the DNA than is on an episode of the Oxygen Network’s TV show “Girls Behaving Badly.” Certainly, it makes for great theatre.

 Politically standing between PLP leader Perry Christie and Prime Minister/FNM leader Hubert Ingraham, Bran McCartney has now forayed into the land of giants where he hopes to out-manoeuvre PM Ingraham and outfox Mr. Christie at the polls.

 That said, the DNA leader has shown himself to be a flip-flopper over the years. Whilst his opinion about PM Ingraham may now differ due to politically expedient motives, in a story published in The Tribune on Wednesday, March 3, 2010 he said:

 “The Prime Minister is also a person who I have learnt a lot from as well. I think he has the best interest of the country at heart. He makes decisions and he is very direct.”

 In another Tribune story, published on the aforementioned date and entitled “I want to run for FNM in Bamboo Town at next election”, Mr. McCartney asserted that he was hopeful that the Prime Minister (PM) would not seek to “punish” him, noting that he hadn’t decided if he would again contest the Bamboo Town seat.

However, he went on to say:

 “I had five years to serve. Right now I have two more years. If I don’t get a nomination from the party I doubt I will run as an Independent—or anything else for that matter. I would have done my time and I would have done my time well. I guarantee you that. I would have done my time well and I will move on.”

 What?! In the wake of this statement, Mr McCartney waffled and not only decided to run—he even formed an entire political party in the process.

 In the earlier report, Mr McCartney maintained that he came into Bamboo Town as an FNM and would leave Bamboo Town as an FNM. Of course, the evidence clearly contradicts that statement.

 In a Tribune article published on Monday, October 4, 2010 and entitled “McCartney predicts tough 2012 general election fight for FNM,” Mr. McCartney declared that the FNM was still the best choice for the country although the party would have to go in overdrive to win over disgruntled voters.

According to the Bamboo Town MP:

 “And I think the FNM, it’s a party of doing things but we’ve not promoted what we’ve done, public relations is not good with the FNM. There have been things done and statements made that perhaps turned off a lot of people, I think showing a lack of compassion. The party will also have to win over young ‘swing’ voters who were not old enough to cast a vote in 2007.”
 Mr McCartney added:

 “It places us to a certain extent at a disadvantage but I have no doubt in my mind that the FNM is the best party (to lead the country).” He then referred to the FNM as an “awesome political machinery.”

 Wow! I wonder if Mr. McCartney still feels that the FNM—and not the DNA—is the best party to lead the country. Such a statement makes one wonder about the real reason behind the formation of the DNA and why Mr McCartney had a sudden change of heart just seven months later (the DNA was launched in May 2011). Could it be that Mr McCartney was upset that the FNM did not hold a convention, one where it was speculated that he had plans to challenge Mr Ingraham for party’s leadership? Was he angry that the PM had not yielded the reigns of the FNM/government when he (McCartney) stated that the time had come for Mr Ingraham to “pass the baton” of party leadership to the next generation?

 When Mr. McCartney resigned from the Cabinet in 2010, he commended Prime Minister Ingraham in his resignation statement and showered praise upon the FNM.

 At that time, Mr. McCartney said:

 “Subsequently, I have been the benefactor of Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham’s political precision and decisiveness. One need to look no further than his decision to introduce me to citizens of the constituency of Bamboo Town as evidence of his unique ability to think, reflect, consider and make the right decision.”

 “We are facing tough times, but I confidently believe that the nation has been mobilized by Mr Ingraham and the FNM and rallied for a great national effort. I have learned why this Prime Minister and leader of the FNM is the most successful leader of our party. And it is because of this that I say, I have no sympathy with and will give no credence or comfort to those who would want to use this resignation to undermine his leadership of the FNM and/or the Commonwealth of the Bahamas,” he then said.
 Say what?! I’m thunderstruck. Is the current incarnation of Bran McCartney the same person who said the abovementioned? What changed Mr. McCartney, what changed?

 In his 2010 resignation statement, Mr. McCartney also said:

 “That the Free National Movement has achieved since its election to a third non-consecutive term as the Government of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas gives me hope for what we can and must achieve in the future and I am humbled to have participated so instrumentally to this end. I am indeed proud to be FNM.”

 Wow. I’m speechless. So, why is this proud FNM now running away from the FNM’s record, one that he admitted that he was an instrumental participant in?

 In the concluding paragraph of his statement relinquishing his seat around the Cabinet table, Branville McCartney stated:
 “Bamboo Town will be ready and the FNM party will continue to lead this great national effort to a fourth election victory with my full, unwavering and steadfast loyalty and support.”

Well blow me down! A fourth election victory and with his “full, unwavering and steadfast loyalty and support!”

 Was the formation of the DNA an example of Mr McCartney’s steadfast loyalty and support? Was it an indication of his lust for power? Mr. McCartney, in the face of your own words, why should Bahamians trust you?

 In February/March 2010, Mr. McCartney pledged his “full, unwavering and steadfast loyalty and support” for the FNM and by mid-March, 2011, Bran McCartney had flip-flopped, broke ranks with the FNM and was on a platform telling people about his dreams and encouraging them to imagine this and that.

 In the announcement of his divorce from the FNM, Mr. McCartney said:

 “It has been difficult, to say the least, facing challenges, which contradicted my philosophy, convictions and values. I have prayed constantly for an answer to solve this dilemma and my prayers have been answered. I have made a conscience decision to severe my relationship with the Free National Movement.”

 As my grandparents on Long Island say, “these are the last days” and, unquestionably, hypocrisy reigns supreme!

 Now leader of the DNA, Bran McCartney is not Barack Obama (circa 2008)—regardless of the fanatical support of a few obsessive supporters who see him as the second coming of Obama.

 Indeed, the race in Bamboo Town will be the hottest electoral contest in 2012. There will be political bloodletting in Bamboo Town, with Cassius Stuart (FNM), Renward Wells (PLP) and Craig Butler (Independent) all running and plotting to ambush McCartney at the polls. The contest for the Bamboo Town seat is a highly contentious matter, leaving McCartney to combat the massive electoral machinery of both major parties. Indeed, it appears that the DNA leader will suffer a political death, even though he has demonstrated an ideal work ethic within his constituency and is heralded as a hard worker, as a young man who understands the true purpose of parliamentary representation of his constituents.

 Perhaps, Mr. McCartney should’ve switched to the South Beach seat or, even more, postponed his plans for the DNA’s launch to focus on winning his own seat as an Independent.

 It is likely that Mr. McCartney’s electoral prospects will be doused at the polls and, following the elections, he would be relegated to the political dustbin— having been set on the treadmill to political oblivion.  
                                 

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Branville McCartney's inaugural speech at the Democratic National Alliance (DNA) party's launch - Thursday May 12, 2011

"Good evening ladies and gentlemen, young women and young men.

It would indeed be remiss of me to start without thanking all of you who are gathered here this evening. It is not by chance that we are here; this is no haphazard occurrence, but this is our chance, our opportunity, to redefine history, to REDIFINE THE POSSIBLE!

I am humbled beyond measure by your presence here this evening and I truly believe that you are not here simply because you have nothing better to do, but because you believe that Change is necessary, and you know, like I know, that our country is not the country we envisioned it to be. You and I are here because we believe that our country is destined for greatness and needs leaders and visionaries that will help us to attain the greatness and prominence that is duly ours on the world stage. You are here simply because you and I alike have recognized that we have been misrepresented and ostracized from the governance of our country.

Tonight, this momentous occasion is a proclamation that a great beacon light of hope and optimism is ready to shine across our island nation and radiate the lives of all Bahamians so that we can begin to dream and wish and desire and believe in a Bahamas that is for Bahamians and a paradise not just for tourist but for natives to enjoy the beauty and bounty of this land.

I alone am not the DNA nor will I ever be; no man is an island; I know unequivocally that it is IMPOSSIBLE to even think that I can do this on my own. I know that I will only be as successful as my team is and I truly believe in the forces of unison; I know that I am not superior to any of you or any of my candidates and pledge to always engage the thoughts and ideas of the public and my candidates, recognizing the value of multiple minds and always mindful of the fact that “two heads are always better than one”.

