Showing posts with label Keod Smith Bahamas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Keod Smith Bahamas. Show all posts

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Supreme Court Orders Peter Nygard and Keod Smith to Halt Works at Clifton Bay and Simms Point / Nygard Cay...

Court Halts Peter Nygard Work In Clifton Bay Area





By DANA SMITH
Tribune Staff Reporter




THE Coalition to Protect Clifton Bay has won a court ruling halting construction works in the Clifton Bay area by Peter Nygard.

They were also successful in their Supreme Court application to require any dealings between the government, Mr Nygard and Keod Smith regarding Clifton Bay to be made public.
 
The court documents halt works in the Bay area by Mr Nygard and Mr Smith “acting directly or through (their) employees or agents.”
 
Filed before Justice Rhonda Bain, documents say Prime Minister Perry Christie, Deputy Prime Minister Philip ‘Brave’ Davis, and Transport and Aviation Minister Glenys Hanna-Martin must provide the coalition with ‘full and frank disclosure’ of several items.
 
These include copies of any applications or grants of permits, approvals, or leases made by Mr Nygard and Mr Smith in the Clifton Bay area.
 
The Queen and Mr Christie are named as the first respondents, Mr Davis as the second, Ms Hanna-Martin as the third, the Town Planning Committee is listed as the fourth, Mr Nygard as the fifth, and Mr Smith as the sixth. The coalition is the applicant.
 
The fourth paragraph of the court documents say: “The first to fourth respondents must forthwith provide the applicant with full and frank disclosure of the following to the extent that they are within their possession and control:
 
“Copies of all applications (if any) made by the fifth and sixth respondents for permits, approvals, or leases in respect of the works and properties referred to in paragraphs two and three herein;
 
“And copies of all permits, approvals or leases (if any) that have been granted to the fifth and sixth respondent together with, in each case, copies of all the documents that were before the relevant respondent when it reached the decision to grant such permits, approvals, or leases and the reasons for such decisions and the conditions (if any) upon which is may have been made.”
 
The works and properties referred to in paragraphs two and three, involve various construction works in the Clifton Bay area.
 
The second paragraph says: “Until judgement in the judicial review proceedings or until further order of the court, the fifth respondent, (acting directly or through his employees and agents) be and is hereby enjoined from proceeding with or continuing to undertake” the construction of a groyne on the seabed of Simms Point/Nygard Cay or north of Clifton Bay, as well as the dredging of the sea bed in that same area.
 
The third paragraph says: “Until judgement in the judicial review proceedings or until further order of the court, the sixth respondent (acting directly or through his employees or agents) be and is hereby enjoined from proceeding with or continuing to undertake the demolition of the old dock, the construction of a new dock on the sea bed and beach and the placement of large boulders on the western edge of the concrete ramp all at Jaws Beach, south east of Clifton Bay.”
 
Court documents also note a penal notice to the first, second, third, and fourth respondents if they neglect to obey the court’s order for full disclosure.
 
“If you, the within named first, second, third, or fourth respondents, neglect to obey paragraph four of this order, you may be held to be in contempt of court and liable to imprisonment at Her Majesty’s Prison, or a fine or the sequestration of your assets,” court documents say.
 
A penal notice is also listed for Mr Nygard if he neglects to obey the court’s order regarding constructions, north of Clifton Bay.
 
“If you, the within named fifth Respondent, neglect to obey paragraph two of this order, you may be held to be in contempt of Court and liable to imprisonment at Her Majesty’s Prison, or a fine or the sequestration of your assets.”
 
A similar penal notice is listed for Mr Smith.
 
“If you, the within named sixth respondent, neglect to obey paragraph three of this order, you may be held to be in contempt of Court and liable to imprisonment at Her Majesty’s Prison, or a fine or the sequestration of your assets.”
 
June 14, 2013
 
 
 

Friday, May 20, 2011

Picewell Forbes' friends and supporters claim that the PLP is "showing great disrespect" for him by allowing two candidates from his own party - Keod Smith and Charmaine Austin to openly campaign against him in the South Andros seat

MP attacks PLP over candidates

By PAUL G TURNQUEST
Tribune Staff Reporter
pturnquest@tribunemedia.net



FRIENDS and supporters of South Andros MP Picewell Forbes claim the PLP is "showing great disrespect" by allowing two candidates from his own party to openly campaign against him for his seat at the next general election.

And Mr Forbes himself told The Tribune yesterday how he feels a "disservice" has been done to him by his political party.

Speaking out for the first time on this controversial issue, Mr Forbes said the "entire country" knows he turned down two very lucrative job offers made to him by Prime Minister Hubert Ingraham for fear that his acceptance of them would cause "an embarrassment" to the party.

The furious MP said: "And this is the thanks I am going to get? I should not have to be going through this kind of (expletive)."

A close friend of Mr Forbes, who did not wish to be named, added: "By sending these two candidates to campaign for the South Andros seat, the PLP is showing great disrespect to Picewell.

"Where is Perry Christie? Why doesn't he act in Picewell's defence?"

Speaking out in defence of Mr Forbes, fellow PLP colleague Fred Mitchell, the MP for Fox Hill, told the media yesterday that in his estimation Mr Forbes was, and remains, the best candidate for the people of South Andros.

When asked for his opinion on the fact that the former MP for Mount Moriah Keod Smith and political newcomer Charmaine Austin were campaigning in the area, Mr Mitchell said he believes party leader Perry Christie has already made pronouncements on this that he would not go beyond.

"But I believe the incumbent is a good man, and I support him," Mr Mitchell said.

Out of the two other contenders for the South Andros seat, Mr Smith is said to be by far the most aggressive of the pair, having reportedly pledged to spend $17,000 fixing a dock in the Fresh Creek area, and also donating other cash to help in the staging of the island's annual Crab Fest celebrations.

These "grandiose shows" of money, coupled with the "door to door campaigning" has irritated some PLPs who sympathise with the fact that Mr Forbes is one of the most financially-challenged Members of Parliament.

During the radio programme 'Hard Copy' hosted by former BIS director Steve McKinney, many callers expressed the view that the leadership of the PLP should have by now stepped in and resolved this growing issue over the South Andros nomination.

This view was also shared by a senior FNM yesterday who used the opportunity to remind the Bahamian electorate that it was this same "indecisive leadership" within the PLP that caused the all-important 'independent voters' to turn against that party in favour of the FNM.

With the FNM not even naming a candidate for the seat as yet, some political observers also added that it was unfair to the area's current Member of Parliament to have to be "fighting amongst his own" before the "real battle even begins".

May 19, 2011

tribune242