Tonight, commences the journey of a lifetime. What will evolve out of tonight and the days, weeks and months ahead will have such a lasting and positive impact on our country that generations nowhere in the making; so far removed, would be beneficiaries of this revolution. Tonight, we are here to mark the beginning of a NEW BAHAMAS; we are here to embark on a historical and critical journey in shaping the future of our country so that we can all be proud to say that, “I AM A BAHAMIAN”.

We are also here to defy the odds to demystify the notion that another party cannot thrive in the political arena; to clarify all misconceptions; And let me set the record straight; we are not a third party; we are an alternative party…and a viable alternative at that. I am indeed very mindful of the fact that some of you have gathered here tonight out of immense trials and tribulations; some of you have been so depressed and oppressed by the scorches of torment and persecution. When you leave here however, I hope that your spirits are lifted and rejuvenated because on the horizon is the dawning of a new day, of a new era in the political landscape of our county.

My fellow Bahamians! Look around you - to your left and to your right. What you are about to experience is the beginning of a new future in Bahamian history. This is the beginning, the beginning of a NEW BAHAMAS.

Allow me to engage you for a second…I want you to close your eyes and allow me to paint a picture of what our country could look like…I want you to envision the many possibilities that exist.

Imagine our country in all its natural beauty; with litter free roads and well-landscaped gardens, with stunning architecture and properly maintained buildings. Imagine sidewalk cafes, well lit streets, rows of theatres especially designed for young Bahamian playwrights, and a downtown that is world renowned and envied by the rest of the world, with Bahamian art and crafts galore! Imagine these possibilities!

Imagine parks, nature and bike trails where citizens truly enjoy the outdoors and beaches are sparkling clean and truly enjoyed by our citizens. Just imagine little children running around outside, playing the games of the good ole days; Imagine a Bahamas where citizens are no longer prisoners in their homes; where burglar bars are not a necessity. Imagine being able to sit on your land looking at your garden that now provides your household with fruits and vegetables. Imagine these possibilities!

Imagine being able to walk out of your house and down the street to jump on a bus that you know is safe and secure and family oriented. Imagine a public transportation system that is first world and traffic congestion is a thing of the past. Imagine not having to leave your home at 6:30 am just so that you can drop your children to school, in order to make it to work on time. Imagine that possibility!

Imagine an educational system that facilitates learning, and our public school system is more competitive than the private. Imagine your child excited and enthusiastic about learning and schools that are safe for both teachers and students. Imagine classrooms with the latest technology for learning; where children do not want to leave their learning environments. Imagine a tertiary institution that attracts students from around the world and joins the top ranks of colleges and universities around the world. Imagine a Bahamian Harvard. Imagine these possibilities!

Imagine a hospital that is not over crowded. Imagine not worrying about the cost of healthcare. Imagine that your first option for healthcare service is from the public system and you no longer need or want private care. Imagine that you do not have to travel abroad for world-class medical treatment because you can get it right here in your own country. Imagine a public health care system that is the envy of the region. Imagine the possibility!

Imagine our family of island as producers of fruits, vegetables and livestock that are not only organic, but produced in our own soil by our own people. Imagine being exporters of produce and not importers. Imagine the days when food sustainability is not a far-fetched concept but a prosperous reality. Imagine these possibilities!

Imagine when you are able to make your dreams reality, when you are able to open your own business without hassle and bureaucracy. Where you are encourage and not discouraged to become an entrepreneur. Imagine owning that bed and breakfast that you always dreamed of on the island of your choice. Imagine the limitless possibilities that await you. Imagine these possibilities!

Open your eyes now…You no longer have to simply imagine those things, they can be a reality; they will be a reality when the DNA becomes the government of the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.

The DNA is here to create the same paradise for Bahamians that only tourists and foreigners seem to enjoy. The DNA is here to encourage your to dream beyond your wildest imagination; we are here to dare you to think the unthinkable, to do the impossible. The DNA is here to move this country forward, upward, onward and we are here to do it together!

I want to assure you that this campaign will NEVER be about me; this is about US about what we as a people can do together; because when we work together, we can do the Impossible. I want you to know that the reason I stand before you tonight is not just to present a new party to you; not just to run for office but to partner with you to transform our nation; to galvanize a movement that will reshape our future and re-establish our destinies.

Tonight my fellow Bahamians, we as a people and a nation are about to enter into a new era in Bahamian history, an era that has long been promised to us, but has yet to be delivered. Tonight, we – you and me, we and us - are about to begin rewriting the Bahamian historical narrative, a narrative that will forever change the face of the Bahamian landscape. And despite whatever present misconceptions there may be of us as a people and as an island nation, we, my fellow citizens of what is about to be the greatest little nation in the world, are about to begin re-defining our image and re-defining what is possible in The Bahamas! I ask you, can you feel a brand new day? Can you feel a brand new day? Yes, ladies and gentlemen, young men and young women, we are gathered here tonight to affirm the greatness of our beloved Bahamaland.

I stand before you tonight humble and grateful for the overwhelming show of support that you have shown to The Democratic National Alliance. I stand before you tonight humble and grateful for the opportunity that you are giving the DNA, to serve all of you on a national level. I, and the historic slate of candidates who are about to embark on this journey – some of whom you will meet tonight – stand before you, with the utmost humility and gratitude, and say thank you for letting us be partners with you in leading our nation forward into greatness. With your help, and the help of God, THIS TOO SHALL COME TO PASS.

With the DNA as your next government, we will work to ensure that all of you are empowered to use your God-given, natural gifts and talents to bring about the necessary change that will affirm our greatness - as a nation and as a people - to the world! And I say, again, IT SHALL COME TO PASS!

In 1967, the Bahamas was at a crossroad. The Labor movement was under attack, and Bahamian workers were being denied their due rights in their own country. At the time, one author said that the “building of schools and hospitals (were) carried out haphazardly and on the basis of preference.” Ministers of the government got rich off of the public purse and foreign favors. Government abuse and corruption were rampant, and the Prime Minister, at the time, was said to be the “biggest road-builder in the country.” The poor and uneducated were being buried under a mountain of taxes.

The Leader of the then opposition, Mr. Lynden Pindling, wrote in 1965: “The Bahamas was anything but a paradise for the indigenous people.” He pointed out that the government, at the time, “never introduced a development plan for the islands to improve the situation of Bahamians both socially and/or economically.” A sad commentary which still rings true today.

But, after decades and decades of being second-class citizens in their own country, our people finally stood up and said ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Disillusioned, fed up, and angry at being ignored and feeling disempowered in their own country, our parents, our grand-parents, and, for some, even great-grand parents decided they wanted change. And the rest is history.

In 1992, we once again found ourselves at a crucial historical crossroad. Under siege by a menacing drug culture, oppressed and disenfranchised, a great number of Bahamians were fearful to speak out for change, fearful that they and their families would have to endure debilitating victimization and marginalization in a society where a few men could determine whether a majority had and did not have.

But little did anyone know at the time, there was a new generation of Bahamians lurking in the shadows – a new generation of independent thinkers - both young and old – who refused to be denied access to the Bahamian dream of ownership any longer. They were tired of ownership being for the few and the select. They, like we do today, insisted that ownership be for all. And just like many of you here tonight, they too were unafraid of the victimization that had crippled so many of their parents and those in their parents’ generation. They understood that the best way to fight the terrible victimization that had stifled the true voice and will of the people was at the ballot box. And after 25 years, these young Bahamians went into the polling stations, marked their X’s for a new government. They were not afraid to send the same message back to the same government who decades before told them that ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! And again the rest was history!

And now, some 38 years after the lowering of the Union Jack and the hoisting of the Black, Aquamarine, and Gold which gave Bahamians the courage to dream of promised destinies, here we are again.

In 2011, 44 years after majority rule promised to liberate us, promised us that we would no longer have to unduly suffer in our country, promised us that we would be transformed, history has brought us back to an old familiar crossroad.

We are gathered here tonight, 44 years after Bahamians had become enchanted by the thought that majority rule and independence could bring them economic, political, and societal empowerment and upward mobility, unfortunately the menacing truth is that the overwhelming majority of hardworking Bahamians still have insufficient wealth to take care of their own personal needs; the overwhelming majority still have no voice or say in the way that their society is organized and how decisions are made; and an overwhelming majority of Bahamians are still treated unfairly and unequally. Decades after majority rule and independence, Bahamians are still feeling disillusioned, fed up, and angry at being ignored and feeling disempowered in their own country.

Am I the only one who thinks that our nation deserves more from its leadership?

In this election season, we as a people must decide whether we want real, sincere, and honest change or more of the same.

Tonight, my fellow Bahamians, I implore you to join with us and let us together build The Bahamas, which we DESERVE after 44 years of majority rule and 38 years of independence. Tonight and every night until the day of election we must say in one loud resounding voice –we WILL be the change we want to see! Now, more than ever, is the time for change - a time for a new breed of governance to move our country safely past this most pressing, socially volatile crossroad in our country’s history.

Tonight, in making the DNA’s case for change, I will not present you with an extensively, convoluted list of visionary promises just to impress you. Like you, I am tired of the rhetoric; of plenty talk and no action. My track record speaks for itself and I am not afraid to get the job done. We in the Democratic National Alliance believe in delivering a simple, clear concise action plan for our nation. And the one simple truth that we firmly believe is that once you put people first, everything else will take care of itself. If we put people first, then perhaps we will no longer boast a national grade point average of a “D” that has made the outside world question our brilliance and our intelligence.

If we put people first, perhaps it will move to an “A” that will once again make us the respected and competitive, intellectually brilliant nation that we were meant to be and that many expect us to be; not only regionally but globally.

Putting people first means a dynamic transformation of our country’s educational system, where education will serve as the catalyst for growth and progress because it is both inspirational and engaging; where education will serve the purpose for which it is designed, and that is to produce critically minded, socially conscious individuals who, aware of their social and environmental conditions, will be able to use their acquired knowledge and learned skills, as well as resources available to them, to plan and affect change in their lives, the lives of others in their society, the region, and the world.

In putting people first again, as its simple and primary vision, the DNA will provide the transformative framework by which we can begin the process of developing and nurturing a community of life-long learners who will keep our nation highly competitive in this 21st century global economy, while, at the same time, contributing to and driving national, regional, and indeed worldwide development.

When we put people first and strongly emphasize education, the College of the Bahamas is transformed to the University of the Bahamas and BTVI becomes a truly autonomous, high-tech, state-of-the-art technological and vocational institute, with both institutions producing a trained workforce that can provide expertise and advance ideas on public policy, on good governance, sustainable economic growth, and respect for human rights; then we the citizens of the Bahamas will reap the rewards sewn by the seeds and fertile soils that grow in an educated society.

If we recognizing that status, emoluments and the education of our educators determine the quality and success of all our educational pursuit, then putting people first in education would mean that educators must have an honored place in society. It means that we must be willing to invest heavily in teaching preparation, teaching induction, and the professional development of our present educational planners, administrators, and teachers to ensure that the school system is well managed and the delivery of education is effective.

Putting people first in our vision means that the Bahamas will no longer be seen as just one island of 21 by 7, but a whole chain of diversely unique islands and cays, each with its own characteristically unique population of people and natural environments. Putting people first once more will mean that Grand Bahama and our Family of Islands, which have proven to be a crux and developmental nightmare for past and present governments, will no longer be overshadowed by New Providence. And the DNA’s plan for putting people first will strive to ensure that the country’s total land mass is properly mobilized and utilized so that each island and its people can play an integral part in the country’s social and economic development and well-being.

Indeed, as the frontline organization when it comes to building lively communities, local governments will be given a renewed opportunity to assist the national government in ensuring that their communities are functioning successfully. A DNA government that puts people first will recognize local governments’ role in promoting awareness of social needs and investments. It will allow its duly elected officials to foster a sense of responsible-wellbeing among all sectors in their respective communities so as to help us, as a government, build stronger relationships with businesses and civic groups in the community. Putting people first will mean local government and national government working in partnership with key stakeholders – in the best interest of the people – to address major issues and concerns that continue to stagnate our national progress.

Putting people first will mean that our society and our economy will become healthy, stable, prosperous and secure.

It will mean a new form of government, where Prime Ministers will be limited to two (2) five (5) year terms – no do-overs, no make-ups –encouraging the nurturing of leaders and leadership skills. Members of Parliament will be responsible to the people who elect them, and work towards nation building, one constituency at a time.

It will mean truly effective, responsible, and participatory governance that is by the people, for the people, and of the people; where the people’s voice matters and their concerns are not flippantly waved away.

It will mean that our communities will once again become safe and secure because our men and women in uniform and members of the judiciary - who are charged with maintaining law and order in our society - will be free from political will and interference and properly equipped and empowered – with tools and with training – to administer justice and effectively reduce the growing levels of crime and violence and problems with immigration that plague our society - once and for all.

It will mean a diversification of our industry structure so as to challenge the rich, creative talents, gifts, abilities, and ingenuity of our people, producing an atmosphere of variety, healthy competition, and entrepreneurship.

Putting people first means energy and food security; it means efficient and effective management of our natural resources, protection of our marine resources, revitalization of urban renewal and community development, authentic and trans-form-a-tive advance of Bahamian culture, rebuilding Christian values and focusing on strengthening the family and family morals;
The DNA’s plan for putting people first will mean that Bahamians, will be empowered to achieve their fullest potential in determining their own destinies. The DNA will institute the proper systems of social protection that will enable us to promote the well-being of our people by protecting them from vulnerability and deprivation so that they can all pursue the Bahamian dream of being able to own a piece of the Bahamian land and a home, to adequately feed themselves and afford good health care, and to have enough money to sustain themselves and retire with dignity.

That is why our vision – that The Commonwealth of The Bahamas be transformed into a nation where Bahamian people will be esteemed as the most precious resource - above all natural and material resources - and the nurturing of our intellectual and creative brilliance will help us become a genuinely democratic, economically prosperous, and socially mobile 21st century nation – is comprehensive, short, simple, succinct, and unambiguous.

Under a DNA government, our mission will also be concise and clear; and that is, our mission will ensure that the needs and aspirations of Bahamian people - to be owners with the government in the political, cultural, and economic development of the nation - are met.

We will be devoted to upholding, protecting, and deepening the democratic rule of law in society, promoting openness and accountability in governmental affairs, social justice and equality, and the right of the people to govern and have authority in determining their own destinies, will undoubtedly be a priority.

Now I understand that, after tonight, there may be folks - over the next few weeks and months leading up to the election – who will be determined to ridicule and discredit me, the candidates of the DNA, our vision, our mission, and our efforts, telling you, among other things, that our timing is not right.

But didn’t the UBP tell the Bahamian people the same thing in 1967; that the time was not the right time for leadership under a Pindling administration? Well we all know that for the people who were segregated and being socially and economically oppressed, there was no better time for change. Change came and the country moved forward.

25 years later, in 1992, Mr. Pindling said the same thing to the Bahamian people - that the time was not right for an Ingraham lead government. But the people felt that it was, and they voted for change. Change came and the country moved forward.

Now in 2011, people will try to convince you, persuade you, plead with you that this is not the right time for the DNA. From now until the day when voters march into the voting booth, there may be some crying that the vision of the Democratic National Alliance is not “well-timed.” The detractor to change will do this because they recognize that the DNA is fast becoming the people’s choice for the next government of the Bahamas.

To paraphrase Martin Luther King, our painful history and experience as people in the Bahamas shows us that change is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. So, for the DNA, we will enter a peaceful election campaign and season, peaceful because this time, we will be led by our intellect and not by our emotions, peaceful because we will not be picking any fights during this season, peaceful because Bahamians are proud, decent intelligent people who will appreciate, respect and admire a new entity that exhibits respect for all, irrespective of political affiliation or opinion.

Our job and our duty to this nation, as a party and as a people, is painfully clear; We have an obligation to uphold the democratic principles that will move our country forward to a common, loftier goal.

So that, in the future – sentiments like “ it is not possible to be the President of the College of the Bahamas – Bahamians need not apply” will be unfathomable – YOU will have rewritten the narrative and forever be known in Bahamian history as the generation that gave us the first president of the University of the Bahamas - Because you fought for change and you dared to REDEFINE THE POSSIBLE.

When they tell you that it is not possible for you to run and manage a profitable telecommunications corporation in your own country, you must be the generation that is noted in history for creating a telecommunications giant that all others come to for technological and communications advice – Because you fought for change and you dared to REDEFINE THE POSSIBLE.

When they tell you that it is impossible for you to own and operate a major hotel resort in a country where tourism is king and the sun shines 365 days a year, you must redefine the possible and be noted in history as the generation that empowered the greatest hotelier in the region and perhaps world; because you fought for change and you dared to REDEFINE THE POSSIBLE.

And in the very near future – maybe even as soon as tomorrow – when they tell you that McCartney is too young, too inexperienced, and too out of his time to lead you to a brighter future; that it is impossible for anyone other than The Progressive Liberal Party or The Free National Movement to win, you must be the generation that says, like America, who against all odds elected its first Black president; like Trinidad, with its first woman Prime Minister; and even like Haiti, electing “underdog” musician Michel Martelly as president, NOTHING IS IMPOSSIBLE; We must be the generation that fights for change and to truly redefine what is possible. Together, we – you and me must be that generation that changes the course of Bahamian history by redefining the possible.

There’s a lighthouse in the distance, and the light is shining bright. It is time for us to take control of our ship and steer it towards the light of the lighthouse. There is room enough for all. Once inside the port of safety, we will work together to make sure that there is economic, political, and social stability for all Bahamians.

Take heart my fellow Bahamians, the storm will soon be over; the rain will go away, and we will make it through it; I believe it is already done! I thank you, and encourage you to keep on redefining the possible; under a DNA government, we will once again rely on the spiritual values upon which our nation was built to move us closer to becoming a genuinely free and democratic sovereign nation, where no man, woman or child shall ever be a slave or bondsman to anyone and their labor will no longer be exploited or their lives frustrated by deprivation.

I know that, under a DNA government, The Commonwealth of The Bahamas can become the greatest island nation in the region and the world, and that is why we, the Democratic National Alliance sacrificed our comforts for the comfort of the generations to come. That is why those whom I will introduce to you in short order have put themselves forward to be servants of you, the people; We want to ensure that our society, from Grand Bahama to Inagua, Long Island to Rum Cay, from Bain Town to my beloved Bamboo Town, will no longer be a place where the forces of complacency, oppression, insensitivity, bitterness, and self-hate weigh us down and cripple us; we want to ensure that ours is a society where people will feel safe and secure both in and out of their homes and people will feel like people again.

Remember, this election is for our children, and their children, and their children also. Going into this election season be reminded of Albert Einstein’s observation that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results amounts to insanity. For the sake of our children, and their children, we must decide whether we want change or more of the same.

We can no longer ignore the handwriting on the wall. The time for change is now. If that change does not begin with us, then who will it begin with? If it does not begin now, then when?

I am happy to have joined you tonight in what will be etched in the history books as one of the greatest demonstrations of deepening democracy, of courage, and of change in our country. And what I wish to emphasize most, is that this historical event would not be possible without you…your support and your belief in our dream to create a Bahamas where future generations will look back and understand and appreciate the stance that we have taken and enjoy the fruits of our labor.

On behalf of my absolutely fabulous wife, Lisa, and my children, I wish to thank you for this opportunity to serve. Thank you for this opportunity, along with our accomplished slate of candidates, to be the agents of change. To help you realize and fulfill the power of the dream and to challenge you to REDEFINE THE POSSIBLE!

Thank You; God Bless You; and God Bless the Commonwealth of the Bahamas.

tribune242

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

The National Development Party (NDP) is "still standing" and the movement is "alive and well." - says its Communications Director - Prince Smith

“NDP Won’t Fall Apart”

By ROGAN SMITH
jonesbahamas


If you think the departure of 10 of its executives would cripple the National Development Party (NDP), think again.

NDP Communications Director Prince Smith says the party is "still standing" and the movement is "alive and well."

In an interview with the Bahama Journal recently, Mr. Smith said he wanted to let Bahamians know that the party has not fallen apart just because a handful of executives decided to quit and instead join the Progressive Liberal Party.

Last Wednesday, former NDP Leader Renward Wells – who previously said that third parties were the wave of the future – ate his own words and teamed up with the Opposition.

He took nine of his executives with him.

However, not all of the NDP members left.

Today, according to Mr. Smith, there are hundreds of members.

He said his party is now focusing on other things.

"We wish them well, but we’ve moved on. The National Development Party’s focus is on the plight of our nation, how we’re going to rescue this economy and how we can transform this economy into Bahamian ownership. That’s our focus," he said.

Mr. Smith said the NDP plans to field 41 candidates in the upcoming general election and has already begun the process of ratifying candidates.

He said he hopes to offer himself as a candidate.

But, before any of that happens, the NDP is moving full steam ahead to hold elections to replace its former leader and several executives. He said that could happen within the next two weeks.

He assured NDP supporters that the process will be both "democratic and fair."

"The Bahamas would know that in terms of deepening democracy those aren’t just words we use. The NDP has been the first political party in the history of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas to institute the primary system. We don’t just talk it, we walk it," he said.

There are reports that the NDP has been engaged in talks with Bamboo Town MP Branville McCartney’s new party, the Democratic National Alliance (DNA).

When asked if there were plans to team-up with the DNA, Mr. Smith said his party is interested in any entity that wants to oust the PLP and the Free National Movement (FNM).

"As for coming together, that will only be considered in an environment that promotes democracy, and mutual respect and is determined to bring aid and comfort to the Bahamian people," he said.

May 9th, 2011

jonesbahamas

Friday, May 6, 2011

Renward Wells - former National Development Party (NDP) leader says: Mr. Perry Christie is the gentlemen who is most able as a transitional leader to position The Bahamas and its economy to where we ought to go...

NDP chiefs flock to PLP


By TANEKA THOMPSON
Tribune Staff Reporter
tthompson@tribunemedia.net




TEN members of the executive council of the National Development Party, including party leader Renward Wells, have left the fledgling party and joined the Opposition Progressive Liberal Party.

Mr Wells claimed that the former NDP members were not promised any post or nomination in the next general election by the PLP's leadership in exchange for their membership.

The parting members of the NDP said it is Mr Christie's political philosophy and the change in the political landscape over the last month - presumably the emergence of newly formed Democratic National Alliance - that spurred them to cross party lines.

"I have not been given no nomination for nothing and nobody else did," said Mr Wells at a press conference at ALCO House on Balfour Avenue yesterday. "The political landscape over the past month has dramatically changed. There's the introduction of a new element into that equation.

"There are three men vying for the top job of this country and of the three men who are vying for that job, at least from the perspective of me and the others, Mr Christie is the gentlemen who is most able as a transitional leader to position this country and this economy to where we ought to go. I say that unashamedly," he added.

For weeks the fringe party was in discussions with Bamboo Town MP Branville McCartney and was expected to announce its alignment with DNA as a unified third party choice at the polls. The Tribune understands that certain members of the NDP felt that DNA leader Branville McCartney was cold and not receptive to their ideas. The NDP also had an alliance with the Workers' Party, led by Rodney Moncur.

Latore Mackey, former NDP hopeful for the Clifton constituency, explained why discussions with other fringe parties broke down.

"We have went through an exhausting exercise trying to find the vehicle that will not just take the name of a party into a general election but the vehicle that will best take the message of that party. We've tried with the alternative parties, we've tried forming a coalition but there always was some impasse. The NDP bent over backwards trying to accommodate all and sundry but that has proven fruitless, it has become a position whereas we've allowed personalities to take control as opposed to realising that it is the message of deepening the democracy and empowering the people of this country."

A few members decided not to side with the PLP and will carry on the NDP's name.
Still Mr Mackey feels it will have been difficult for the young party to be successful in the next election. He said while the party did not lack ideals, it was short on members, money and notoriety needed to challenge the two major parties.

Since the party's inception in late 2008 the NDP has been critical of the political establishment and the PLP.

When asked to explain the turnaround, Mr Wells said while he did not agree with all of Mr Christie's political choices he was confident the former prime minister was a man who will govern according to the wishes of the people.

"What we have gotten from the PLP is an assurance that in the upcoming campaign and in the government of Perry Christie over the next five years, that the Bahamian people will be first. That is the assurance that we got," said Mr Wells.

In a statement released last night, the PLP welcomed the former NDP members to the party, saying their actions "demonstrate a key difference between the FNM and the PLP."

"The FNM believes in the acquisition of entire political parties through promises for public relations gains," the statement said. "Alternatively, the PLP invites and welcomes the best individuals into our tent. We are prepared to be the next Government of the Bahamas and welcome those who want to contribute to the good governance of the Bahamas.

"The PLP is a good fit for the former NDP leadership because we put people first. The PLP is committed to a new generation, innovative new ideas."

Thursday, May 05, 2011

tribune242


Thursday, May 5, 2011

Branville McCartney and his Democratic National Alliance (DNA) party will have a lot of competition this election season...

Politicians Dismiss DNA

By ROGAN SMITH
jonesbahamas



After Bamboo Town MP Branville McCartney quit the Free National Movement (FNM) he had one goal in mind – forming a party to challenge both the FNM and the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP), but according to a politician whose organisation declined an invitation to join Mr. McCartney’s new party, he was not "equipped" to do so.

Omar Smith, along with Cassius Stuart, recently dissolved their party, the Bahamas Democratic Movement (BDM) to join the FNM. They took their members along with them.

The men, who served as deputy leader and leader respectively, had been in talks with Mr. McCartney after he quit the FNM several months ago to become an independent MP.

Mr. McCartney was also in talks with the leaders of several other third parties trying to woo them to join his party.

However, the Bahama Journal recently reported that many of those leaders did not take his party seriously.

Mr. Smith explained why he chose not to team up with Mr. McCartney.

"When Mr. McCartney asked to speak with us – and we were more than willing to speak to anyone who was interested in national development – at that time he came to us and he said that he wanted us to join him. At that time I don’t think he was equipped, he didn’t have an organisation and he hasn’t put out a philosophy of what he wants to do," Mr. Smith said.

"I was curious to find out. I asked him and he didn’t have [a philosophy]. All he represented to me is that he wanted to challenge the PLP and the FNM and that wasn’t enough information. So, I wish him well, as I wish any young person who wants to do what he believes in. I think I have a little bit more experience in third parties than he has, but I wish him well and I wish him luck."

Mr. Smith was a guest on the Love 97 talk show, Issues of the Day with host, Algernon Allen yesterday.

When the BDM set out more than a decade ago, it sought to become a viable alternative to the two major political parties. But, the party failed to make waves on the political scene.

In fact, it has contested three elections since it was formed, but has failed to win any seat.

"After we were unsuccessful in three elections [2002, 2007 and the 2010 by-election] and after going door to door in so many constituencies and having people say that they supported what we were doing . . . [we realised that] there’s a different dynamic at work here. Bahamians want to make sure that their vote counts," he said.

"If they are under the impression that your organisation does not have the possibility of winning, or they don’t think you have the possibility of winning that particular seat, they will make sure that their second option gets there."

He continued, "I can still remember going up to these houses where I know these families were once PLP or FNM and they [said they] supported what we were doing. But, when they got to the poll they would say ‘Omar, listen I support what you’re doing, believe me, we support you, but we got to make sure that they don’t come in, we’ve got to keep them out’."

Mr. McCartney and his party will have a lot of competition this election season as there are several other third parties vying for a chance to become the government.

Attorney Paul Moss, activist Rodney Moncur and former journalist Ali McIntosh all have their own political parties.

"I want to encourage all of those people who believe in a cause and believe in certain principles that they’d like see come to fruition to go out there and advocate and push, however, when you look at the lay of the land and look at the reality of Bahamian politics you will come to realise that it is very very difficult to make those inroads," Mr. Smith said.

"There are certain resources that must come to bear for you to have an opportunity to make that leap into parliament. While I wish them well, I think the reality is going to be something different."

During his talk show appearance, Mr. Smith was berated by a number of callers, who suggested he was a hypocrite for becoming a part of an organisation that he had heavily criticised for more than a decade.

The callers noted that Mr. Smith and the BDM were especially tough on FNM Leader and Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham.

But, he said, "If I’m in opposition to you it’s not my job to point out your strengths even though sometimes I did give credit where credit was due. It is not my position to build you up. It’s not my position to say the things that you are doing [well] for the most part. It is my position to critique you and say what you are doing wrong and say how they should be done. That is the way the process works," he said.

Mr. Smith said the FNM has given him and several of the new members assurances that they would be considered for seats and positions within the party.

"There are members outside of Mr. Stuart and myself who are frontrunners for constituencies for the next election. There’s a process within the organisation and I’m familiarising myself with the process and the members of our organisation have been received so well by the FNM and the branches," he said.

Mr. Smith says he is already campaigning.

May 4th, 2011

jonesbahamas

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Renward Wells - National Development Party (NDP) leader says that his party is still in the "valley of decisions" as it pertains to joining Branville McCartney's Democratic National Alliance (DNA)

NDP considers joining DNA party

tribune242




AN ANNOUNCEMENT is expected by the end of the week as to whether or not the National Development Party (NDP) will join with the Democratic National Alliance (DNA) or remain as a third party force going into the next general election.

According to NDP leader Renward Wells, his party is still in the "valley of decisions" as it pertains to the DNA, which was formed recently by former FNM Minister and now Independent MP Branville McCartney.

However, as it stands, Mr Wells said his party will not be making any comments as there are still a few "things to be worked out in the next couple of days." In the meantime, he said he would rather leave whatever "big announcement" will inevitably come to its "predetermined time."

Rumours have been circulating for weeks that the NDP had already dissolved itself and joined with Mr McCartney's DNA party, with Mr Wells and a few other prominent members of the NDP taking up key leadership roles.

Among the positions being reported, it is rumoured that Mr Wells had been promised the position of chairman, with his deputy leader, Lynden Nairn, becoming the deputy leader of the DNA. La'Tore Mackey, it is reported, would be promoted to the position of secretary general, while Mr McCartney remains as leader of the party.

Last week, Mr Wells indicated that his party would make a decision during that week as to its political future. This decision reportedly came days after activist and businessman Ethric Bowe resigned from the NDP after he was out-voted 18 to two over the group's plans to continue talks with outside political organisations.

On his Facebook page, Mr Bowe claimed a tyre on his car was slashed after the "contentious" meeting.

Mr Bowe left the party because he thought the NDP was "betraying" its core principles, explained Mr Wells, who added that the former's claims of a slashed tyre are unfounded.

However, all of the third party's attempts to amalgamate may be in vain as Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham has dismissed their importance in the upcoming general election.

During a recent business opening, Mr Ingraham foreshadowed that the election will strictly be between the PLP and the FNM.

"Period, full stop ... that's who people are going to decide (from in) the next election of the Bahamas," Mr Ingraham said.

Attempts to reach Mr McCartney for comment were unsuccessful.

April 27, 2011

tribune242

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

The People's Deliverance Party (PDP) has elected PLP leadership hopeful Paul Moss as its leader

New political party elects Paul Moss as leader

By ALISON LOWE
Business Reporter
alowe@tribunemedia.net



THE newly-formed People's Deliverance Party (PDP) has elected PLP leadership hopeful Paul Moss as its leader and intends to run a full slate of candidates in the next general election, according to sources within the grouping.

The PDP "already has 23 candidates" lined up to run in constituencies throughout New Providence and the Family Islands and will have a markedly "pro-Bahamian" platform.

"They intend to launch on May 24," said a source close to the party yesterday. In addition to attorney, Mr Moss, Grand Bahamians Troy Garvey, a former NDP member, and Glen Rolle, are said to both have taken executive positions in the PDP.

The PDP will join the Democratic National Alliance, headed by former FNM MP, Branville McCartney and the National Development Party, as yet another outside political force that will vie for political power in the general election, against the mainstream parties, the PLP and the FNM. Outside political party, the Bahamas Democratic Movement, headed by Cassius Stuart, was earlier this month absorbed into the governing FNM party.

"We believe the Bahamian people are ready for it. Everywhere we go people are saying that they need change and want an alternative and we think that will bode well for us. We basically see this as the best time where we have the opportunity to come out and have an affect on the Bahamian people in a real way and we're excited about their chances," said a source within the PDP.

Speaking about the PDP's philosophy, the source said: "We believe we will run The Bahamas for Bahamians. We're not really moved by what we see in terms of these international companies and persons who may dictate to our government. Our party frowns on the decision of the Prime Minister to relax restraints on foreign ownership in restaurants and entertainment. We believe this is how you swallow up a culture.

"This movement is really about getting the Bahamas back on track. We went off track several decades ago, that is to say there was not a deliberate approach to assisting the Bahamas. The approach of this party will be very deliberate. That is what sets us apart."

As for how the party intends to finance its campaign, the source said the PDP has "no doubt" that it can do so. However, they added that they hope their ambitions for public office can also be facilitated by what they perceive to be a desire for change amongst Bahamians akin to that which brought the PLP to power for the first time.

"If one goes back to mid 60s where the PLP was vying to become the government they did not have all the resources either but there was a moment in that period when Bahamians said 'We are not going to be put on or turned on by money, we are going to do right by our children' and we believe this is that moment again.

"The money is fleeting but if you do what is right you will see the benefits for your children. We have sufficient funds but we know the moment is also right for a 1960s-type movement," said the source.

April 26, 2011

tribune242

Friday, April 22, 2011

Bahamian politics, politicians, pundits, pollsters, strange bedfellows and the next general election in The Bahamas

Politicians, pundits and pollsters

By Philip C. Galanis





With slightly more than one year, at most, before the general election must be called, the political temperature is already rising. In February this year, Dr. Andre Rollins resigned from the NDP, the political party he helped to create, and joined the PLP. He was quickly nominated to be the latter's standard bearer in the Fort Charlotte constituency.

In March, Branville McCartney, the FNM Member of Parliament for Bamboo Town, resigned from the governing Party and announced that his newly formed Democratic National Alliance (DNA) will contest the next elections with a full slate of candidates.

Not to be outdone or upstaged by Christie's PLP or Bran's DNA, last week Prime Minister Ingraham, with great fanfare and flanked by fellow-ministers and followers, welcomed Cassius Stuart, the Leader of the Bahamas Democratic Party, along with virtually his entire disbanded decade-old organization, into the Free National Movement. And let us not forget that one of the dailies predicted the imminent demise of the National Democratic Party, given the dissatisfaction with several of its leaders and disaffection from its ranks.

Meanwhile some Bahamian political spectators are virtually salivating in exuberant excitement and eager expectation to see which other veteran and wannabe politicians will be co-opted and who will defect from their current positions as this political ballet is choreographed and performed on the political stage. Perhaps as never before will the adage that "politics makes strange bedfellows" be corroborated as a truism in Bahamian politics — for the next few months, in any event.

Therefore this week, we would like to Consider This...what are we to make of the recent developments that have evoked such excitement on the domestic political landscape and what part do the pundits and pollsters play in this ever-growing drama we call Bahamian politics?

Politicians

It has become very clear that some of the recent novices and veterans in the political arena have now realized that they will continue to be marginalized by remaining on the periphery of the real political stage, outside the organizational mainstream of the two behemoths that are the PLP and the FNM. Accordingly, Dr. Andre Rollins and Cassius Stuart — along with almost his entire party — have determined to hitch their political fortunes to the major parties.

A frequently asked question regarding such political vacillations is whether those persons are really interested in improving the things that they have articulated to be wrong with both the country and the major political parties that up to one year ago they vehemently opposed, or are they more interested in their own political elevation and personal aggrandizement? Although Bran McCartney has taken a very different course, some will put the same question to him. Just how true they remain to their principles and fundamental positions will become more apparent in the fullness of time.

Pundits

The term "pundit" normally refers to one who regards himself as an expert in a particular subject and who offers his opinion or commentary to the public on that subject. Punditry has been applied to political analysis, the social sciences and sports. Traditionally, political pundits would include radio and television talk show hosts and their guests who are generally knowledgeable in such matters. Pundits also include newspaper and magazine columnists, most of whom, with the exception of the Scribe and Front Porch by Simon (both pseudonyms), have the courage of their convictions to identify themselves and stand by their positions, whether the public perceives their positions to be right, wrong or indifferent.

Pundits are often not necessarily scientific in their approach to political analysis, relying more on their intuition, a sixth sense, if you will, a historical frame of reference and even on their personal experience to explain the vicissitude of politics.

In a general sense, however, many Bahamians think of themselves as political pundits and equally possessed of the qualities that characterize those who more traditionally fit the definition. Virtually every Bahamian has a political opinion. Because Bahamians are generally well-informed on partisan and national issues, extremely interested in the body politic and politically astute, they are as eager to express their views as they are prepared to criticize or support government and opposition policies and decisions. And that is very healthy for our polity.

Pollsters

Pollsters on the other hand, as compared to pundits, attempt to provide a degree of scientific sophistry to political developments and issues of the day. An effective pollster will have a good understanding of mathematical and statistical methods to analyze and interpret events and to forecast outcomes. In short, pollsters have mastered the art that many politicians so often fail at. They actually ask people what they think about an issue, a policy or a national decision. Then they summarize the answers to the questions that they ask and present their findings based on what people actually think.

Some people are skeptical of pollsters, often objecting to the validity of the answers garnered from the poll, because the "doubting Thomases" question the veracity of persons whom they poll. It has often been suggested that Bahamians will provide the answers that they think the pollster is seeking rather than the truth of how the person polled actually feels.

However, there are techniques for pollsters to filter answers in order to arrive at a consensus position of persons who are polled. Furthermore, although polling in The Bahamas is a relatively new discipline, the politician who prefers to rely exclusively on his intuition or the “expertise” of the pundits do so at their peril. The fact of the matter is that politics has become more scientific in assessing public opinion and sentiment and polling has proven to be a very useful tool to accomplish that task.

Just this past week, the relatively new Bahamian market research firm, Public Domain, headed by Mwale Rahming, released the results of a poll that his firm conducted between February 16 and March 11, 2011. Public Domain indicated that 402 persons were polled, weighted by region, age and gender, in order to ensure that the population represented a good cross-section of the Bahamian adult population. The poll represented a five percent margin of error which is quite acceptable for such an exercise.

To the question: "If the election was held today, which party would you vote for?" the results were reminiscent of the Elizabeth bye-election. The respondents indicated that 28 percent would vote for the PLP and 25 percent for the FNM. What is even more revealing about that poll is that 21 percent indicated that they would vote for a third, unbranded party and 26 percent were undecided. The conclusion of that poll is that 47 percent, nearly one-half of the respondents, did not have an appetite for either the PLP or the FNM. The conclusion can be drawn from this is that there is a very large percentage of disaffected voters who are not happy with the two major parties. This confirms the perceptions of many political pundits.

Secondly, the respondents were asked "How satisfied are you with the current government led by Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham?" The response was that 14 percent were very satisfied, 35 percent were somewhat satisfied for a total of 49 percent who were generally satisfied with the current government. Equally revealing was the conclusion that 21 percent were somewhat dissatisfied and another 25 percent were very dissatisfied for a total dissatisfaction rating of 46 percent. The remaining four percent did not know. This is very interesting when one considers how close today’s figures are to the percentage of voters who actually voted FNM in the last general election, nearly 49.82 percent, as compared to those who didn’t vote FNM but voted PLP, which was 46.98 percent.

Finally, to the question: "If a third political party presented a full slate of andidates with a mix of veteran and new candidates, how likely would you be to vote for this third party?" the responses were astounding. The response was that 32 percent were very likely to do so, 25 percent were somewhat likely to do so, for a total of 57 percent who said that they were likely to vote for a third party. In addition, 11 percent were not very likely to do so, while another 21 percent were not likely at all to vote for a third party, rendering a total of 32 percent who would not likely to vote for a third party. The remaining 11 percent did not know.

These poll results should give both the PLP and the FNM reason to be concerned about voter sentiment at this particular point in time and should also be very encouraging to Branville McCartney who, when this poll was conducted, had not yet announced that he would form a political party and that he would present a full slate of candidates in the upcoming elections.

Conclusion

We have always maintained that the next general election will be a close, fiercely contested and combative conflict. It is clear that politicians must fully understand the political landscape. The pundits will have much to talk and write about as the "silly season" unfolds, sharing their considered opinions and gut feelings with all and sundry. Finally, the pollsters will have an increasingly important role to play as they investigate and measure the actual feelings of voters, unraveling the variables and vicissitudes that will contribute to the success of the victor and failure of the vanquished in the next general election, whenever it is called.

Philip C. Galanis is the managing partner of HLB Galanis & Co., Chartered Accountants, Forensic & Litigation Support Services. He served 15 years in Parliament. Please send your comments to pgalanis@gmail.com.

4/17/2011

thenassauguardian

Saturday, April 16, 2011

Renward Wells - The National Development Party (NDP) leader wants to immediately merge his party with Branville McCartney’s Democratic National Alliance (DNA)

NDP leader wants party to join DNA

By JUAN McCARTNEY
Guardian Senior Reporter
juan@nasguard.com



The National Development Party (NDP) appears to have dissention in the ranks as its leader, Renward Wells, is reportedly trying to have the party immediately merge with Bamboo Town Member of Parliament Branville McCartney’s newly formed Democratic National Alliance (DNA).

In e-mails leaked by at least one NDP member yesterday, Wells urged members of his party, as well as the People’s Deliverance Party, headed by attorney Paul Moss, and Workers Party leader Rodney Moncur, to join the DNA by tomorrow.

NDP members were said to be concerned that McCartney’s leadership would be automatic without members having a say.

Wells claimed that Moss agreed to join the DNA and accept McCartney as leader.

“The solution is for all of us to join the DNA, Bran leads, Paul and I agreed to that already, and the other positions voted on quickly,” said the leaked e-mail. “Obviously the NDP cannot nor do we desire to have our way in everything.”

However, a source close to Moss who did not wish to be identified, said that he never agreed to join the DNA.

NDP member Ethric Bowe discovered Moss’ position and sent a scathing response to Wells yesterday morning.

“Renward, I just spoke with Paul and he again categorically and absolutely denied what you claim in this e-mail,” wrote Bowe.

“…You are creating something far worse than (Prime Minister Hubert) Ingraham could ever create. DNA appears more dangerous than Hubert Ingraham could ever be and based on what you have done to date I would prefer to support Ingraham or (Progressive Liberal Party leader Perry) Christie than DNA.”

Bowe had expressed his desire to join the PLP if the NDP and the DNA could not come to terms.

NDP members were said to be meeting last night. Wells had called for a meeting with the DNA yesterday, but it is unclear if that was the same meeting.

On Tuesday, Wells claimed the NDP was invited to join the Free National Movement. The FNM yesterday denied Wells’ claim and said he initiated the talks.

4/14/2011

thenassauguardian

Sunday, April 3, 2011

The likelihood of Branville McCartney surviving this political slaughter is slim...

“McCartney’s New Party Unlikely”

By ROGAN SMITH



It seems Branville McCartney is going to have a tough job convincing candidates to join the political party he’s trying to form as some of the people he’s attempting to court think of it as "a joke" and not a viable alternative to the two major political parties.

Some of the people who attended Mr. McCartney’s meeting Tuesday night said the Bamboo Town MP is clearly "out of his element."

According to a well-placed source close to discussions, Mr. McCartney, who invited 100 people to his home to discuss the new party, just does not seem to know what he is doing.

"The likelihood of him surviving this political slaughter is slim," the source said.

Mr. McCartney reportedly wants the leaders of two third parties – the Bahamas Democratic Movement (BDM) and the National Development Party (NDP) – to dissolve their organisations and choose a leader democratically.

According the source, those leaders are not even considering such a request.

The Journal understands that the NDP took exception to the request and it remains a "sore spot."

A local newspaper recently reported that Mr. McCartney had raised as much as $25 million to fund his new party. However, the source says that is "pure nonsense."

"Bran has no funding. He says people have agreed to help him if he is able to get commitments. They’re telling him ‘if you form this party we’ll give you the money.’ Bran says he wants to raise $25 million, which is a long stretch. The other parties aren’t even raising that amount," said the source, who agreed to the Journal’s interview on condition of anonymity.

"Branville doesn’t have the money. The major issue at the meeting was fundraising. There were also a lot of arguments going back and forth with people pontificating during the meeting. There was a lot of flowery talk, but nothing of substance. The meeting was full of chaos and confusion. It really just became a social hangout."

The source said to make matters worse, Mr. McCartney is courting a lot of "reject people."

"He is flocking towards candidates who I’m sure even the third parties would reject. Some of these people have very little chance of making a mark on the political scenery," he said.

Even more frustrating, the source says, is the fact that the former cabinet minister is expecting potential candidates to follow him, even though he does not have much political experience.

"Why should these people leave the parties they are with to join up with Bran? He’s someone who has never articulated any vision for the country. What has he done? The only thing he did was resign from Hubert Ingraham’s cabinet and later Hubert Ingraham’s party," he said.

"Mr. McCartney could not even complete his full term as a junior minister. Why would anyone follow his lead? He’s great at marketing himself. He’s great at public relations, but leadership, I don’t think so."

The source said many people turned up to the meeting simply to see what Mr. McCartney is up to.

"A lot of them are going to war during this election. They wanted to know what he’s doing and who the key players are. But, it’s a joke," he said.

"Bran believes that because he’s in the House [of Assembly] and is a sitting MP that he has the upper hand. I’ll give him this; he’s very calculating. But, what he’s attempting now has been done before. I can’t follow a man who [isn’t] smarter than me."

He continued, "Mr. McCartney need only tap the shoulders of Dr. Bernard Nottage [Bain and Grants Town MP] and ask him how it worked out for him when he left the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP) to form his own party. The Coalition for Democratic Reform didn’t fare well, and that’s with a leader who was a political heavyweight."

The Journal understands that a union president, a former talk show host and several other politicians attended Mr. McCartney’s meeting.

"When you’re putting together a party, you have to dissect the candidates and decide who to run. When you pick just anyone the quality of your party deteriorates. Ask any fisherman fishing with a net, when you cast your net, you not only pull up grouper, you also pull up goggle eye fish, seaweed and some rocks – things you can’t use. The point I’m seeking to make is that Bran is courting candidates he can’t use politically," the source said.

Another well-placed source, who requested anonymity, said he does not think that Mr. McCartney will hold on to his constituency. He said he believes the majority of voters will elect a PLP or Free National Movement (FNM) candidate.

"Some people are excited about Bran, but quite frankly he’s going to get demolished at the polls. I’m concerned whether his party will survive after this upcoming election. If he loses tomorrow, I can guarantee you that he’s not going to stick in there. He has no stickability, his quitting as state minister and later the FNM, proved that. When things aren’t going his way, he’s out of there and he lacks courage," he said.

"Look at what he did in the House when the first vote on BTC came up. He was nowhere to be found. A true leader would’ve sat behind Mr. Ingraham and voted ‘no’ on the issue. Be a man. Then, he’s too wishy-washy. He says he respects Mr. Ingraham’s leadership, but felt stifled, then he comes up with some other excuse to try and preserve his political career. Which is it?"

The source said the true test will be what happens after the election.

March 31st, 2011

jonesbahamas

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Renward Wells - National Development Party (NDP) leader: ...now is the time for a third party to really make a difference in the political landscape of The Bahamas

NDP leader: it's time for a third party in Bahamas

By PAUL G. TURNQUEST
Tribune Staff Reporter
pturnquest@tribunemedia.net



HEADING into their discussions last night with Independent MP Branville McCartney, NDP leader Renward Wells said that he feels now is the time for a third party to really make a difference in the political landscape of the Bahamas.

Hoping to either court the Bamboo Town MP into joining the NDP or have their party make some type of alliance with whatever movement Mr McCartney will form, Mr Wells said they hope to be "the alternative" to both the PLP and the FNM at the polls.

"We believe that it is high time for another party, other than the PLP or the FNM. It is absolutely the right time to do it," he said.

At the meeting, which was scheduled to be held at Mr McCartney's home on John F Kennedy Drive, Mr Wells said that the NDP will have 14 persons present, including himself, as representative from the Bahamas Democratic Movement. Other notable young politicians are reported to be attending.

Mr Wells said that his party has decided to send such a large contingent because they represent the heads of a number of their internal committees and must relate what transpired with first hand knowledge.

"Actually I am taking a lot of people who support Mr McCartney so they can hear from him as to what is what, and then they can make up their minds based on what they currently believe and are willing to accept. Because at the end of the day, the others have made their position quite known, this is what it is, he must come to the NDP and they are not changing from that at all.

"And they have said they don't want to go. This is our position and we are not changing that," he said.

Mr Wells said that based on what happens at the meeting last night he may have to "work" on these party members if the NDP intends to move in the direction of aligning itself with Mr McCartney.

If the Bamboo Town MP were to join with the NDP and lead the organization, Mr Wells said that they will hold a convention within 30 days so that this decision can be made by their entire organization.

"There are even people in the NDP already who would want him (Mr McCartney) for leadership; most certainly. I believe that at the end of the day, those persons not only support Bran being the leader of the party, they support it being done the right way.

"I don't want people to believe that Renward Wells is a megalomaniac. I am willing of Bran being the leader in the House of Assembly because he is the only one there. Undoubtedly I can tell you that if I run against him (for the leadership) he will more than likely win. But this isn't about me. This is about the Bahamian people. If they believe that Bran is the best man to make that change, I will grab my shield and follow him into battle," he said.

As a relatively new political organization, Mr Wells said that the NDP has already faced its share of challenges - namely the departure of its former national chairman Dr Andre Rollins. However, he said that because their party is grounded in its message and "principles", they have survived.

"A political party must not be about a man, it must be about the message. It can't be about the person, it must be about the principle. You cannot have an idol, you must have an ideology. Men and women will come and go, but the truth and the message will remain. When you create parties around men, they fail; look at the CDR (Coalition for Democratic Reform). The NDP will and cannot join any institution that is built around a man," he said.

March 30, 2011

tribune242

Friday, March 25, 2011

Free National Movement (FNM) Bamboo Town Constituency Association on Branville McCartney’s Resignation

Bamboo Town Association Blasts McCartney Over Resignation


By IANTHIA SMITH



For months tensions boiled within the governing Free National Movement (FNM) party and after remaining silent on the issue for quite sometime now, representatives of the FNM Bamboo Town Constituency Association are speaking out about Branville McCartney’s resignation.

In a press release issued late yesterday the association said, "We wish to express our considerable personal and collective disappointment over the resignation of Mr. Branville McCartney from the FNM and the abrupt manner in which it was done."

The release went on to say that Mr. McCartney did not inform the executives of the Bamboo Town Association prior to his decision adding that they learned of his decision at the same time it was made public.

The association said having worked for his election to the House of Assembly and on his behalf in Bamboo Town, they would have expected the basic courtesy of prior notification and consultation.

"Mr. McCartney had numerous opportunities to inform the association leadership of his decision, even as recently as last Thursday night, when two of our executives met with him. He could have telephoned our association chairman immediately prior to his resignation," the release added.

"Many in Bamboo Town still do not understand his abrupt resignation from the Cabinet and now his resignation from the FNM. The philosophy, manifesto, policies and leadership of the FNM have not changed since Mr. McCartney was elected to the House of Assembly as an FNM, and joined Mr. Ingraham’s Cabinet."

The association said it is its view that the majority of FNMs in Bamboo Town, as well as the majority of residents in the constituency support the government’s creation of a new partnership between the Bahamas Telecommunications Company (BTC) and Cable & Wireless to create a cutting-edge telecommunications company that will move The Bahamas forward.

The associations’ members say they were stunned that when the big vote came in the House of Assembly, Mr. McCartney seemed more concerned about his own personal decision than the broader needs of the people of The Bahamas.

"We will continue to work for the new and better direction the country is moving in under the leadership of Prime Minister Ingraham and the Free National Movement," they said.

"The Bamboo Town Constituency Association is proud of the work our party has done under Prime Minister Ingraham’s leadership during the worldwide economic downturn.

"We pledge ourselves to ensuring that in the next general election Bamboo Town remains FNM country."

Mr. McCartney resigned from the FNM on Monday.

March 24th, 2011

jonesbahamas

Thursday, March 24, 2011

If Branville McCartney takes the third party course, he could be committing political suicide

Would you vote for a third party?

thenassauguardian editorial


Since the resignation of Bamboo Town MP Branville McCartney from the Free National Movement (FNM) Monday, the national airwaves have been dominated by talk of the formation of a third political party to challenge the FNM and Progressive Liberal Party (PLP).

The last major politician to try the third party route was former PLP deputy leader Dr. Bernard Nottage in 2002 when his Coalition for Democratic Reform (CDR) took on the two major parties. Dr. Nottage’s party failed and he lost his seat. CDR candidates were crushed as non-contenders at the polls.

At the time Bahamians were upset with the FNM, which was fractured and falling apart. They chose to go with a Perry Christie. He was a part of a major political force and he was also a new face to leadership. Christie ran as a “new PLP”, seeking to break with the somewhat tarnished legacy of the defeated old PLP.

At that 2002 election there was something new that was still a part of the mainstream for Bahamians to choose. Dr. Nottage could not compete with that.

Almost ten years later, a young, attractive and charismatic politician (McCartney) may try the same thing. He is not as politically accomplished as Dr. Nottage was at the time he led the CDR to defeat. However, McCartney may have an advantage if he pursues the same course.

At this general election, neither political party has anything new to offer at the leadership level. FNM leader Hubert Ingraham and PLP leader Perry Christie both entered the House of Assembly in 1977. Both men are known. Neither man can claim to be new. Neither man can suggest he can offer something he has not already offered during his long political career.

At this election it could be argued that a message could be presented, stating that Ingraham and Christie, and the FNM and the PLP, are the same thing and a new direction is needed for the country. In recent years there have been annual murder records; the down economy has persisted; and the Bahamian education system is doing poorly.

Though this environment exists, it is unclear if Bahamians will break with the PLP/FNM duopoly.

The key for any third party movement would be to determine if dissatisfaction with the parties could be harnessed into votes. If that dissatisfaction cannot be, starting a third party will only waste money.

Ultimately, Bahamians will have to decide if they will accept others at the national table of decision making or if they think only card carrying PLPs or FNMs should lead The Bahamas.

Before any third party enters the election arena it should understand what is at stake. If defeated badly at the general election, the force will look like a joke never to be considered again.

If McCartney takes the third party course, he would be risking his political career. His force would need to make some sort of impact.

3/23/2011

thenassauguardian editorial